ZOS_JasonLeavey wrote: »This is the official discussion thread for the web article “Your Guide to ESO Plus™ Premium Membership.”
Find out more about the excellent in-game benefits that all ESO Plus members will enjoy in Tamriel Unlimited!
Darkonflare15 wrote: »This does not sound as bad as everybody making it out to be. I am going to stay and see how this turn out. Instead of giving up like most people are doing.
RaunHunter wrote: »Alright guys, chill! Think about it. Yes, I understand that this sounds bad and you all feel betrayed. That's how I felt too. I was so mad that I was about to cancel my subscription right away. I hate F2P/P2W that much.
But... Here's the deal:
It's not F2P. It's B2P. Meaning people will still have to buy the game to play it. Also, unless you have your subscription on, you don't get access to DLCs and you have to buy them separately. This means, there's not going to be a million accounts created by some goldseller who is going to spam the chat in high-level zones.
The Crown Store sounds VERY bad at first but when you think about it, it's not. Everyone who has subscribed gets the same amount of Crowns. Albeit all at the same time if you choose the 6-month subscription or spread over the months if you choose the 3- or 1-month subscription. (I understand that this is an incentive that ZOS is giving to those who choose to pay for a long time in advance. But I personally do not like this because I can't afford the 3- or 6-month subscription and have to pay monthly.)
So, because everyone gets the same amount of Crowns, it does not introduce any major imbalance. This is assuming that ZOS DOES NOT allow further purchase of Crowns using real money and that no exotic gear/consumables are available for purchase only with these Crowns. If that is not the case, ZOS is just screwing with its true supporters and we should stay far far away from them.
What we really have here is the opportunity to have more players to play with. Yes, the maturity level of the community is going to be seriously deteriorated because of this move. But with the guild option, it is very easy to control whom you deal with and whom you don't. Those who pay the sub is not going to experience anything different. They still get the DLCs and everything. It's just that those who do not want to pay the sub also has a chance to play the game, with disadvantages. What we need to understand is that this model does not introduce advantages. It introduces disadvantages that subscribers needn't care about.
With all that said, it is sad that ZOS is choosing to make this move. I wish this hadn't happened. But it did. And we have to come to terms with the fact that this is inevitable in all MMOs. But... I personally believe ZOS is handling this much better than those before it.
From what I've read, most of us are hurt with the fact that ZOS chose to do this despite us defending them and claiming that they will never switch to the F2P or B2P model. We are hurt that the haters are having the laugh now. But, frankly, we needn't care about them because they do not care about the game and they are not going to be playing with us. Just let them be and look at this decision for what it truly is. It is not great. But it definitely is not bad either.
ezryderub17_ESO wrote: »Really? REALLY?
How do I feel about this? Betrayed is the short of it.
I defended this game in beta, more at release, and even this passed weekend stood strong on the belief that this game is viable pay to play MMO, and you guys pull this stunt. Giving copy after copy of the game to my Twitch channel viewers so that folks could experience the joys of the game (this one probably won't change with this news), the tight-knit community full of really neat players to meet (this goes away as soon as the f2p'ers enter), and the security of knowing bots and trolls don't have accounts set up once the subscription kicked in (hope your bot management tools are way above par because the things that gave the game such poor early reviews are about to be back).
You lose tons of credibility with your fiercely loyal base when you do this.
Can you at least give us a subscriber-only option for who is allowed to communicated with us? Sub-only zones where we can avoid the things we hate most about free to play games (bots and trolls)?
What can we, your first and loyal customer base, do to keep this from tearing OUR game experience apart? From making OUR contribution to the culture that has brought in so many friends meaningless?
You stand poised to lay waste to the game experience we all have defended so staunchly from all the rumormongers and haters, and you're giving the game to them.
You disappoint us all.
RezRyder
Game on, Ride hard, Live free...
Jennifur_Vultee wrote: »