Finedaible wrote: »

I highly doubt ESO's servers or their spaghetti engine would ever be capable of a feat such as cross-play and I haven't seen any indication of it being worked on either. Default response will always be "never say never" but that doesn't change reality.

Furthermore, I don't see why anyone would think cross-play is some magic bullet that's going to solve the game's problems. If anything cross-play is likely to introduce more bugs and performance issues. In my opinion there are far more important things to work on such as Cyrodiil performance, finishing hybridization, and untangling years of neglected systems. With Subclassing and the consequences of that, I'm sure they have an overflowing plate of higher priorities to set straight. Heck, they should have finished hybridization and revamped Provisioning/alchemy like 5 years ago.

I dont wanna be this guy but

ZOS_Kevin wrote: »

As Rich noted during Gamescom, crossplay is being worked on. There is a lot of work to go through because ESO was built way before crossplay was part of the industry. And there is 11yrs worth of content, systems and data to go through. The last thing we want is for systems to be heavily impacted by crossplay and have it an impact on your overall gameplay experience. So it's something we have to be extra careful about. Nothing else to report right now, but there is a team focused on crossplay.

Thanks. I did not know that atronachs also spawned later. I always see air and sometimes frost ones just standing around, so I thought that was it. It's been a long time since I did that quest, but I don't remember seeing flames or storms there. I certainly haven't seen any in a long time.

XSTRONG wrote: »

tomofhyrule wrote: »

XSTRONG wrote: »

A name change to play Crossplay seems like a tiny problem

To some people. Just like losing individual character progress to combine achievements seems like a small thing.

And to others, it’s a gamebreaking issue.

Shouldn’t things be done to impact the fewest people possible? It may take a bit of extra work, but knowingly causing a bunch of your players to leave is probably not the optimal solution.

I dont think if a few players need to change name would cause alot leaving the game.

The News about Crossplay would probably do the opposite and bring in alot of new excitement and returning/new players.

I understand some would hate to change name but I still see that as a tiny problem contra the good things.

Oh, you mean like how the news of “use any skills you want without class restrictions!” totally brought all those people back to the game and nobody is feeling like Subclassing was poorly implemented?
…Or did they think it would go like that, release it as is, and then have to post a whole “how did you feel about U46?” thread when that magic solution failed to get back to 2020 numbers?

Look: you don’t see it as an issue. You want crossplay more than having consistency in your virtual dolls’ names. You think other people are blowing things out of proportion. You see only positives from adding crossplay. And there are people who agree with you.

Is it so hard to fathom that there are people who don’t share your view? Would if really affect you if they actually took all of their players into consideration and set up crossplay in such a way as to not alienate some of their base?

tomofhyrule wrote: »

XSTRONG wrote: »

tomofhyrule wrote: »

XSTRONG wrote: »

A name change to play Crossplay seems like a tiny problem

To some people. Just like losing individual character progress to combine achievements seems like a small thing.

And to others, it’s a gamebreaking issue.

Shouldn’t things be done to impact the fewest people possible? It may take a bit of extra work, but knowingly causing a bunch of your players to leave is probably not the optimal solution.

I dont think if a few players need to change name would cause alot leaving the game.

The News about Crossplay would probably do the opposite and bring in alot of new excitement and returning/new players.

I understand some would hate to change name but I still see that as a tiny problem contra the good things.

Oh, you mean like how the news of “use any skills you want without class restrictions!” totally brought all those people back to the game and nobody is feeling like Subclassing was poorly implemented?
…Or did they think it would go like that, release it as is, and then have to post a whole “how did you feel about U46?” thread when that magic solution failed to get back to 2020 numbers?

Look: you don’t see it as an issue. You want crossplay more than having consistency in your virtual dolls’ names. You think other people are blowing things out of proportion. You see only positives from adding crossplay. And there are people who agree with you.

Is it so hard to fathom that there are people who don’t share your view? Would if really affect you if they actually took all of their players into consideration and set up crossplay in such a way as to not alienate some of their base?

I mean you also dont respect other peoples wishes, because you are against it. You cant please everyone, thats the first thing you got to accept.

Syldras wrote: »

I see he has an extraordinarily cruel owner.

I'm sure he receives regular floggings.

Just give us the skills from the werewolves behemoths

Mathius_Mordred wrote: »

Weesacs wrote: »

One thing I would like added is the morph timer being stopped between BG deathmatch rounds. I prefer the berserker ult morph however to stay in werewolf between rounds I sometimes need to pop a ravage health potion.

Seriously, just stop the timer between rounds lol. I dont want to run the pack leader morph

Does that work? Never though to try it!

Yes however it’s very important to not have anything in the snake blood passive in the alchemy crafting skill line or it won’t work properly.