spartaxoxo wrote: »A good way to get skirmishes done is just to throw more people at it. Create a skirmish group and then either ask someone to leave and make a 2nd one or do so yourself when they all port in.
The calamties being able to jump in make them difficult to do with only 1 group. Not impossible but both the skirmish and calamity are trial level bosses so bringing 2 trial size groups to defeat the skirmishes greatly increases the odds of success.
Don't have any "facts" to share but maybe my comments will spark something.
UI had heard rumors about this add-on having an exploit right now in Cyrodiil that allows people to "wear" 2x the amount of sets and multiple mundus stones simultaneously.
If anyone has more info please share... again just putting my "what I heard" comments here to bring awareness to a potential issue that may/maynot be legit.
I don't think he's using AI to have a conversation with it. He's using it to reformat his thoughts because someone gave him the suggestion to use AI to be more readable. Is AI hallucination bad? Yes. But I also don't think AI agreeing with him is relevant here when he'd have the same opinion regardless. I still much prefer the non-AI comments but there's a difference between using AI as a tool and using AI for validation.
Sharlikran wrote: »That’s where I’ve personally struggled with the Night Market. I can see how creative and interesting the event is, but because so much progression appears tied to organized group activity, I’m having trouble finding a realistic way to participate consistently as a mostly solo player in casual guilds.
Then I find out that the one relic piece that I do manage to get is CHARACTER BOUND... to my healer!!!
In the previous conversation that was closed he was using AI to make his arguments for him. Without understanding what the answer was. At one point, his AI even scraped my answer to another person and responded to that person with my answer. Using AI as a tool is great. Using AI to outsource your thinking is making us argue against clankers.there's a difference between using AI as a tool and using AI for validation.
frogthroat wrote: »In the previous conversation that was closed he was using AI to make his arguments for him. Without understanding what the answer was. At one point, his AI even scraped my answer to another person and responded to that person with my answer. Using AI as a tool is great. Using AI to outsource your thinking is making us argue against clankers.there's a difference between using AI as a tool and using AI for validation.
Therefore, I have 0 trust in any of his posts that include anything from ToS, CoC, or any other official material. I just assume it's AI hallucination and skip it without reading.