Best Of
Re: Should Vengeance add Subclassing?
No vengeance is a very balanced and 'fun first' environment (for a lot people) that has a very low entry barrier for every type of player to jump in. Subclassing would detract from that.
I would be a fan of a few rotating skill lines and a very limited rotating set pool per campaign to keep things fresh.
I would be a fan of a few rotating skill lines and a very limited rotating set pool per campaign to keep things fresh.
Re: More on the Microsoft lay offs, it's grim.
ZOS completely refactored ESO from its original vision starting with 1.6 and culminating in 2.6 also known as One Tamriel. The effort actually began a few months after launch and took over 2 years to complete, in response to player feedback.
They didn't stop there, but that's the point when the game became stable from a feature point of view and from which they have iterated since. A few months later, they added Homestead and then started the chapter model which was basically a large annual DLC focused on single player story gameplay -- in contrast the its original vision as the ultimate MMO.
Notably, they made the game much easier, removed vet levels, implemented battle levelling across the board and put a major core gamer feature, AvAvA, on the backburner for 10 years.
It could genuinely be called bending over backwards.
I've been a pretty huge ZOS critic, and one of my biggest criticisms over the years was the degree to which they have changed the game based on player feedback versus what they had originally marketed -- turning the game from one designed for the audience I am part of -- core gamer -- to one appealing to ultra-casual single player TES fans, especially those who started with Skyrim (which represents the vast majority of TES fans).
So of course not everyone feels their feedback was listened to. That's not possible. But in general, they have been incredibly responsive, making ESO largely "Play how you want."
They didn't stop there, but that's the point when the game became stable from a feature point of view and from which they have iterated since. A few months later, they added Homestead and then started the chapter model which was basically a large annual DLC focused on single player story gameplay -- in contrast the its original vision as the ultimate MMO.
Notably, they made the game much easier, removed vet levels, implemented battle levelling across the board and put a major core gamer feature, AvAvA, on the backburner for 10 years.
It could genuinely be called bending over backwards.
I've been a pretty huge ZOS critic, and one of my biggest criticisms over the years was the degree to which they have changed the game based on player feedback versus what they had originally marketed -- turning the game from one designed for the audience I am part of -- core gamer -- to one appealing to ultra-casual single player TES fans, especially those who started with Skyrim (which represents the vast majority of TES fans).
So of course not everyone feels their feedback was listened to. That's not possible. But in general, they have been incredibly responsive, making ESO largely "Play how you want."
Desiato
3
Re: Why does Scorch hit for so much damage when it's an AoE that can roll-catch?
Its about the same as other delayed burst AoE skills, not really an outlier by any means. It actually deals less than 2 Blastbones.
Deep Fissure: 2591+3600 (6191 with both hits, missable but unpurgeable, plus about 9k pen)
Haunting Curse: 2999+2999 (5998 with both hits, unmissable but purgeable, don't need to aim)
Blastbones: 3600 + two instances of disease, so closer to 4000 (shorter timer, technically missable and dodgeable due to pet weirdness, don't need to aim). Two of these would be 7200 (plus 4 instances of disease since Blastbones bypasses the AoE disease cooldown).
Tentacular Dread: 2002 with 0 crux, 3984 with 3 crux (plus an additional 11% from ink, missable, not technically delayed so harder to line up with other skills). Two fully charged would be 7968 (+11% from ink)
The 2900-4000 range is the standard for delayed AoE burst abilities per hit. Unlike Blastbones and Curse, you need to be aimed at your target and mid range or closer with Shalks.
Deep Fissure: 2591+3600 (6191 with both hits, missable but unpurgeable, plus about 9k pen)
Haunting Curse: 2999+2999 (5998 with both hits, unmissable but purgeable, don't need to aim)
Blastbones: 3600 + two instances of disease, so closer to 4000 (shorter timer, technically missable and dodgeable due to pet weirdness, don't need to aim). Two of these would be 7200 (plus 4 instances of disease since Blastbones bypasses the AoE disease cooldown).
Tentacular Dread: 2002 with 0 crux, 3984 with 3 crux (plus an additional 11% from ink, missable, not technically delayed so harder to line up with other skills). Two fully charged would be 7968 (+11% from ink)
The 2900-4000 range is the standard for delayed AoE burst abilities per hit. Unlike Blastbones and Curse, you need to be aimed at your target and mid range or closer with Shalks.
Re: can artist earn rewards in game ?
I mean, there have occasionally been some official contests where one could submit art for a chance to win in-game prizes. As like one-off promotions. Certainly not as some sort of regular thing.
Re: Healing done is not showing the right % on Character sheet...
The character sheet does not correctly show set bonus lines, so the total shown is not correct and higher.
They however still apply. For example your healing tooltip will increase by adding the set lines, though the number in sheet does not go up.
They however still apply. For example your healing tooltip will increase by adding the set lines, though the number in sheet does not go up.
Yudo
1
Re: Should there be a PvE only instance of Imperial City?
my opinion is that IC logic made it toxic for players to play, the concept of losing tel vars on death is kinda nonsense,
for instance in cyrodil you dont lose AP when you die so you keep going and playing for fun on the same time you dont leave empty handed.
but IC made it that every player just hostile to another even if you dont want to engage in a fight which doesnt help, not mentioning the sewer base campers those just pushing players away,
if you look every day on how many players play IC without any pvp event, basically sad on every alliance one bar only.
i suggest from ZOS to rework the mechanics and logic of IC to make it more appealing to players.
for instance in cyrodil you dont lose AP when you die so you keep going and playing for fun on the same time you dont leave empty handed.
but IC made it that every player just hostile to another even if you dont want to engage in a fight which doesnt help, not mentioning the sewer base campers those just pushing players away,
if you look every day on how many players play IC without any pvp event, basically sad on every alliance one bar only.
i suggest from ZOS to rework the mechanics and logic of IC to make it more appealing to players.
Mojey87
5
why no nirncrux or bismuth jewelry trait?
Maybe others have thought this besides us. It's just a rough idea. So go easy on us. 
Gear and weapons have a nirncrux (somewhat rare)item. Jewely doesn't have a crux or Bismuth item. Even if a lesser used trait is removed it could work. Adding flat damage percent of some type to your build after so many heavy nerfs might be welcomed. It'd surely be better than the current harmony or protective values and might make more traits viable. Otherwise, things are just the same old stale meta.
if not crux (maybe for lore reasons or timing) than maybe this new material called Bismuth. It could be that jewelry trait type which ties into the new expansion. My guild mates pretty much think it's a great idea to add a rarer and better trait to jewelry?
It may really be a good opportunity to tie either the base game OR the solstice chapter in with a new jewelry trait that probably should've been there already. Seriously more than one trait is severely lacking.
Have a good time playing
Gear and weapons have a nirncrux (somewhat rare)item. Jewely doesn't have a crux or Bismuth item. Even if a lesser used trait is removed it could work. Adding flat damage percent of some type to your build after so many heavy nerfs might be welcomed. It'd surely be better than the current harmony or protective values and might make more traits viable. Otherwise, things are just the same old stale meta.
if not crux (maybe for lore reasons or timing) than maybe this new material called Bismuth. It could be that jewelry trait type which ties into the new expansion. My guild mates pretty much think it's a great idea to add a rarer and better trait to jewelry?
It may really be a good opportunity to tie either the base game OR the solstice chapter in with a new jewelry trait that probably should've been there already. Seriously more than one trait is severely lacking.
Have a good time playing
Re: ESO LUXURY FURNITURE ITEMS — 2025/07/26
thanks! i like this weekend.
you are thinking of a different fence "Redguard Fence, Brass Capped", the new fence is short.
Pictures for comparison:
Redguard Fence, Brass Capped
Redguard Fence, Short Brass Capped
agelonestar wrote: »Nice to see something make it out of the Crown Store and into the Lux Furniture shop
you are thinking of a different fence "Redguard Fence, Brass Capped", the new fence is short.
Pictures for comparison:
Redguard Fence, Brass Capped
Redguard Fence, Short Brass Capped
Re: ESO LUXURY FURNITURE ITEMS — 2025/07/26
Nice to see something make it out of the Crown Store and into the Lux Furniture shop
