Best Of
Re: Your Play Experience b/t Update 45 and Update 46 with Subclassing and Scribing In Base Game
spartaxoxo wrote: »I think it will probably be the case for a lot of people on forums because they are more invested users. For this question in particular you all may want to do a survey too.
The team wants just general commentary right now. We've ask this similar question in a few places just to get a rough idea from a few communities. It came up in a conversation yesterday and we wanted to just get some quick takes out there without going through the whole survey process. We do have a more formal survey in the works to include a few combat related items, but we'll notify folks when that is ready.
Re: Accounts banned from guild question
It updates the name on your ban list, but unless you have a note you wont 'know' it was that persons name before.
Re: Is "teabagging" [still] considered Trolling and/or Toxic?
Out of curiosity, what about two players crouching and uncrouching repeatedly bothered you, exactly?
I know what the act is intended to represent, yet the way I described it is what they were actually doing. How did this affect you?
I know what the act is intended to represent, yet the way I described it is what they were actually doing. How did this affect you?
Desiato
7
Re: Can we PLEASE have an actual YELLOW dye?!?
I agree. I spent ages fishing and I was disappointed to find out the Fisher dye wasn't really yellow. I would like a yellow dye like the colour you have posted.
Buffy121
7
Re: Why does a same dye look so different on different outfits?
I don't know the answer, OP; but its quite frustrating.
I've never seen anything from the developers on this, though the community have expressed dissatisfaction a fair bit. I guess they're completely unaware or there is some reason that they don't want to change it.
I've never seen anything from the developers on this, though the community have expressed dissatisfaction a fair bit. I guess they're completely unaware or there is some reason that they don't want to change it.
Re: Is "teabagging" [still] considered Trolling and/or Toxic?
Whether a player finds teabagging offensive or not, it does create a LOT of conflict that could be eliminated if the crouching animation was just changed. They could make the player semi transparent, for example. Anything other than what it is now.
The way is it now is just creating a lot of work for customer service, and this conflict isn't going to go away unless this animation is changed to something different.
The way is it now is just creating a lot of work for customer service, and this conflict isn't going to go away unless this animation is changed to something different.
Re: Accounts banned from guild question
See the way you are presenting this case against me, for what? Because I don't want to be stalked? Because I don't feel the need to answer for why I make changes in direction... to anyone other than ZOS?
all the more reason to keep it as it is. if someone is stalking you, then you block them and if it is the way it is, they can't simply change their @name to get around that to keep stalking you. ppl are making assumptions because you are being so defensive. [snip]
[edited for baiting]
Re: PTS Update 47 - Feedback Thread for Black Gem Foundry
Do you have any other general feedback?
This is a feedback less about the dungeon itself, but about one of its rewards. The "Slippery Soul Gem" memento. The memento has us break a soul gem, which is usually okay. However it specifies it's a black soul gem. This is an issue because black soul gems are indestructible:
Legend of Vastarie lorebook:
To Mannimarco, they were perfect. Small, capable of containing even the most willful of souls, and apparently indestructible. To Vastarie, they were deeply flawed, for enchantment was the only safe way to free a soul from their depths.
Removing the single line that says "black" in the description would immediately fix this (admittedly minor) lore issue! Hope you see this, and thank you
This is a feedback less about the dungeon itself, but about one of its rewards. The "Slippery Soul Gem" memento. The memento has us break a soul gem, which is usually okay. However it specifies it's a black soul gem. This is an issue because black soul gems are indestructible:
Legend of Vastarie lorebook:
To Mannimarco, they were perfect. Small, capable of containing even the most willful of souls, and apparently indestructible. To Vastarie, they were deeply flawed, for enchantment was the only safe way to free a soul from their depths.
Removing the single line that says "black" in the description would immediately fix this (admittedly minor) lore issue! Hope you see this, and thank you
Re: Upcoming U47 PTS changes, based on feedback
Why remove the extra magicka from bound aegis. As a magicka sorcerer with hardened ward you need all the magicka you can get. With subclass now magsorc is mega super weak. You nerfed hardened ward while buffing everything else with subclass and now you keep nerfing magsorc by removing mag from bound aegis.
Overamera
10
Re: Upcoming U47 PTS changes, based on feedback
Finally, we'll be looking at our Sorcerer adjustments and reiterating and reverting some of the adjustments based on your feedback:
- Lightning Form will again grant Major Resolve instead of Minor Force to retain its unique damage/defensive hybrid effect.
- Bound Armor will again grant Minor Protection at base rather than Major Resolve. Additionally, the active effect of the abilities will now scale in duration with your Armor, rather than a flat amount.
- The max Magicka and Stamina increase from the ability and its morphs have been moved to Dark Magic, which will exist on the Blood Magic passive.
- Bound Armaments will have a higher chance of applying Sundered, so it reaches a closer power level to the Grim Focus morphs.
So you completely left out the fact that the Max Magicka/Stamina you shifted is hidden behind 3 conditional states. Why is this so convoluted?!
- Cast a Dark Magic skill.
- Be at full health.
- Lasts only 10 seconds.
You also left out the fact that Minor Force has been completely removed from all 3 Sorcerer skill lines. Why?
Bound Armaments starting at 3% status effect chance (single target dot) even though it's single target direct attack (10%), and going to 15% is hardly a buff, 5% more than what it should be is negligble at best. Jabs was also given improved status effect chance going from 5% to 15% for 3x, and it's an aoe spammable that can be used much more frequently. BA needs to be fixed, treated as 10% for base, and get the same 3x for 30% total.
I feel like U47 was just a bunch of neutral/horizontal changes that somehow resulted in nerfs despite acting like they're buffs. Reality is, no one is going to use Dark Magic or Daedric Summoning so you didn't really accomplish what you set out to do. Storm Calling although decent - great even, is right back to the place it started at.
