Best Of
Re: Anyone facing an issue with skills not triggering?
Hey all,
I just wanted to chime in because my group ran into the very same bug last night in the new dungeons.
- Our DPS repeatedly couldn’t trigger spells—sometimes nothing would happen at all.
- At one point, even regeneration completely stopped working, despite banners and food still being active.
- Our tank also experienced skill skips: abilities simply didn’t fire, and several had to be retried before they worked.
It’s pretty frustrating and definitely felt like a desync or server issue, similar to what others are describing here.
Has anyone else noticed such behavior in recent dungeon runs?
Thanks for any insights or possible fixes.
I have definitely felt as though something is wrong with resources in this patch as well.
Re: increase the random quests from mages and fighters guild
DenverRalphy wrote: »They can't expand the base game Guild quests into DLC zones because that could block player access to those quests. To make the quest assignment a smart selection based on player/account availability would require a complete overhaul of the system currently in place. And that ain't happenin anytime soon.
[edit] Not to say I wouldn't like to see it. I think it'd be great if it did happen.
They can by having quest givers in the Mages/Fighters Guilds in the DLC zones.
Re: What Happened to Our Game?
I'll tell you what happens: 200 ms ping, skills that don't come out, block doesn't work, subclasses broke the game, pvp Cyrodiil suddenly crashes and the game closes, I only see green rays and necromancer golems everywhere.
Re: Save Error on PS
Adding in what I've observed here in the event it's helpful.
I had the autosave error for a while now and was just editing the couple of addons it was impacting at the start of each play session.
Autosave error is gone, and any changes I make to addons that I had installed before the patch are successfully saving (reloaded ui, logged out, and restarted the game and the changes were saved across all of it).
Editing to clarify that my settings are saving for all of the addons I had before the patch, including those that previously were not allowing me to save them because of the autosave error.
Then I downloaded a new addon, specifically TGs Group Trackers. To test if my settings would save, all I changed was the setting "show while solo." The default for that setting is on. I switched it to off; the group tracker did disappear as it was supposed to. Then I reloaded ui--the tracker immediately showed back up, so the setting did not save. Editing a second time to correct myself; I actually didn't reload ui to have the setting revert. I opened the map to try and trigger an autosave (which I did), and that reverted the setting.
What's weirder, though, is when I went to change it back, despite the fact that I could see the tracker, the setting still said that it was set to off.
So based on my experience, the changes not saving situation is only applicable to addons that were installed after U47 was installed, and it fails to save changes made to the addons *immediately.* There also seems to be desync between the settings menu and what the addon is actually doing.
I had the autosave error for a while now and was just editing the couple of addons it was impacting at the start of each play session.
Autosave error is gone, and any changes I make to addons that I had installed before the patch are successfully saving (reloaded ui, logged out, and restarted the game and the changes were saved across all of it).
Editing to clarify that my settings are saving for all of the addons I had before the patch, including those that previously were not allowing me to save them because of the autosave error.
Then I downloaded a new addon, specifically TGs Group Trackers. To test if my settings would save, all I changed was the setting "show while solo." The default for that setting is on. I switched it to off; the group tracker did disappear as it was supposed to. Then I reloaded ui--the tracker immediately showed back up, so the setting did not save. Editing a second time to correct myself; I actually didn't reload ui to have the setting revert. I opened the map to try and trigger an autosave (which I did), and that reverted the setting.
What's weirder, though, is when I went to change it back, despite the fact that I could see the tracker, the setting still said that it was set to off.
So based on my experience, the changes not saving situation is only applicable to addons that were installed after U47 was installed, and it fails to save changes made to the addons *immediately.* There also seems to be desync between the settings menu and what the addon is actually doing.
saschmi3
1
Re: TANK ROLE: Bastian vs Isobel vs Zerith
No contest. Zerith because he actually fulfils what real player tanks can do.
Aoe major breach, aoe chain pulling/taunting/major resolve. 100% uptime.
Taunting multiple targets for companions is difficult to do with the massive cooldowns they have, so he's really the only one that can do this effectively.
Aoe major breach, aoe chain pulling/taunting/major resolve. 100% uptime.
Taunting multiple targets for companions is difficult to do with the massive cooldowns they have, so he's really the only one that can do this effectively.
Re: TANK ROLE: Bastian vs Isobel vs Zerith
Bastian is the only one I have as tank, I tried Isobel but she died too much. I haven’t finished leveling Sharp, Azandar, or Zerith-var.
Provoke
On Guard
Drake’s Blood
Kindle
Bulwark
All blue vigorous gear.
Provoke
On Guard
Drake’s Blood
Kindle
Bulwark
All blue vigorous gear.
Re: Will ZOS make BGs great again???
I find it disheartening that ZoS would miss their calling on such a viable aspect as PvP. These so-called battlegrounds can be whole lot better (and popular) if only some thought was put into them.
Make the battlegrounds appealing and exciting to venture into. Not dull and boring.
It's discouraging to sit in a queue for an hour because not enough people want to enter. This is one reason we need battlegrounds for guilds (as I mentioned earlier). I'm sure there would be enough then to get things going. We have this for dungeons and trials, so why not battlegrounds?
Make the battlegrounds appealing and exciting to venture into. Not dull and boring.
It's discouraging to sit in a queue for an hour because not enough people want to enter. This is one reason we need battlegrounds for guilds (as I mentioned earlier). I'm sure there would be enough then to get things going. We have this for dungeons and trials, so why not battlegrounds?
Ulvich
1
Re: Will ZOS make BGs great again???
xylena_lazarow wrote: »A couple other funny parts: He talked about number of players per side making it more punishing, a problem that's only exacerbated by the unviable 4v4 random format. He acknowledges that the 8v8 is the best places for noobs/casuals, yet they keep signing up for 4v4 "competitive" just because it's the default option at the top.MincMincMinc wrote: »The funny part is that everything they are pointing out about being too intense has to do with the actual combat issues in the game and not bg format at all.
same goes for greyhost where lvl10 players are directed to enter vet laggy ballgroup pvp isntead of the u50 campaign that is now beyond dead.
It'd do more good to make a learning environment for people under 500cp or something. Where they literally cant que into something else by accident.
Re: Will ZOS make BGs great again???
A couple other funny parts: He talked about number of players per side making it more punishing, a problem that's only exacerbated by the unviable 4v4 random format. He acknowledges that the 8v8 is the best places for noobs/casuals, yet they keep signing up for 4v4 "competitive" just because it's the default option at the top.MincMincMinc wrote: »The funny part is that everything they are pointing out about being too intense has to do with the actual combat issues in the game and not bg format at all.
Re: Subclassing: what are some ways that you use to deal with loss of class identity?
I am a member of the non-subclassing playerbase so that is how I am dealing with class identity. I do not see any value in subclassing and avoid it. Perhaps in time this will change.
One thing that ZOS could do to get me interested is to simply let me add each skill line to my main without having to give up anything. They can still restrict my ability choices to three skill lines per ability bar but needing to unlearn a skill line to learn another skill line is, for me at least, tedious and boring.
But honestly, even if ZOS did allow this change I probably still would not subclass. Subclassing looks good on paper but in practice I find it to be a dud. Maybe because I don't PvP. /shrug
One thing that ZOS could do to get me interested is to simply let me add each skill line to my main without having to give up anything. They can still restrict my ability choices to three skill lines per ability bar but needing to unlearn a skill line to learn another skill line is, for me at least, tedious and boring.
But honestly, even if ZOS did allow this change I probably still would not subclass. Subclassing looks good on paper but in practice I find it to be a dud. Maybe because I don't PvP. /shrug
Horace-Wimp
10