A lot of the suggestions and criticisms here over the years have been from players who think that because "Feature X" is in their favourite Guild WoWs XIV game it must also be introduced into ESO, but ESO is ESO and a lot of people have played it over the years precisely because of that. If they had wanted to play some other game they'd have done so. Some of us are criticised for opposing suggested changes, but we are simply guilty of liking the game as it is and so we are likely to disagree with most of the criticisms of the game and the related changes that get suggested. That leads to a healthy discussion which is in itself good for the game.

I personally dislike some aspects of the game, some of them original features like the guild trader system, others more recent like account-wide achievements, but so long as the game continues to tick enough boxes for me then I'll continue both to play it and to subscribe to it (on multiple accounts).

... play on Playstation.

I see a lot of players everywhere every day in many areas of Tamriel, and I play with many other players.
If there are any more, it will get way too crowded and only lead to performance issues (as is already the case with some events).

If I've acquired copies of houses on both PC EU and PC NA, how would that work during crossplay? Would all my characters have access to both versions of the house? Would all players be able to create multiple versions of a house even if they only play on a single platform? In general how would content which is currently earned or purchased by platform be handled? Think major Golden Pursuit rewards, hairstyles, costumes, pets, and motifs purchased from the crown store, and lots of other things I'm sure I'm not thinking of right off.

I currently rather like having two separate sets of characters, each with their own sets of relationships and upgrades. It's not that I'm opposed to new companions, but I wouldn't want to lose the benefits of separation, either. Would my NA characters automatically become members of my EU guild? Would it mean merged achievements? I guess I'm not really sure what crossplay would entail--and would need to know more before forming an opinion.

Option 5: Don't care as long as it doesn't break the game.

The game technology already culls people in overland, so if there were a million more people in Vulkhel Guard, it would look pretty much the same as it does today.

I expect that queue times for dungeons would be shorter because it would collect the people that do that sort of thing. I think part of the problem with dungeon queue times is the number of people that actually do that, so getting more of them together can't hurt. I probably queue for a dungeon a couple dozen times per year, so this would impact me at those times.

I am not the target audience for cross play, so I guess I am "happy" as long as it doesn't break the game. I do not expect to be happy if they do this.

joergino wrote: »

I'm sure they would move the "central" server to Iceland or a newly-created floating island in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

I would suggest Atlantis, but then no one would be able to find the server.

tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »

The new Rush of Agony works way better for the old proc build I've had for a few Updates now. I think this change might overall be a nerf, but making it a ground-based pull has its perks for planning a burst combo.

Though I feel like I notice some targets getting the "pull" animation but not going all the way towards the middle, just closer to it. Or even not moving at all. And not targets on the CC cooldown, but even fresh target.

For times when you might only hit 1-2 targets, it's performing better for my particular setup.

i dont know. its work badley. i use it with malestorm gun from back + Blazing Spear from front. and that not work correct. Attractions often don't work. the center set stopped attracting in u46. I don't know what they did to it, but the set is broken. It's easier to bypass it than DC. If use it in conjunction with Celestix, it's about the same.

ZOS this set has made enough sales to ruin it. Instead of doing something with the ball groups, you ruined the set.

ruskiii wrote: »

MincMincMinc wrote: »

ZOS_Kevin wrote: »

MincMincMinc wrote: »

@ZOS_Kevin You should let them know we also want to get rid of the MMR reset. There are like 10 threads on this issue already. Its killing the game for a lot of newer players when you have us sweaty players going 50/0 every match because we are stuck being qued against these people every other month.

We have shared the note on MMR reset in the past. Happy to do so again. My understanding is additional tech work needs to be done to make that happen. But I do not have a status on that right now.

@ZOS_Kevin Nice, like Ruskii said Resetting mmr is the main factor in terms of ruining new player experience in bgs. It directly leads to pugstomping, spawncamping, and making players afk in spawn.

As discussed in other threads it may make sense to make mmr not reset and be account wide, especially now that subclassing requires us to change characters/classes for simple build purposes like swapping skills.

Honestly I think account based MMR would over sanitize the lobbies. I've said it before but theres nothing wrong getting your ass kicked by a better player on an alt for a few games before their MMR gain accelerates and puts them in a higher bracket. It is a problem when a new player is expected to deal with whole teams of better players for months and months on end because MMR doesn't have enough time to create any meaningful distinctions between player groups.

We are in the last week of August, and I am only just now noticing a real separation of the lower/mid tier mmr brackets this month. I took a character id not played for month into BGs and everyone was unfamiliar names with <1000CP. Those players need to have that lower bracket to learn/get their dailies done.

Please ZOS, stop resetting MMR.

Well I suppose once you stop resetting MMR it starts to drastically matter what mmr is based on. Whether the metrics actually represent a player's skill. Maybe dont have it necessarily account bound, but if I have one character at say an mmr of 80/100 maybe my other characters begin at 60/100 or something of that sort.

ESO "skill" has two metrics. Build theory and Technical skills. For the most part technical skills hardly change between playstyle now adays, since everyone is stuck playing the turtle and burst proc/ult playstyle. Then build theory mostly sticks aswell between characters, maybe someone has a hard time figuring out where to get all the buffs when trying a new subclass, but again for the most part you are still 80-90% the way there. It isnt like the old days where a regen sustained damage magblade player was drastically different from a deficit sustain timed burst magsorc player or even close to a deficit dizzy stamsorc

Correct. You have to have finished each of the Wing quests to unlock the ability for Ink to drop from corresponding sources (ie.. Wing of the Netch enables Ink to drop from Resource Nodes).

Upon unlocking, ink drops are account wide though.

The same thing is happening today, PC EU. A seemingly random sequence of error 103, 307 and the server not being reachable. The last time this happened earlier, it took about twenty minutes to get back in again. Internet is obviously working, just ESO acting up. As it does so often.

Booted from the server for the 500th time. Can't log in for 10 mins. Nothing to do with excess server requests. Always happens late on in the evening and is ruining this game for me.

It takes so little effort to add something nice to the daily rewards. Since I've been playing solidly for the last two years there has always been something to look forward to in the daily rewards, the last two months there has been nothing, it's mostly junk that I won't ever use except for the XP scrolls. This is indicative of a company that's lost interest in its players I'm afraid.