Yes please, this was the main way I did operations ( trials ) in swtor, and it was fun, plus was a nice way to meet groups willing to group later for vet stuff.
I remember when Warcraft added in the raid finder. They tiered the rewards so that the finder drops were less powerful all around. If ESO added something like this, there would be screams, but it'd be the right thing to do. Then again, vets will tell you that raid finder ruined muh Warcraft, so someone will hate it no matter what.
(Honestly I am still unsure why people just don’t find a guild for this. I am in a two guilds that have traders, open (normal) trial groups, and no dues or other obligations other than just logging once every two weeks or so.)
I get why people don’t want to join guilds (kinda), but not wanting to join a guild but wanting to do large group content makes me scratch my head.
wookiefriseur wrote: »Yes, but not with the current LFG tool. It automates too many steps that would make the grouping too inflexible.
The purpose should be to connect trial groups with potential party members.
They could use a UI similar to guild search, with activity filters. And instead of guilds it could show activity, current party size, required roles and a "request invite" button. It could even check for min CP and require certain achievements, because links can be faked.
Here is a quick mockup:
Yes please, this was the main way I did operations ( trials ) in swtor, and it was fun, plus was a nice way to meet groups willing to group later for vet stuff.
In SWTOR, people formed groups before queueing so it was not a GF group. Rarely would they queue with a mostly filled group, but even then most of the group was pre-made. Completely random groups failed.
It has always been this way since they added raids and is still this way.
Tbh the most important thing about fake roles is: players don’t do it because they mean, clueless or toxic but because most of normal dungeons are so easy they don’t need healers or tanks at all. Game enticing such behavior even further by fastest transmute farm for pve with short queue for support. That’s why most of them leaving as soon as they see something harder than base game ones as they know they can’t handle dlcs, even though some of them shorter but with hard hitting bosses. Rarely i did see someone tried to fake tank in vet and if i did they also claimed that they believed this dungeon is too easy for needing a tank and i’d never encountered fake roles in vet dlcs when i tried to pug them. Inexperienced players? Yes, but not fake..
"Why don't you just join a guild???"
1) People who say this are obviously not regularly playing endgame bc if you were you'd know that guild trial rosters often fill with non guildies and being in a guild doesn't guarantee you a spot in raid.
Yes, that's the whole point of a finder: to fill when needed and on your own schedule when you can't make guild raid time or don't get a spot. It's a useful tool for those who want to use it. If you're averse for any reason, just don't use it. It will not affect you."Why don't you just join a guild???"
1) People who say this are obviously not regularly playing endgame bc if you were you'd know that guild trial rosters often fill with non guildies and being in a guild doesn't guarantee you a spot in raid.
Guild trial rosters fill with non-guildies pretty much if they cannot get someone from the guild. So this is a non-issue most of the time when their are people looking to go into the raid.
Same with it not being guaranteed a spot in the raid. If there are enough to form a second group then that will likely happen. Those that show interest can be brought into the raid the next time.
What's your current experience with this? Sincere question bc I see this argument a lot, but in my experience, 7 out of 10 runs I lead are fine.You get out of this what you put into it which is why random GF groups for raids are often very bad which is why adding such a feature is bad for business.