YandereGirlfriend wrote: »

This set needs the full "against monsters" treatment and to be permanently banished to PvE-land where it belongs.

This set was created to blow up ball groups. Then ball groups complained. And it got nerfed, along with every single other set designed to blow up ball groups. Its almost as if players really do not want ball groups blown up.....

I mean I criticize ZOS a lot, but nothing forces you in this case to do any of this . If it’s to much just don’t do it and if you do otherwise sorry to say but that sounds like a you problem. I just leave out what I don’t want to do or don’t have timeto do. Should be pretty simple.

Hear hear. The RNG for antiquities absolutely needs to be revisited. Higher drop rates and/or (AND!) weighted RNG.

This is a major, huge, massive, pain point.

ETA: and STOP putting them in treasure maps. At least DLC treasure maps. Multiple RNGs is ... cruel.

Munkfist wrote: »

Personally, I hope it stays the way it is, but I understand not so many people may enjoy the slow grind and prefer instant gratification.

Instant gratification?

Definiton: Fulfilling a desire instantly without delay. Choosing quick, small rewards over long-term, larger benefits.

Doesn't apply in this case.

hello sharks. I believe I speak on behalf of the good people of the Elder Scrolls Online when I say that our quality of life would greatly improve if the "Commemorative Master Angler" anniversary achievement came with the "Fish Fear Me" title. thank you for your time, I'm seeking 500k equity for a 0.000005% stake.

I think you might feel differently if you actually needed the item. Imagine if it took us a year to get Velothi or RoPO. No one's asking for instant gratification, just fair treatment.

Mythics: 5-part antiquity, can be reconstructed after getting first codex.
Furnishings: up to 10-part antiquity; needs all 3 codices to be completed before able to purchase; some blue/green tier furnishings can't be purchased ever; some furnishings depend on two layers of RNG where you need to get the correct map, then to get the correct lead.

Gabriel_H wrote: »

For furniture - a non-gameplay changing item - you need 3 codex entries to unlock purchasing for gold, but for Mythics - a gameplay altering item - you only need 1 out of 3 codex entries for unlimited reconstructs with transmutes.

If we can reconstruct Mythics after obtaining the first codex, we should likewise be able to purchase all (including green and blue tiered ones) antiquity furnishings after completing the first codex.

It really is as simple as that.

I've literally progged hardmodes/trifectas in less time than it's taken me to get a lead I've actively been chasing. This feels very backwards and the system needs to change. Nobody is asking for things to be handed to them, what we want is a proper sense of progression and to get a fair reward for time/effort spent. I would love to see some sort of pity system or alternative ways to get a lead we want to work towards. I have tried for the bastion nymic lead 2-3x a day almost every day for over a year and still have not gotten it. This kind of rng is just unfun and frustrating, especially for leads you cannot farm alone (dungeons, trials, etc).

Odd they'd do that while they're also introducing solo dungeons

I think that's a good idea.

I know they don't allow us to reroll partially completed challenges to stop us using rerolls to get more points - get to 5/6 completions then reroll to a new challenge and keep doing that. But I think letting you cancel one so it drops out at the end of the week without being completed wouldn't have the same problem. If you did complete it you'd get a new one then anyway, so this wouldn't allow you to get more points, it would actually mean losing some. So it doesn't let you 'cheat the system' and does let players drop challenges they started but are never going to finish, making it a good compromise.

FurryCandyHearts wrote: »

yah i think if you need your curiousity satisfied, there's calixo's house of curiousities in skyrim to meet your taste. I'm of the opinion that asking someone their reason's why they are offended is just trolling for an argument. No thanks to that.

I'm not. You could have made the request without volunteering additional information then I suppose. I just found your reasoning unusual so was curious.

I looked at the rewards and had a very hard time figuring out what was wrong with them, but whatever.