Best Of
Re: Will ESO+ members get any compensation for the downtime during maintenance?
MarioMario wrote: »wolfie1.0. wrote: »
I have read the Terms of Service for ESO and ESO+. I am aware that they state access is not guaranteed.
However, as clearly acknowledged within the Terms themselves, these limitations are “subject to applicable law”.
Under the EU Directive 2019/770 a paid digital service must meet basic standards of availability and conformity. These are mandatory consumer rights and cannot be waived or overridden by a private contract — including terms of service.
So while ZeniMax may legally include such disclaimers in its ToS, they do not exempt the company from its legal obligations under European law, which protects consumers from paying for services they cannot access or reasonably use.
Therefore, I maintain my right to request compensation for the repeated service disruptions, in accordance with applicable consumer protection laws.
You're confusing Basic Standards of Availablity with Exacting Standards of Availability.
But hey, if you can prove otherwise, go ahead and sue for the .50cents you're out of pocket.
Can Companions be given the ability to swim?
It is a minor annoyance having your Companion disappear whenever you enter a body of water. I figure this must be some limitation of the pathfinding system that NPCs use, but maybe Companions can just swim in the direction of the player regardless of what obstacles may be in their way? Their combat ability would have to be disabled while they're in water, naturally.
I managed to capture a screenshot of Sharp-as-Night standing on a platform that is submerged in water. At this depth, a character would normally be doing swimming animations.
Now that we have mount swimming support in U47, can the same be given to Companions? @ZOS_Kevin
I managed to capture a screenshot of Sharp-as-Night standing on a platform that is submerged in water. At this depth, a character would normally be doing swimming animations.
Now that we have mount swimming support in U47, can the same be given to Companions? @ZOS_Kevin
Re: Do you want the old bgs back ?
The 3 way matches meant that even if you didn't get a strong group that let you steamroll the other team, there was still a chance you could accomplish something while the two stronger groups fought it out. Most of my experiences in the new BGs have been pretty much binary. Either you steamroll the other team or they steamroll you.
Tyrobag
9
Re: Warden Charm's cooldown needs to be increased
i really want them to just rework warden's class mastery into something different. i wish it had some kind of dps benefit in pve instead of being an obnoxious stun that (if it doesn't stun restores resources for some reason)
Re: The Crown Store has reached critical levels of immersion breakage
BagOfBadgers wrote: »You're right. Sorry should have said All MY TOONS have gotten their Soul back (30+ times) from kicking his backside (EU/NA PC). So having him as an “Pet” ON SOME OF THEM seems reasonable to me, as it's my Toons and their own lore. If that makes sense?
Every boss we defeat should not then become our "pet". That just diminishes our accomplishment if the boss we once beat is now nothing more than a dancing court jester.
Fix RoA now…Enough is enough
It’s ridiculous at this point. Please fix this set.
I don’t even need to say why.
Everyone who PvP knows why.
Fix it now. If you all at the studio PvP you should understand why this set is so broken.
Put a hard CC and call it a day.
Everyone and their grandmother runs this set in Cyro. Build diversity is dead with this set.
Pinball’ing is a new/has been a newer way to perma CC with RoA.
While I’m here, also make warden charm blockable and not glitch you through walls. Also make the aoe the correct dimensions. You can be slightly out of the aoe and it still charms.
I’m making this post to continue raising awareness of this problem that has yet to be fixed and not swept under the rug.
Thank you.
I don’t even need to say why.
Everyone who PvP knows why.
Fix it now. If you all at the studio PvP you should understand why this set is so broken.
Put a hard CC and call it a day.
Everyone and their grandmother runs this set in Cyro. Build diversity is dead with this set.
Pinball’ing is a new/has been a newer way to perma CC with RoA.
While I’m here, also make warden charm blockable and not glitch you through walls. Also make the aoe the correct dimensions. You can be slightly out of the aoe and it still charms.
I’m making this post to continue raising awareness of this problem that has yet to be fixed and not swept under the rug.
Thank you.
ercknn
12
Re: Necromancer summons are still bugged in PTS 11.1.3 despite the Flame Skull bug fix.
The limit is 10 in both PvE and PvP. The devs hotfixed the limit shortly after the last patch dropped.
The issue seems to be related to how corpses are getting replaced and counted (i.e., corpses arent properly being replaced, and its seems as though NPC corpses are counting towards the limit since the issue happens more in IC).
Honestly it's high time to replace the corpse system from the ground up.
If a class' core system causes performance issues, put in the work and change the system. Don't neuter the class with a nerf disguised as a band aid "fix".
The issue seems to be related to how corpses are getting replaced and counted (i.e., corpses arent properly being replaced, and its seems as though NPC corpses are counting towards the limit since the issue happens more in IC).
Honestly it's high time to replace the corpse system from the ground up.
If a class' core system causes performance issues, put in the work and change the system. Don't neuter the class with a nerf disguised as a band aid "fix".
Mammoth Legs Reversed on Character Select
I note this art bug hadn't been reported elsewhere, and so in the unfortunate category of "cannot unsee"! That rear leg placement is... not correct. The rear left crosses the right in a manner which suggests a mirrored pelvis? I have only observed this on the (gamepad) character select screen, and it only seems to affect the mammoth as far as I can tell. In-game, the mammoth's skeletal animations appear fine (indeed, rather delightful!).
Re: Please let the mammoth stay
FOMO doesn't work as a sales tactic if no one misses out. Sad but true. 
Re: Please let the mammoth stay
It's entirely your choice of course, and we have no idea what your situation is, but if you need to wait for your salary payment to be able to gather a few tens of dollars to spend, it sounds like you might wish to reconsider whether a purely cosmetic item for a computer game is really the best use of your funds? Naturally value and enjoyment are different for everyone, and this is coming from someone who just doesn't think this cosmetic is worth this amount of real-world money even when one can easily afford it.
I totally agree with this and I don't understand what problem other people have with it. I think it's very well put and polite. I guess, some people have spent way too much money on cosmetics in games and are easily triggered when they see something reasonable that contradicts with their lifestyle choices.
For me, my disdain of it goes back to neopets and them introducing neocash. The boards there were filled with 'why are people spending money on cosmetics! don't they know they could be donating that money to charity!' (yes, people were actually saying that the money should be donated)
Or telling people to pay their bills with the money, or spend it on something more 'worthwhile' (read: what the person who made the comment thought was a more worthwhile thing to spend money on)
We don't know other people's situation. It isn't up to us to treat other players like children who need reminders of whether or not they can afford something.
