msgeek
randconfig wrote: »1) See if the community agrees.tomofhyrule wrote: »What is the point of this poll?
2) Please provide sources where devs talk specifically to necromancer mains about the order of the reworks, because I have not seen or heard it. The last time we were talked to directly was a year ago, after they pushed class breaking bugs to live despite us repeatedly telling them not to for EVERY WEEK of the PTS, and then they said they would continue to communicate, but again, its been radio silence for a year (source: surprise surprise blastbones and animate blastbones ulti are unusable in pvp now.
3) Draw attention to the lastest PTS where we were advertised this:
but we are getting this:
4) 2 years is a long time to wait for anything of quality to be given to the only class I play. Just because of poor management of resources and Microslop's pursuit of AI garbage, I'm expected to just sit on the sidelines and wait for another 2 years (mind you we've received near nothing except nerf after nerf, bug after bug, since Necromancer's release in 2019, SEVEN YEARS AGO).
So that's the purpose of the poll, to make a very obvious point, SO AT THE VERY LEAST WE, SPECIFICALLY THE NECROMANCERS, GET SOME KIND OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE DEVS THAT THEY HAVE A PLAN AND THERE'S A GOOD REASON TO FORCING US TO WAIT A TOTAL 9 YEARS TO GET QUALITY CHANGES TO THE NECROMANCER. :-)
thesarahandcompany wrote: »Thumbless_Bot wrote: »thesarahandcompany wrote: »Thumbless_Bot wrote: »thesarahandcompany wrote: »Did you not read? There's was initially no guarantee or promise made.
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/66701?utm_source=chatgpt.com
"The traditional 4v4v4 game mode will no longer be available for queues; however, it may return in the future for limited times during special mini-PvP events. This new two-sided format also includes seven brand-new maps to battle your fellow players within."
Ever since the advent of 8v8/4v4 there was never any promise. You’re frustrated, which is fair but this isn’t something ZOS actually promised on a timeline. That's your fault for believing that out of your own hope to see something change that you wanted to see changed. Back in January they said 3-team BGs may return, likely in limited-time events. Not as a permanent feature. Not tied it to Seasons, April, or any specific update. That wasn’t a rollout announcement. It was basically “we’re exploring bringing it back.”
So the April roadmap not including 4v4v4 isn’t them delaying a promised feature. It’s consistent with what they’ve said the whole time. There's a communication issue, sure, but not a missed deadline.
Right now 4v4v4 is clearly in test it via events and see if it sticks, not core mode returning on schedule. And personally speaking? 4v4v4 was horrible. Would not want to see it come back. It just exacerbates the negative effects of certain playstyles and lack of role-based queues that already exist in the game.
I was initially curious where the vitriol was coming from.
Then you said this and it was clear: "And personally speaking? 4v4v4 was horrible. Would not want to see it come back".
Maybe what we need is less negativity towards each other based on our preferences and more comradery that the community, as small as it is, is getting something a lot of us want... perhaps?
It's cool that you prefer 2 teams. You should be able to enjoy that. Chrisilis and those of us that prefer 3 teams should be able to enjoy that and you not supporting that doesnt help anyone.
Just about every bg sweat became a bg sweat in 3 teams. So we must have all enjoyed them on some level. That shouldnt be a point of contention on these boards but that's all I see.
Let's spare calling it vitriol. I find it particularly annoying that someone made a post complaining that the devs didn't "deliver on a promise" that they never actually made.
My tone has nothing to do with my preference of game mode. It has everything to do with coming on forums and pitching a fit over not getting what OP wants and then having the audacity to claim that they promised OP that we would get what OP said they want. I understand you think this is about my game mode preference, but you're wrong.
So let's try not to deflect from the fact that OP is in fact wrongly remembering things and outraged over a promise they never got and that your neat theory about my tone has nothing to do with that at all.
Maybe I should change my name from Sarah to Seth so maybe I won't get tone policed on forums.
I cant speak for anyone else but I sure couldn't extract an intelligible name from your id. Maybe caps at the start of words or underscores before... if it's important to you, which it certainly isnt for me. Call yourself whatever you want. Call me whatever you want. Either way, just try to be nice maybe. That was my point and it doesnt seem to have gotten across. We all love bgs and we are an exceedingly small community Let's all, me included, try to keep that in mind and be nice to each other.
Should I smile more too? Wondering when you're going to actually address any points or just keep policing my behavior. At this point it feels like you’re avoiding the actual point. Was there a promise made, yes or no? If not, then there’s nothing to be delayed. Posts like OPs that frame something as a broken promise when it wasn’t are exactly what create unnecessary frustration and animosity among the player base. Let's get some discernment. And stop framing my asking for some discernment as being "not nice." Or whatever.
Hey all! We are actively looking at the places where these issues have been reported, and are hitting the fixes as time allows. You'll see the first round in our U50 PTS patch notes.
We are also considering a systemic solve to make it easier for players to access these post-quest, but that tool hasn't been built yet. I would strongly, strongly recommend that when you encounter these issues in-game that you use /bug. This gives us better info on how to track them down/resolve.