Skull Crusher AD you win

Dleatherus

@bobbyx - any chance you could rustle up 2-3 DC members and we could hold some 2v2 or 3v3 also?

@Cheapshot - kinda makes it sound like you're fine with imbalance as long as it's on your side? *grins*

D.

Cheapshot

how about we make an event out of this all factions invited register your team then boom bracket elimination pvp.

Cheapshot

@dleatherus imbalance nooooooo I believe your faction has DK's on their character selection screen just like ours does. unbalanced would be outnumbered

Dleatherus

@Cheapshot‌

certainly something to consider - would be a blast

if you have a 5 man team that would join in the fun wed/thurs nite lemme know - let's keep it on a small and manageable level for the first go around - it it's successful, and by that i mean fun for both sides involved, win or lose, then we can look at making it a weekly/larger event?

D.

Cheapshot

@dleatherus Nasan cyox me and all the other players are all the same guild.

Dleatherus

@Cheapshot‌

'numbers' is only one criteria of many that can be used to measure balance

even in r/l numbers aren't an indication of balance - put ONE bowling ball in one scale, and ONE feather in another, and i can tell you that the scale will never be balanced

not relating the bowling ball or feather to one individual, team, or alliance - it was used for demonstration purposes to illustrate a point, and no bowling balls or feathers were harmed during the making of this post

D.

bobbyx

I could get some DC together but really i would just be getting the top players on the campaign, i usually play solo. I do not know any dc pvpers.

joshisanonymous

Dleatherus wrote: »

if i was worried about losing emperorship, i wouldn't offer a solution that was based upon me losing it - that we don't want it in Thorker's hands is common knowledge

perhaps if you have a little attitude adjustment and stop calling folks clowns we can get somewhere in terms of working something out

otherwise see you in skull crusher

your call

D.

To be honest, your motivations seem questionable to me as well. If it was some sort of selfless act to promote activity on EP/DC, why would Thorker have to step down, too? Because you, for whatever reason, don't want him to gain emperorship? That shouldn't be a consideration if your goal is to balance out PvP on Skull Crusher. He doesn't need to step down for your strategy to work, only you, the current Emperor, has to step down. On top of that, even if you both agreed to step down, I'm sure some of your guildmates are likely to become Emperors anyway. You don't really lose much in that situation. In fact, you mostly gain, because you have previous Emperor buffs, and now at least one of your guildmates has Emperor buffs, and you now also have more EP/DC to farm until they've once again been beaten back to their gates.

I applaud your shrewdness here, though. The political intrigue surrounding all this is making me keen on staying on Skull Crusher (EP). Nothing better than PvP with drama.

UglyTriangle

Ratuky wrote: »

I have better suggestion, stop wining like a bunch of 3rd graders. Stop posting to see your self Babbling. If you don't like were you are playing move to a diff server. We didn't pay to see a bunch of baby's crying in a game. Leave this Thorker guy alone, go back to your room and have your mom read a bedtime story get some sleep and get over it. You guys just need a hug. Just a game not a real life situation here

Because you're just bubbling to the brim with insightful information about the current situation on Skull Crusher? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if this is a dummy account either for Thorker or an associate who hopes to be rewarded for licking boots in public. Everything that AD complained about and pinned on DC is now being caused by AD - incessant facerolling, camping spawn points, ganking (and camping) players trying to complete quests, etc.

I can only hope Zenimax finds a solution for PvP woes, maybe a sliding scale for population or buffs for the losing factions. Otherwise, it would be most helpful if guilds were willing to transfer and help out DC and EP. Angry Joe's PVP event did a number on the campaign.

Dleatherus

@joshisanonymous‌

since we are asked to not make accusations or slander others in these forums, I will let Thorker's words speak for themselves - these are not accusations made by us - they were made in public, by him, and are/were for all to see



since I make NO accusation here on the forums (Thorker is more than welcome to post here the screenshots he says he has of me making those), you will have to draw your own conclusions

we for one don't wish to have somebody on the throne who would sell out his own alliance for his own personal gains

that said if and when our emperor-in-waiting- gains the throne, which inevitably he will, we have no problem with it, and will still fight to defend the throne for AD - we just prefer to delay that dark day

end of speculation about nefarious scheming and plotting for D. to retain emperor

now let's get back to discussing how to have some more pvp fun on Skull Crusher

D.

ralonasan

Now that we've agreed to do something about the imbalance and compete, let's say we let the accusations and blame gaming die. Focus on proving your team is better in game, not on the forums.

We (The Crimson Order) will only respond to posts regarding these small scale competitions starting now.

Come get smashed!

Cheapshot

defcon 5 *** just hit the fan .....

ralonasan

@Cheapshot‌ change the name of the thread.

UglyTriangle

ralonasan wrote: »

@Cheapshot‌ change the name of the thread.

You could always start a separate thread?

Cheapshot

oh @ralonasan bro we might just want to start a new thread about the event yo

ralonasan

UglyTriangle wrote: »

Ratuky wrote: »

I have better suggestion, stop wining like a bunch of 3rd graders. Stop posting to see your self Babbling. If you don't like were you are playing move to a diff server. We didn't pay to see a bunch of baby's crying in a game. Leave this Thorker guy alone, go back to your room and have your mom read a bedtime story get some sleep and get over it. You guys just need a hug. Just a game not a real life situation here

Because you're just bubbling to the brim with insightful information about the current situation on Skull Crusher? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if this is a dummy account either for Thorker or an associate who hopes to be rewarded for licking boots in public. Everything that AD complained about and pinned on DC is now being caused by AD - incessant facerolling, camping spawn points, ganking (and camping) players trying to complete quests, etc.

I can only hope Zenimax finds a solution for PvP woes, maybe a sliding scale for population or buffs for the losing factions. Otherwise, it would be most helpful if guilds were willing to transfer and help out DC and EP. Angry Joe's PVP event did a number on the campaign.

Regarding the angry Joes event.... an EP emp was crowned and AJ rage quit live on stream...

AJA or whatever they are called took over the map when dc left and EP was offline. Unless there is something I'm missing here.

ralonasan

UglyTriangle wrote: »

ralonasan wrote: »

@Cheapshot‌ change the name of the thread.

You could always start a separate thread?

Yeah this! Let it die.

Dleatherus

@Cheapshot @ralonasan @bobbyx‌

agreed - as far as i am concerned this thread is dead - start up a new one for SC challenges

ZOS have provided an awesome game for us - the campaigns are unbalanced at the moment - for whatever reason - let's put that behind us, and let's work on what we as the player community in Skull Crusher can do to have fun within the boundaries laid out for us

D.

Cheapshot

Dleatherus winning side gets emperor ......

UglyTriangle

ralonasan wrote: »

Regarding the angry Joes event.... an EP emp was crowned and AJ rage quit live on stream...

AJA or whatever they are called took over the map when dc left and EP was offline. Unless there is something I'm missing here.

I would say it was more or less the catalyst that led to the current situation since it did bring in a few AD PVP guilds. I stayed for about an hour and a half, then left to quest. Then again, this was during the first round and I don't remember seeing a stream? Did he start later or was it during the second event? I wasn't there for the second round.

ralonasan

UglyTriangle wrote: »

ralonasan wrote: »

Regarding the angry Joes event.... an EP emp was crowned and AJ rage quit live on stream...

AJA or whatever they are called took over the map when dc left and EP was offline. Unless there is something I'm missing here.

I would say it was more or less the catalyst that led to the current situation since it did bring in a few AD PVP guilds. I stayed for about an hour and a half, then left to quest. Then again, this was during the first round and I don't remember seeing a stream? Did he start later or was it during the second event? I wasn't there for the second round.

Agreed, and there's a video floating around somewhere with it. He did a speech before it and everything, pretty hilarious

UglyTriangle

Watched my partner and six other DC players try to take a keep and apparently it was of the utmost important for AD to stop a tiny group from retaking a keep close to the DC spawn point. How is that not boring (even cravenly) for AD players?

ralonasan

UglyTriangle wrote: »

Watched my partner and six other DC players try to take a keep and apparently it was of the utmost important for AD to stop a tiny group from retaking a keep close to the DC spawn point. How is that not boring (even cravenly) for AD players?

We might have to team up and help each other take our home keeps at this point. LOL

bobbyx

I assume you just expect them to give us the keep because were not doing well?

UglyTriangle

bobbyx wrote: »

I assume you just expect them to give us the keep because were not doing well?

Assumptions make an ass out of you and me.

Anyways, those who came here to tell stories about the mythical DC zerg train and complain about population imbalance are now part of the problem. Why complain about lack of competition/fun/availability of points and then squash the rebellion any time it rises up? The amount of hypocrisy in this campaign is absolutely astounding.

Either way, I think it was the nail in the coffin for my partner who has been trying to organize groups or participate in existing groups with the hopes of resurrecting a decent Covenant force. Time to move onto a busier campaign!

Dleatherus

@ralonasan‌

this has been a legitimate strategy in AvAvA ever since UO came out 17-18 years ago

our most memorable and fun fight was defending roebeck when, and i believe it wasn't a formal agreement' - EP lined the outer walls on one side pounding an inner postern, and DC lined the other pounding the other postern

luvboard lost the throne that night and it was the most epic fun fight ever -

this post, born out of frustration at the demise of Skull Crusher, might end up being the reason for its revival - msg each other - agree to help each other take the inner keeps - if one 'allies' keep is being attacked, have the other alliance come and fight the AD attackers outside doing the sieging?

distance and the way fast travel works in this game has EP/DC at a disadvantage to start with and AD at a distinct advantage- so choosing something like dragonclaw where everybody, including ourselves, have a long way to travel to it, might be a good place to start? - just thoughts

i'd best stop in case my words get twisted into me trying to scheme and find new ways to farm AP *grins*

have some faith that, although these current campaigns might be 'lost' and that we frustratingly hear very little as to how they will fix them, that they WILL be fixed - game isn't 2 months old yet

and start that other thread for the 5v5, 2v2, 3v3v3 Skull Crusher events will ya?

Cheapshot

SCREW IT. ep and dc just spawn camp AD for a week let them know how it feels

sadly even with ep and dc teaming up we don't have close to the numbers. SC EP has 2 people in it.

shirorxb14_ESO

I like how people say things like "game isnt 2 months old yet". When do you think a majority of people leave an MMO out of frustration with various aspects?

The first month is by far the most important in terms of quick balance and bug fixes. They're taking too long.

ralonasan

Dleatherus wrote: »

@ralonasan‌

this has been a legitimate strategy in AvAvA ever since UO came out 17-18 years ago

our most memorable and fun fight was defending roebeck when, and i believe it wasn't a formal agreement' - EP lined the outer walls on one side pounding an inner postern, and DC lined the other pounding the other postern

luvboard lost the throne that night and it was the most epic fun fight ever -

this post, born out of frustration at the demise of Skull Crusher, might end up being the reason for its revival - msg each other - agree to help each other take the inner keeps - if one 'allies' keep is being attacked, have the other alliance come and fight the AD attackers outside doing the sieging?

distance and the way fast travel works in this game has EP/DC at a disadvantage to start with and AD at a distinct advantage- so choosing something like dragonclaw where everybody, including ourselves, have a long way to travel to it, might be a good place to start? - just thoughts

i'd best stop in case my words get twisted into me trying to scheme and find new ways to farm AP *grins*

have some faith that, although these current campaigns might be 'lost' and that we frustratingly hear very little as to how they will fix them, that they WILL be fixed - game isn't 2 months old yet

and start that other thread for the 5v5, 2v2, 3v3v3 Skull Crusher events will ya?

That night was one of my favorites but also the bane of my pvp existence. Everyone except the Crimson Order signed off when I was 1 keep from emperor. QQ

Harbingers

ralonasan wrote: »

Dleatherus wrote: »

@ralonasan‌

this has been a legitimate strategy in AvAvA ever since UO came out 17-18 years ago

our most memorable and fun fight was defending roebeck when, and i believe it wasn't a formal agreement' - EP lined the outer walls on one side pounding an inner postern, and DC lined the other pounding the other postern

luvboard lost the throne that night and it was the most epic fun fight ever -

this post, born out of frustration at the demise of Skull Crusher, might end up being the reason for its revival - msg each other - agree to help each other take the inner keeps - if one 'allies' keep is being attacked, have the other alliance come and fight the AD attackers outside doing the sieging?

distance and the way fast travel works in this game has EP/DC at a disadvantage to start with and AD at a distinct advantage- so choosing something like dragonclaw where everybody, including ourselves, have a long way to travel to it, might be a good place to start? - just thoughts

i'd best stop in case my words get twisted into me trying to scheme and find new ways to farm AP *grins*

have some faith that, although these current campaigns might be 'lost' and that we frustratingly hear very little as to how they will fix them, that they WILL be fixed - game isn't 2 months old yet

and start that other thread for the 5v5, 2v2, 3v3v3 Skull Crusher events will ya?

That night was one of my favorites but also the bane of my pvp existence. Everyone except the Crimson Order signed off when I was 1 keep from emperor. QQ

I heard someone paid them off to leave...