SkaraMinoc wrote: »My main character, the one I've done all quests on and discovered all points of interest, found all skyshards, learned all crafting, etc. is now obsolete thanks to Subclassing. The builds that I need to stay competitive are no longer possible on my main class, so I must reroll another character and start fresh. Either that or buy skill lines from the crown store and switch characters anytime I need something crafted. You get the idea.
It's also been said before but Subclassing has distilled combat down to maybe 5 skill lines for the serious high-end competitive gameplay.
"oh wow, you're playing XYZ... how original" etc
Would that be okay if the dancing individual was a skeleton, a factotum, a draugr or a xivkyn? At least a Molag Bal illusion makes sense lore-wise, in terms of impersonating an important figure. Who the fork would polymorph a shirty skeleton for lore reasons? If you're equally bothered, then you're 7 to 8 years late. What took you so long?I ran into a dancing Molag Bal, in the middle of town.
On the image (skipped for compact message): You have to ramp in place for the sword arms to show. It's a meridia blessed horse, so give them a little room. Air atro vibes idk. People spent currency on that, and to be fair, they're a cool mount that feels somehow different. Even when 99% of the time, owners just fork on about their business and don't pop the arms out. You don't like that? I don't like mounts that drop a meteor when spawning, but I respect people's right to buy them, use them, and enjoy them. The joy they get from using them is probably way bigger than the discomfort I get from seeing things I wouldn't buy even if I could.Anyone remember this?
Personally the dancer personality where people wiggle non stop is kind of odd...like what is wrong with them.
Cutting images again for the sake of simplicity.Chili_Pepper wrote: »2018...Tamriel Hero looks like
2025...
We got what we deserve...
At least, someone asking for something that makes sense, with a some sort of logical backing (people may have different conditions and get headaches, migraines, even seizures or whatever). Whatever others are using is fine, but mitigating their visuals for whatever reasons could be great. It is complex because how the game is built, but it is a great goal.Vonnegut2506 wrote: »Is there ever going to be an option to shut off the annoying visual clutter, lightshows, and explosion noises on our end?
OMG page two is so far great. Poggers! If anyone disagrees, go check Almalexia or Vivec. They're flamboyant as fork, and they were more powerful than any of our chars! Not saying they were good people, just stating facts. I don't enjoy such flamboyant-ness, but hey, it's good for whoever enjoys it.Gegensmith wrote: »If your "immersion" is broken by a character in flamboyant clothing dancing with a fan or another producing an illusion of a daedric prince, all you're doing is proclaiming just how enervated and anaemic your imagination is.
They were more civil than any of the previous comments they were referring to. And kind of way more than they deserved. I hope Gegensmith enjoys it, not gonna lie.Do you enjoy being as insulting as possible within the confines of civility?
I don't think you're wrong in a way with your whole comment, but I think this sums up this whole conversation, therefore the citing.tomofhyrule wrote: »I'd pay so much for my werebear character to finally look right.
If you're not exaggerating a single bit, I think any medical advisor would suggest you to stop playing this until either there's a solution. Not saying it shouldn't be, but if there's not. I would suggest lowering volume, brightness, contrast and adjust your setup to minimise this. If it's not working, prioritise health. If you're just playing that card (and ignore this if you're not), it's a serious thing, cmon.NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »the game is simply causing me extreme discomfort, pain and nausea with all of this
Erickson9610 wrote: »What I don't want to see is unnatural fur colors as Werewolf Transformation Skill Styles. It's okay if makes your werewolf look like a spirit (like the Totem of Brotherhood in TES V: Skyrim which summoned red spectral werewolves to aid you) but I don't want to imagine a werewolf dyeing their fur. There's a demographic for that, which I'm sure will spend a lot of money for such fur colors — but I am not part of that demographic.
FLAPFLAPFLAP. I agree with you, but I just found it funny, and for the sake of shirtpost I'm quoting you too. FLAPFLAPFLAPEclipse318 wrote: »If I could pick just one thing to get rid of, it's the winged twilight FLAPFLAP pets always in my face everywhere I go.
My spider senses are not tingling wrongly, Re some previous quotes ago Read for sauce.16BitForestCat wrote: »I have screenshots of the second person (RadagastTheRainbow) in that outfit at the 2025 Pride Parade in June. It was a wonderful visual way to show support for the LGBTQIA+ community!
Are cloth dyes not a thing in Tamriel? What's the identity loss otherwise in there? I could agree on the classes thing somehow, but I can see where are you coming from, so you're not even getting thatESO has completely lost all sense of identity, not just with its classes, but with everything in the game. If you don't agree with me, then explain how this "fits" within the Elder Scrolls universe.
I agree. People should be sadder, and miserable. The divines forbid they jest around! People are being funny and dorky while there's dragons! In my own homeland! Don't even ask about what am I going to do.When all you see is jesters, everything seems like a joke.
First of all: it's a company, one of their primary goals is to make money.BetweenMidgets wrote: »If we look at older radiant apex mounts, or even legendary, they were not so over the top.
Oftentimes people work best with parameters. To me, the more recent radiant apex mounts feel more like "design us something that will sell" instead of "design us something that belongs in Tamriel that will sell."
I don't want to sound wrong, but if you want I can show you my swordhorse if you're in PCEU. It's a really great creature. Goofy as fork, but not more than the toy mounts. Which no one has complained about, by the way!Thankfully I have never seen the swordhorse in the game. I thought it was a myth, like the Jersey Devil or Loch Ness Monster.
I hope you're not supporting those impostors anymore.theoverseer wrote: »So...lore-friendly names are immersion-breaking, is that what you're saying? Interesting take. Would they be more or less immersion-breaking than say, for example, Hermione Potter or Thanos_1289? I'm genuinely curious.
Cordially,
Nerys Telvanni
Yes, back in... *checks notes* 1994, when TES Arena released. Did no one tell you this was a fantasy game?TheRimOfTheSky wrote: »Honestly guys the Crown Store realism jumped the shark a while ago.
Your realise all the "cosmetics" you posted were all colour dyes for clothing, a hat and a face adornment, right? No flashy bits, nothing visually annoying. If it's for medical reasons, sure, hide the effects and dismiss my comment. If it's colours that are causing you migraines, use a filter, both characters and a random bright plant will cause that, not the outfits. If it's not that, I'm sorry, you just want to pretend that kind of things doesn't exist, but you can't find the way of politely saying. And no, by no means that's a middle ground, sorry. ESO is a fantasy game, but not one where you can choose what exists and what doesn't.Chili_Pepper wrote: »didnt expect such a reaction on my post here, so let me explain.
[...] And i hope that players with opposite opinion will support us in realizing that option in game settings to turn off visuals that annoy some players. I do not ask to remove all that cosmetics, let it be, but to that players who want to see it. Thank you. Peace to all!
Hello lostineternity. I can reccommend you games that have historical style cosmetics where you are a knight and fight with a Zweihander with a accurate century and location brigandine and klappvisier. For the sake of realism, you can also be a dwarf, carry a lute and play metal songs. While you're installing these games, I may tell you this is a fantasy game, and a at least a partly profit driven company. Last time I checked, Fortnite sales were outpacing any realistic milsim by a lot.lostineternity wrote: »I've been playing other multiplayer games that have settings like "hide non historical cosmetics" and it feels so good, if you want to play COD like lobby with Nicky Minaj and Peter from Family Guy you are welcome, if not play without.
It is called commuting. Not everyone has a direct Vvardenfell-Deshaan private jet. I doubt dolmens are threatening to anyone that made it past CP300 or played ever in a group in the last 8 years.NoticeMeArkay wrote: »The hooks are immense magical constructs, designed to break the boundaries between Oblivion and Mundus; they hook into the ground and the great chains attempt to pull Nirn into Coldharbour. [...]
Turning a world event into a simple player animation makes it non-threatening.
Meanwhile a recall like this one sparks great joy as it doesn't violate my eardrums and feels natural to it's surroundings. It's visuals can also easily be connected to different player figure stereotypes such as druids, hedgemages and alike.
This enables a players creativity.
Adding a new mount with X effect and sounds that are already coded is easier and more profitable than removing all those assets in particular from playing in a certain user game client, which would also be terrible if it was not a free option for everyone. Not saying it shouldn't be done, just answering your question.SilverBride wrote: »Why should exploding loud and bright mounts and recalls take priority over not wanting to be subjected to painful bursts?
The fact you're posting often the same things over and over doesn't mean you're right. Just that other people are not bothering to say something else over and over.NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Many players likely think you have lost your way, because we often have for many years said the same things over and over again, given plenty of examples but it seems to fall on deaf ears so it ends with we us stopping give examples and only vent out our frustration. People get tired of repeating themselves.
Or some attention to werewolves, to give them different werebeast forms or just even different fur colours.
[...]Don't have to stop at vampires either, like we have access to all manner of weird skins, but not a Briarheart skin?
[...]One of favourite mounts are the Baandari apex mounts, just because they are normal looking animals with interesting and well done tack. I could be without the constant silly holding of the compass, though.
Thanks for reading my TED talk. Have a potato 🥔
And he's still smh a pivotal reference in all comedic representation, both in comedy and non comedic environments. Not only he is still relevant if you know stuff around, he was just still keeping up with many trends that had been around for millennia.SilverBride wrote: »Charlie Chaplin was a real world performer 100 years ago. Anything he did is not relevant to what happens in a game world today.
Clowning around at our own leaders isn't the same as demeaning the first big bad guy in the game, and reducing him to a joke.
It's a constant I, I, I. But your priority doesn't necessarily align with other people's. I can tell you the current Mammoth is outselling any Echatere they release. Gut feeling, but I know I'm right. Not saying you're wrong about liking A or B more, just saying it's a money game. I'd love if crown stuff got more representation, it would work great for marketing purposes too, quick "buy now option" if available or saying source. But there's a minor issue: Content is designed months before crown crates are released or even done. So it could end up being a mess. Asking for basegame content to be redone to market crown crates stuff (and some of them being legendary mounts that can't be told from many others and are not going to grab any looks) is just not having a grasp of how things work.Prophet_of_Malacath wrote: »I'd buy an Echatere mount - we see them used by merchants as pack animals, herded by Clan Shatul, in the wild, etc. I'd buy a silt strider pack companion after seeing NPC merchants & Ashlanders traveling with them.
Gloomspore Mounts (in Blackreach)? Vampire thrall skins? Lamp Knight armor? What they all have in common is that they have in-game representation and thus players can form attachments to some or come up with cohesive reasons to have one. One group of friends all got Gloomspore mounts after an adventure in Blackreach, figuring we already had a mycoturge in the guild & OOC it'd be our little memory of the expedition.
Not Great?
The "Ice Wolf" claims Nords of Hjaalmarch ride them yet no one in Morthal does - they only have 4 horses in their stables.
The "Black Bear" claims warriors use them as mounts in northern High Rock & Skyim - but Shornhelm's stables are all horses.
These aren't even obviously glowy mounts - an overwhelming amount of the time, humans either (1) don't use mounts or (2) only have horses. I feel like I'm being pranked each time a mount claims to be used by humans & yet never appear unless its a horse.
I'd argue some of the consistently strongest Crown Crate products are the styles & weapons - I love seeing Lamp Knight on NPCs, I'd love to see Betnikh orcs wearing Seamount style, etc.
The strongest crate items are always the ones one would be willing to use on an NPC in-game. If something is too zany for that low bar, then it's going to be distracting.
you know you can turn that off in settings right? the baandari pack horse is one of my favorites, but i can't stand the silly baskets XD so i turn them off when i use that oneThe mammoth is a 9.5/10 (just because I don't like much the skulls for the stamina update)
Elvenheart wrote: »That’s very interesting, Tho’at 1 normally just gives an ESO+ member 550. I wonder why we’re seeing an extra hundred fortunes?