Best Of
Re: Mammoth
You have no concept of how happy a friend is about this mount. They would have jumped through whatever hoops required to have this mount.
They have wanted a mammoth mount for *years* and there will be no stopping them celebrating.
They have wanted a mammoth mount for *years* and there will be no stopping them celebrating.
Re: Mammoth
I already hate this mammoth. It’s too big, too loud, and blocks everyone’s view. I’m afraid it will cover everything in the crafting area.
No idea who came up with the weird idea to put something like this into the world.
At least it doesn’t have any unnecessary bling.
No idea who came up with the weird idea to put something like this into the world.
At least it doesn’t have any unnecessary bling.
Re: Will Vengeance be the new PVP model?
I have been around since late beta. If you look at the developement of cyro, its obvious that we have had a sucessive decline of people going to Cyro. At least PC/EU is now at the stage that there is any notable population only a few hours in the evening. Thus realistically cyro won't survive much longer without some changes.
The main problem most people mentions is the lag and the low pop. In addition it is extreemly hard for people new to Cyro to have fun, the gap between a noob and hardcore groups or good small scalers is far to big. When the game was new it were different there were a substantial gap but new players could still feel that they contributed.
Thus like it or not, if we want Cyro to survive, which I do, we need to accept substantial changes.
The main problem most people mentions is the lag and the low pop. In addition it is extreemly hard for people new to Cyro to have fun, the gap between a noob and hardcore groups or good small scalers is far to big. When the game was new it were different there were a substantial gap but new players could still feel that they contributed.
Thus like it or not, if we want Cyro to survive, which I do, we need to accept substantial changes.
LarsS
5
Re: Should there be a PvE only instance of Imperial City?
The issue is always players' attitude. 2 very different examples:
During Pan-Tamriel I was able to get IC Angler fishing with players from other alliances - good attitude.
During this Mayhem I got the Horror of Horrors achievement. Even for a single IC boss I had to jump between the four campaigns because every time I'd have taken the boss to 10% health the same players would run crashing me, yes, even on different campaigns - not good attitude.
And before someone says "PvP, innit?" No, even in PvP sports exists the concept of fair play. Preying behind a solo player that is not even willing to fight you and does everything in his power to avoid you, and following him in group wherever he goes to take advantage is not fair play, nothing to be proud of.
If it wasn't for this kind of players, I would personally be against the idea of a dedicated PvE instance, but since it's impossible to teach how to behave to players, I'm very much in favor: wanna PvP? Fight PvPers fairly. I can honestly enjoy if you smash me in a duel, I'll give you "GG" in an awe. Unfair game? I won't have a positive opinion about you.
During Pan-Tamriel I was able to get IC Angler fishing with players from other alliances - good attitude.
During this Mayhem I got the Horror of Horrors achievement. Even for a single IC boss I had to jump between the four campaigns because every time I'd have taken the boss to 10% health the same players would run crashing me, yes, even on different campaigns - not good attitude.
And before someone says "PvP, innit?" No, even in PvP sports exists the concept of fair play. Preying behind a solo player that is not even willing to fight you and does everything in his power to avoid you, and following him in group wherever he goes to take advantage is not fair play, nothing to be proud of.
If it wasn't for this kind of players, I would personally be against the idea of a dedicated PvE instance, but since it's impossible to teach how to behave to players, I'm very much in favor: wanna PvP? Fight PvPers fairly. I can honestly enjoy if you smash me in a duel, I'll give you "GG" in an awe. Unfair game? I won't have a positive opinion about you.
Mammoth
I was disappointed but unsurprised to see that the Mammoth mount will be a crown store item.
I had hoped it, along with the giant style outfit, would be golden pursuit rewards.
It would have been nice to introduce a new type of mount to the game in a way we could actually earn rather than buy.
I had hoped it, along with the giant style outfit, would be golden pursuit rewards.
It would have been nice to introduce a new type of mount to the game in a way we could actually earn rather than buy.
Altyri
10
Re: Assistant for survey maps
I already go out in the zones every day, for one thing or another, i.e. Endeavors, Golden Pursuits, etc.. Having to spend time gathering surveys takes away the time I would otherwise use for fun activities.
Re: Assistant for survey maps
This is a video game, not a job. Surveys offer no gameplay or thought. They are cookie clicker stuff designed to waste time and be a chore that feels too rewarding too pass up so that players spend time in the game. They expect it to clog up people's inventories because they know that a lot of people aren't going to enjoy doing it and won't want to do it everyday. This type of design is not something players should feel obligated to do to keep up with the player market.
I don't think the argument of "do your chores" is a particularly good argument for something that is supposed to be fun.
I don't think the argument of "do your chores" is a particularly good argument for something that is supposed to be fun.
Re: Herald of the Tome - Remove Fatecarver
Removing it is overkill, as it can be rather amusing to use.
It must simply be brought in line with others AOE skills.
Fatecarver is an anomaly, being a multitarget skill that's as powerfull as the best ST skills around.
Either by way of cutting the damage on secondary targets (like, by a lot .. 50% comes to mind) or reducind damage as a whole.
Both would be fine.
Agreeing with this. The ease of use of the class is fine, but other classes need the AoE of arcanist (good class spammable doing AoE damage) or arcanist needs reduced AoE to the level of other classes (balance it like jabs).
Soarora
8
Re: Herald of the Tome - Remove Fatecarver
Removing it is overkill, as it can be rather amusing to use.
It must simply be brought in line with others AOE skills.
Fatecarver is an anomaly, being a multitarget skill that's as powerfull as the best ST skills around.
Either by way of cutting the damage on secondary targets (like, by a lot .. 50% comes to mind) or reducind damage as a whole.
Both would be fine.
It must simply be brought in line with others AOE skills.
Fatecarver is an anomaly, being a multitarget skill that's as powerfull as the best ST skills around.
Either by way of cutting the damage on secondary targets (like, by a lot .. 50% comes to mind) or reducind damage as a whole.
Both would be fine.
preevious
11
Re: My problem with Solstice so far
I hate to say it (especially after West Weald, which I thought was brilliant), but the Solstice quests were badly written, derivative, and repetitive. The only quest that was any good was the one involving Meridia's temple in the north-west of the zone.
The zone itself feels lazily designed too - there's nothing to it.
I sincerely hope the rest of the "season" improves very significantly, because for what I have paid I have NOT seen good value. IMO, this year so far has been the absolute worst of ZoS.
The zone itself feels lazily designed too - there's nothing to it.
I sincerely hope the rest of the "season" improves very significantly, because for what I have paid I have NOT seen good value. IMO, this year so far has been the absolute worst of ZoS.
