The point about mushrooms - in this case, Violet Coprinus and Imp Stool - and Mudcrabs not being part of the survey drops is the key factor. But the cloth/leather imbalance was never properly fixed, so I won't hold my breath.

And that reminds me, wasn't there a time when Clothier surveys were only cloth plants?

Vonnegut2506 wrote: »

I got up at 3 a.m. just so I could reserve my names, so if I had to change any character names due to crossplay which I care not a whit about, I would be done.

Nobody, really nobody except the OP said you have to change your name.

LMAO

SilverBride wrote: »

MISTFORMBZZZ wrote: »

Vonnegut2506 wrote: »

I got up at 3 a.m. just so I could reserve my names, so if I had to change any character names due to crossplay which I care not a whit about, I would be done.

Nobody, really nobody except the OP said you have to change your name.

LMAO

I never said we have to change our names.

I just asked how it would affect players IF we did, since that is one possibility of how they may handle duplicate names if crossplay is introduced.

How to make a mood against a new feature wich isnt even released by implying something bad would happen.

The fact you added 5 negative options but only 1 positve and 1 neutral says enough

MISTFORMBZZZ wrote: »

Vonnegut2506 wrote: »

I got up at 3 a.m. just so I could reserve my names, so if I had to change any character names due to crossplay which I care not a whit about, I would be done.

Nobody, really nobody except the OP said you have to change your name.

LMAO

I never said we have to change our names.

I just asked how it would affect players IF we did, since that is one possibility of how they may handle duplicate names if crossplay is introduced.

I just play PC so I might be biased.

I think performance and communication could take a bit of a hit combining regions.

I think combining PC and Consoles could cause economic disruption.

It's possible it's changed since last I knew but, last I knew Consoles had noticeable amounts of bots in some areas. So bringing them to PC might mean bringing the bots depending on implementation.

OP forgot to mention that with all that content in WoW, you also get a 2004 game, visually, mentally, and gameplay-wise.

Besides, as a single-player gamer, I would never play WoW or any other MMO. But I play ESO daily.

ZOS should double down on ESO for single-player gamers, because single-player experience is what makes ESO special. A lot of TES fans are still avoiding ESO like it's a plague. I was one of them until May this year. They're missing out.

But prices..yeah. I do not like the prices.

I currently play on both PC servers with the same group of friends. No interest in joining consoles to the mix.

Versalium wrote: »

OP forgot to mention that with all that content in WoW, you also get a 2004 game, visually, mentally, and gameplay-wise.

Besides, as a single-player gamer, I would never play WoW or any other MMO. But I play ESO daily.

ZOS should double down on ESO for single-player gamers, because single-player experience is what makes ESO special. A lot of TES fans are still avoiding ESO like it's a plague. I was one of them until May this year. They're missing out.

But prices..yeah. I do not like the prices.

WoW has become pretty friendly to single players. Their version of delves is designed for single players and individual progression that at the hardest levels rewards high level gear. The game has introduced what they call follower dungeons where you run the dungeon with a group of NPCs and story mode for the final raid boss so you can see the climax without having to do group content. You don't get great rewards but that isn't the intent of individual content which is to allow solo players to see all of the story and content. I think this has been driven somewhat by the realization that more players rather play alone but also by their main competition FFXIV which introduced many of these features into their game first.

I'm not suggesting anyone switch over as there is more to a game than how it handles solo and group players but to say it is stuck in 2004 is being disingenuous.

BananaBender wrote: »

I'm not expecting ZoS to suddenly double the content they are releasing in each content pass, in fact I would be pretty happy if we got 4 dungeons, a raid, a zone and a new gameplay mechanic + other smaller stuff in each content pass, but the price has to match the amount we get, and to me this just isn't nearly worth 50€. If they know that we are getting less this year, since it's a new model and all, and subclassing is free for all players, why are we getting charged as if it's a whole new game's worth of content, when it's clearly not?

This is the crux of the matter. It's not about what we got (though of course, people are allowed to voice their opinions on it) in terms of the quality of the zone, etc. It's that the pass is overpriced, especially for ESO+ subscribers. And especially since the new feature (subclassing) was base game, so free.

If the price matched the content, there'd be a lot fewer complains. We might be disappointed that we didn't get more content, but nobody would be feeling ripped off.

It wasn't okay to milk players because it's a transitional year. We don't even need to compare what we got in the content pass to another game. We just need to compare it to what we got in previous chapters in ESO to see that the content pass was overpriced.

Next year won't be a transitional year, so that feeble excuse won't work. Hopefully the new people managing the game are hearing loud and clear that we won't be so easily fooled next year, or so easily parted from our money. And hopefully subscribers won't be treated like cash cows.