They have that policy until they don't.
As an example the Shadow Rider Senche Mount did not release with the eyes glowing/glaring through the back of the skull, then after a patch suddenly they did and they have been as such since.
The only policy is that they do as they see fit because they can, the rest is all spin.
StihlReign wrote: »Been discussed and noted in this thread - This is not a bug, it's working as intended and ZOS has a policy to never change art once released (also posted in this thread).
SpiritofESO wrote: »I use Merciless Resolve in PvP sometimes and it does cause a red glow on the head of my staff. Doesn't bother me. I like it.
I thought everybody wanted a glowy weapon? I'm not really understanding the problem here.
StihlReign wrote: »Been discussed and noted in this thread - This is not a bug, it's working as intended and ZOS has a policy to never change art once released (also posted in this thread).
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »
If it was intended, why are sorcerers not covered in purple wispiness? If it was intended why is Grim Focus not invisible like Bound Armour and only show stack effects such as having bound swords?
It's funny how the better looking effect was removed and a constant ugly hazard light was turned on.
They have that policy until they don't.
As an example the Shadow Rider Senche Mount did not release with the eyes glowing/glaring through the back of the skull, then after a patch suddenly they did and they have been as such since.
The only policy is that they do as they see fit because they can, the rest is all spin.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »
To you and other recent people who has lately posted and can't be bothered to read what have been said by numerous people repeatedly over 46 pages, we know what "reason" ZOS gave us that this is "intended" and we know how the skill used to work, but we call bull.
Did you know that when Grim Focus was changed another similar skill went through the exact same change? Sorcerer's Bound Armor. A buff you activated that added stacks which you then could activate again. It also had a visual effect when it was on.
Its visual effect was removed when it was turned into a passive. 2 buffing skills that worked the same and had the same change at the same time, but got two completely different results. If it was intended, why are sorcerers not covered in purple wispiness? If it was intended why is Grim Focus not invisible like Bound Armour and only show stack effects such as having bound swords? Which one was intended? Visible or not visible?
It's funny how the better looking effect was removed and a constant ugly hazard light was turned on.
SpiritofESO wrote: »I use Merciless Resolve in PvP sometimes and it does cause a red glow on the head of my staff. Doesn't bother me. I like it.
I thought everybody wanted a glowy weapon? I'm not really understanding the problem here.
SpiritofESO wrote: »I use Merciless Resolve in PvP sometimes and it does cause a red glow on the head of my staff. Doesn't bother me. I like it.
I thought everybody wanted a glowy weapon? I'm not really understanding the problem here.
this was probably mentioned at one point but i audibly laughed when i finally finished the soulcleaver style pages and threw everything on.
HappyTheCamper wrote: »I just don’t want anything to glow when I stow my weapon away. Nothing else in the game glows when your weapons are put away. Nothing. No other weapons, or skills, or effects are active or glowy while your weapon is on your back or at your belt. They all turn off.
Except Grim Focus. The fact that it still glows even when you put weapons away is just silly.
I’ll even encourage someone to show me another weapon or effect that permanently glows for more than a few seconds after you stow it on your back. I welcome a fact check on this.
HappyTheCamper wrote: »I just don’t want anything to glow when I stow my weapon away. Nothing else in the game glows when your weapons are put away. Nothing. No other weapons, or skills, or effects are active or glowy while your weapon is on your back or at your belt. They all turn off.
Except Grim Focus. The fact that it still glows even when you put weapons away is just silly.
I’ll even encourage someone to show me another weapon or effect that permanently glows for more than a few seconds after you stow it on your back. I welcome a fact check on this.
The Slimecraw 2pc is a permanent intermittent arm glow, even though it's just a static minor buff. It glows for a few seconds, stops for a few seconds, glows, stops, forever. The buff doesn't go on or off, it's static. Always annoyed me.HappyTheCamper wrote: »I’ll even encourage someone to show me another weapon or effect that permanently glows for more than a few seconds after you stow it on your back. I welcome a fact check on this.
hey i'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that this is a joke but can we not start doing this? bumping the permaglow thread has already became a meme around here as-is but throwing shade at other unaffected players over a game design grievance is not going to convince anyone let alone the devs as you're just coming off as spiteful. not sure what this is exactly accomplishing.Elvenheart wrote: »Or, maybe what ZOS should do is pick the most used skill of EVERY class and give it a permanent red glow that only the player can see too and call it a feature instead of a bug. Now that I think of it, this may be the best solution to pass on to the powers that be @.ZOS_Kevin and I apologize if this is coming across as angry and bitter, but it’s just been so long 😫
Precious_Robot wrote: »I have to wonder why ZOS asked for feedback on this. They've got 47 pages of feedback here now and don't seem to have ever looked at the thread again. I hate the red glow. HATE it. And it serves no purpose at all. I'd like them to just put it back to how it was before, where it only glows when the skill is ready and you're in combat. Or never would be good, too!
Customers are still unhappy, and they seem quite willing to persist.DenverRalphy wrote: »They have looked. Kevin has even passed on their decision. Multiple times.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Customers are still unhappy, and they seem quite willing to persist.