El_Borracho wrote: »Cooperharley wrote: »El_Borracho wrote: »Pyrebrand is a decent DK set in PVP and PVE, especially on a bow build.
*was a decent set before u44. Now it's not. ZOS took a sledgehammer to it per usual rather than a slight nerf, or even better, BUFFING other lesser-used sets.
The only thing in IA worth farming IMO are the class style pages for the class sets and the maligraphic horse mount if you haven't received that yet. After that, there's no incentive in my book.
Welp, that's a bummer.
spartaxoxo wrote: »I don't think a customer should be worse off just because they wanted to enjoy the story. Everyone should be able to enjoy an experience that is fun and rewarding. I hope devs consider that vet players don't deserve to be punished for wanting to enjoy a story. That enabling the feature shouldn't feel like you're doing something bad to your account. That it should not put you at a disadvantage to other players that choose not to use this feature.
I should be able to actually enjoy the story of the defeat of the Ascendant Lord and do my crafting writs at the exact same pace as everyone else is doing it and that I have always done it. Equality is not abuse.
Yes, absolutely. I'd also go so far as to say that only 0.001% of players, or those with billions in gold, will ever get the complete codex. Which is a massive shame, because when you think about it, the antiquity codices add to lore, so we are depriving 99.99% of players not just of furnishings but of TES lore.Most people who aren't specifically buying maps with gold or grinding archival fortunes are simply not going to see these furnishings at all, because a threshold like "7.5 million gold worth of maps" or "30 days of dedicated grinding" are beyond the means of about 90% of the playerbase. I think they should know why this has been designed specifically to bar them, if it is, indeed, intentional.
By the way: If you've got 40+ Ayleid trees in the last 8 months, that means you've been digging them up. You do get that resets the RNG pool and makes the lead available to drop again, right? The RNG rolls for "Does lead drop?" and then rolls for "Which lead drops excluding ones the player has yet to dig up?"
SilverBride wrote: »
Mothers sorrow is a crit set. The reason you wear mothers sorrow is for crit rating.
Total crit rating for Sorrow : 2842
Total crit rating for Highland Sentinel WITH NO STACKS : 2957
Highland has more crit with no stacks. Even if you have no stacks, it's better than sorrow and you can have it in any armour weight.
Leviathan is the same set as Sorrow, so it's ALSO bad. No one should use these sets now that Highland exists.
I've already made the point that Spider cultist is worse at buffing force pulse than Tide-Born. 600 spell damage is not as good as 12% damage done to monsters, and spider cult only buffs destro staff skills.
These old sets are very easy to compare, because they are just straight up numbers. It's not some fancy proc or condition or whatever where you need to compare something.
one set has bigger numbers and that set is better.
further more, both sets are crafted sets, the easiest set to obtain. I'll make anyone a set of purple tide-born or highland in any weight with any non-nirn trait they want.
The old sets need to be looked at.
Spider Cult should be STOMPING tide-born for damage done with force pulse. It does one thing and it does it poorly.
This is gas lighting
This statement is demonstrably false.
There is no situation where anyone should use Spider Cult. Not PvP, not overland, not dungeons, not trials.
This is not the only set in the game where we can point to the fact that no one should use it. Ever. It's just the first example that came to mind.