Best Of
Re: PvP Magicka Necromancer has the worst offensive toolkit of any class by far
Necro doesn't need a gap closer. If you're worried, use beckoning armor. Knockbacks and such with the graverobber synergy is more an argument for removing self-synergies than it is giving the class a movement skill. Necromancers need ways to deal damage as their kit is quite low in this area. Stam is fine because of how insanely overpowered stamina is in this game and how easy it is for 2h to carry any class. Mag on the other hand has nothing because half of the Destruction staff skills are useless unless you also use the corresponding weapon set to go with them.
Mag in general in this game are awful because Destruction staff is awful and doesn't provide enough to mag kits. Necro is awful because unlike many of the other mag classes, their kit doesn't provide anything to compensate for the deficiency in the destruction staff.
Mag in general in this game are awful because Destruction staff is awful and doesn't provide enough to mag kits. Necro is awful because unlike many of the other mag classes, their kit doesn't provide anything to compensate for the deficiency in the destruction staff.
Re: Dark Passions Regalia Flap
SilverBride wrote: »Flaps and tassets are hideous. I don't know if the designers really like them, or if it's just a bad joke on us.
Every time we complain about them, they vow to make 10 more costumes/motifs with them.
Re: Western Skyrim: Now a dead zone?
Vivec is the best for easy crafting. I don't use Outlaw Refuges much, but Vivec's is also very easy. And, on top of that.... the bankers have no load screen....
Re: Western Skyrim: Now a dead zone?
barney2525 wrote: »Rather than thinking in terms of specific items and/or gear, maybe the better option is Currency. Farm Dragons/Storms for telvar or AP or some new currency to be able to buy stuff from a vendor. Maybe the PvE player would have more interest in joining in PvP IF they could get access to PvP gear First - just to be competitive.
IMHO
Oooh... what if they dropped transmute crystals? That could attract some more players.
Re: Please give us back Rapid Maneuver!
Moving Rapid Maneuver behind a PVP grind created an artificial inconvenience. It does not matter if this was the intention or not, the result is plain to see. This change affected a large number of players. A sizable fraction never played PVP, and so even on their main they do not have Rapid Maneuver any longer. It is not unreasonable to think that a sliver of players would rather spend 3000 crowns to at least get Rapids back on their main. There may even be a sliver of players who spend that much per alt to get Rapid Maneuver back on all of them. Whether that was the intention or not cannot be known, but the effects are subject to fair criticism.
But add the timing of the new consumables and it still makes me wonder. Doesn't necessarily mean an absolute conclusion, but there are two major pieces of evidence toward that notion. The "official" non-answer which completely ignored the existence of valid compromises also seemed off. I still don't even know what it means for them to be happy with how this change is performing, does it mean they are happy with how many players are using Vigor? I know they are able to see metrics on virtually everything, right down to how often specific sets get used, so perhaps that includes skill usage. But wouldn't they have been able to see how many players also used Rapid Maneuver before the switch as well and thought maybe a compromise would have been better?
I don't think I have been too harsh in my criticism of ZOS over the change to Rapid Maneuver, however. I mean, the change only resulted in me feeling depressed whenever I played ESO for a bit and it wasn't one I was able to adapt to yet. I still hope I adapt someday but I would rather they commit to a compromise instead.
But add the timing of the new consumables and it still makes me wonder. Doesn't necessarily mean an absolute conclusion, but there are two major pieces of evidence toward that notion. The "official" non-answer which completely ignored the existence of valid compromises also seemed off. I still don't even know what it means for them to be happy with how this change is performing, does it mean they are happy with how many players are using Vigor? I know they are able to see metrics on virtually everything, right down to how often specific sets get used, so perhaps that includes skill usage. But wouldn't they have been able to see how many players also used Rapid Maneuver before the switch as well and thought maybe a compromise would have been better?
I don't think I have been too harsh in my criticism of ZOS over the change to Rapid Maneuver, however. I mean, the change only resulted in me feeling depressed whenever I played ESO for a bit and it wasn't one I was able to adapt to yet. I still hope I adapt someday but I would rather they commit to a compromise instead.
Re: Dark Passions Regalia Flap
They could just introduce a non-flap customization option, or allow for a "flap-less" version to be purchased.
Re: Introduce Safer Crown Gifting Option: Yes or No
Yes create a vendor that holds crowns like deposit and seller sets a price. Other player can buy the crowns for gold.
That way ALL items in the crown shop become buy able, even non giftable items.
That way ALL items in the crown shop become buy able, even non giftable items.
Re: I have killed over 200 wolves and spiders in Bthzark and still no lead for the Worn Dwarven Gears.
My thorn was Volenfell. Ran that dungeon too many times.
Re: Introduce Safer Crown Gifting Option: Yes or No
Other games have exchanges for the in-game currency to cash shop currency, why ESO doesn't have one is beyond me. Their approach to the player base is to keep trying to ram that square peg into a round hole, so this will probably never be instituted.
Re: Introduce Safer Crown Gifting Option: Yes or No
Stinkyremy wrote: »
And what if you're the one gifting? How is this safe? They could just choose to not pay you the gold.
