Best Of
“Joining Encounter in Progress” should have a confirmation check
The “Joining Encounter in Progress” port to dungeon bosses should have a confirmation check. Groups should be able to let their speedrunner die alone, without the certainty that their group will port in to help.
With a confirmation check, people who do want to skip the entire dungeon and get pulled from boss to boss can, and people who don’t want to don’t have to.
With a confirmation check, people who do want to skip the entire dungeon and get pulled from boss to boss can, and people who don’t want to don’t have to.
Reverb
35
Re: TODAYS DAILY ENDEAVOR SAYS TO DEAL 200K IN DAMAGE IN PVP
Thats like 2-3 ballista bolts aimed at the zerg
robpr
7
Re: [REQUEST] Permanent Vengeance Test Campaign
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »Could keeping Vengeance 4 on live be viable?
Let's say, once V4 is on live in December, it remains accessible until after the V5 PTS testing. Then, if necessary, it goes down for a week or two to allow for adding new features.
Would it lead to an avalanche of support tickets about corrupted characters and items missing from inventories?
Would it make players complain about new features because they got used to a certain ruleset?
Would it trigger even more complaints about unbalanced classes and skills?
No. ZOS isn't going to support two different versions of cyodiil long term. They're just not going to. Sooner or later it will be one or the other, and vengeance isn't going to fly with the current PvP players, and the PvE players won't play vengeance either. They don't like PvP or they'd already be playing it.
Why is this so hard to understand for the vengeance supporters? This is why vengeance has to be opposed in every possible way at every opportunity.
Then why did so many PvE players who hate GreyHost played and enjoyed Vengeance?
Them not playing PvP doesn’t mean they do not like any PvP, only that they dislike current PvP. Otherwise „GreyHost players don‘t like PvP or they would play Vengeance“ would be true. Players just like different version of PvP.
There are quite a few current and a lot more former PvPer preferring Vengeance (but that probably autoturns them into nonPvPer).
Nobody wanting to play Vengeance is „hard to understand“for Vengeance supporters because they’re living prove it is not true.
Well, at least you are realizing that vengeance is popular with the PvE community. The PvP community almost without exception hates vengeance. People who like PvP are already playing PvP. Vengeance will not, ever, under any circumstances, bring new players to ESO. It will do the opposite. It will drive away the few PvP players left.
And to answer your question, the PvE players populated vengeance because there was an associated Golden Pursuit. Once they had their pursuit completed they left and never came back.
Realizing PvEr like it doesn’t mean PvPer do not.
Many players from both PvP and PvE clearly said they enjoyed Vengeance and not enjoy Grey Host. Many PvPer have stopped PvP because of issues nonexistent in Vengeance. Liking PvP doesn’t mean you like ballgroups, procsets, subclassing, metachasing or fights decided before they begin.
When PvEr miss out end of campaign reward they can also miss out golden pursuit giving only ap and gold. Golden pursuit can’t mobilize as many players as there were.
Does not playing Vengeance mean that you don’t like PvP because otherwise you would play Vengeance or does it mean you just do not like Vengeance? If it means you dislike only Vengeance and not all PvP than why does players not liking/playing Grey Host mean they dislike and won’t play Vengeance either?
(even when they said they like and play it)?
The vast majority of the PvP players loathe vengeance. Players who want to play PvP are already playing it. Vengeance wont bring in any new players that will stick around more than a week or two.
Re: [REQUEST] Permanent Vengeance Test Campaign
MorallyBipolar wrote: »
That's because you're not a PvP player.
The problem is that ZOS is acting like their intention is to make vengeance the only PvP option in Cyrodiil just like they made 2 team BG's the only option.
The current Cyrodiil isn't bringing any new players to PvP either. On the contrary, even with drastically reduced pop caps GH isn't pop locked most of the time, BR is barely kicking and the other two campaigns are basically dead. It's been quite some time I didn't see PvPers complaining about queue lenghts. The last WSM saw the lowest participation ever, and I'm pretty sure PvEers got out as soon as they got their tickets from a single scouting quest, while before they used to hang around for much longer, be it in towns or in pugs.
ZOS is acting like their intention is to develop a new mode while saying they are just testing some performance fixes.
Vengeance haters are acting like the current Cyrodiil is so broken that there's nothing else to do but to scrap it entirely.
Re: Would you like Zerith Var's favour to not be hidden behind winning a ToT match?
I don't have Zerith Var, but I don't think anything should require ToT that isn't directly related to ToT, such as leads etc..
Re: Mage's Guild and Fighter's Guild abilities Vengeance Sept 2025
I've pulled these from PTS v4, which if they aren't changing those skills inbetween v3 and v4 should be what we're using for v3 on Monday -- so for anyone prepping ahead of monday here are the skills:
Mage's Guild:
Fighter's Guild:
They are just lazy resnips of my discord copy-pastes, so if anyone needs the full images of the skills rather than the mushed together images let me know and I'll take the time to copy-paste them singularly
Mage's Guild:
Fighter's Guild:
They are just lazy resnips of my discord copy-pastes, so if anyone needs the full images of the skills rather than the mushed together images let me know and I'll take the time to copy-paste them singularly
Re: Would you like Zerith Var's favour to not be hidden behind winning a ToT match?
I understand that it is part of lore and the world, but I just hate this game. I don't understand it, have no idea what I am doing when I play, and it just goes on and on until I forfeit or lose. It's a shame because Zerith is my favorite companion by far.
Re: Rich Lambert's Comments About The Current State of Balance
The meta shouldn’t be the easiest way to play and it also shouldn’t be way ahead of more difficult to play alternatives. That seems pretty obvious to me.
But what do I know.
I just get tired of watching game companies ruin some of my favorite games and franchises. That’s been a real problem over the past decade. Hope ESO isn’t the next to fall.
But what do I know.
I just get tired of watching game companies ruin some of my favorite games and franchises. That’s been a real problem over the past decade. Hope ESO isn’t the next to fall.
Malprave
10
Re: West Weald Treasure Map Leads are Bugged
Still trying to get 3rd lead from West Weald for Ayleid Window. I was up to 2 leads year ago, after that nothing. I've collected hundreds of WW treasure maps. I've used maybe 200-300k archival fortunes to buy WW maps (they were on vendor earlier this year and again last week), I spent all my Telvars when the maps were on Imperial City vendor. I've bought them from players, gotten them as loot. I'd assume I've gone through at least 500-600 maps and no lead. In fact last week when I burnt through dozens of them, only lead I got was the damn grand tree.
Re: West Weald Treasure Map Leads are Bugged
Kalevalatar wrote: »Still trying to get 3rd lead from West Weald for Ayleid Window. I was up to 2 leads year ago, after that nothing. I've collected hundreds of WW treasure maps. I've used maybe 200-300k archival fortunes to buy WW maps (they were on vendor earlier this year and again last week), I spent all my Telvars when the maps were on Imperial City vendor. I've bought them from players, gotten them as loot. I'd assume I've gone through at least 500-600 maps and no lead. In fact last week when I burnt through dozens of them, only lead I got was the damn grand tree.
Its the same story again and again, and yet some bad faith people just call that "bad rng" :')
Asdara
1