GeneralGrundmann wrote: »

Name conflicts are technically almost no issue, for example a "PS Symbol", a "X" or the letters "PC" behind the player name is an easy solution.

No issue for display or backend, but what about for text entry by players? For people using character names to send mails or whispers (or even make reports), how would they be able to produce those icons in text? Is there a way to add them?

Anyone could feed an AI a short prompt and get a very long, low-quality answer that requires a lot of correcting to even be useful. Making this a type of spam.

Separate issue: Where do you think this model is getting its information? It cannot test builds, understand ESO's combat system, or determine which sources are effective builds, let alone up-to-date. It can't access the player experience of ESO and is biased towards outdated websites with good SEO. So it's just summarizing junk from 10 years ago—knowing what data the model does and doesn't have access to is crucial to using it productively.

If you used AI as one step in making your build, and you tested it and found that build to be effective in a way that other people don't know about, that would be helpful to post for others. Otherwise we'll get spammed by long, incorrect slop all day.

As it stands, you're better off starting from scratch, or at least starting with some input from knowledgeable players.

I need vengeance for trials, need these training wheels to get the same skins other people worked for, for years

Fantastic post

Play one-bar without any heals/Shields, mobility/disengage, DoTS or CC in Vengeance and come back and tell me if you don't need a build in vengenace. Consider Vengence "Normal Mode".

Man you guys can't do math or whatever. 3v8 is way worse than 3v4 or 7v8. I would rather do a 3v4 than a 3v8, and it is, in fact, possible to win in 3v4 if the 4th enemy is a potato.

Oh! But in 3 teams you can win with 0 kills by running around the map... That's winning by score and playing objective and has nothing to do with pvp skill! I love winning this way it's exhilarating! I don't totally do this so I can get my transmutes as a concession prize for queing into a losing match and getting stomped on!

ShutUpitsRed wrote: »

Interesting that people are calling 8v8 more chill. Yeah, that's zerg surfing. You're gonna love EP Vengeance. Battlegrounds are for PvP though.

Are they? Tell that to the teams with 0 kills just running to empty flags, had a lot of those.

MincMincMinc wrote: »

Have we heard any word from zos on this recently? I know there are like 10 threads for bgs recently with seemingly everyone in agreement that we would like 4v4v4 bgs to return as an everyday feature.

Still not the case - there's not enough population to have two separate BG queues for 4v4v4s & 8v8s. Maybe after crossplay?

give them an inch they'll ask for a mile

Also laughable to make a judgment call on how someone would vote in elections based on… what they care about in a video game. “I don’t like your thoughts about a video game, so please don’t vote in your real life elections.” Like… what?

There’s this neat thing called a separation between reality and fantasy and mature adults are able to separate and handle that. It’s pretty cool! Compartmentalization is healthy for your brain.

Im on Ps-Na. I voted no because cross-play would change the economies consoles have, obviously the communities, and I feel like trying to merge all the guilds from all platforms onto one server will create such a chaos and will pretty much destroy certain guilds, through traders or guild member numbers. I can see why people would want it, but I think there are too many factors that are going to have to be left upto the "band-aid method".