StamPlar_1976 wrote: »Never. They love the casuals too much to bat an eye at us.
Awww why everyone disagreeing, cmon wouldn't it be fun if we had something new for pvp.
Awww why everyone disagreeing, cmon wouldn't it be fun if we had something new for pvp.
Its not quite disagreeing, I would say that pretty much all PvP players would like some new stuff for PvP.
Its just that it is incredibly unlikely that ZOS is ever going to release any kind of real PvP content again, because from how they acted about that the last years made it quite obvious that they dont care about the PvP side of the game.
Lady_Galadhiel wrote: »A dlc? I could see that happening in a few years maybe,I mean a chapter is very unlikely but a dlc why not ^^
zelaminator wrote: »StamPlar_1976 wrote: »Never. They love the casuals too much to bat an eye at us.
Is every PvE player a casual to you, since you speak like that? Because I dare say that the Leaderboard PvE players are easily just as dedicated as the PvP players
VaranisArano wrote: »Maybe after ZOS fixes Cyrodiil performance. So probably never.
I mean, what is ZOS going to do?
A. Any sort of large scale combat is going to have the same issues as Cyrodiil.
B. For small scale combat, we've got Battlegrounds, which doesn't even have a large enough population to support all the queues people want.
C. Imperial City is pretty unpopular for something that was supposed to an end game for PvPvE - it favors niche builds and is very unfriendly for casual
and inexperienced PVPers.
What's left? Free for all? I'm not sure ESO is very well balanced for that.
Majority of DLCs are all dedicated to PVE content, theres only like 1 DLC dedicated to PvP which is imperial city and that has been there ages ago. It would be super cool if the next dlc is completely PvP with rewards based on pvp content.
Emmagoldman wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Maybe after ZOS fixes Cyrodiil performance. So probably never.
I mean, what is ZOS going to do?
A. Any sort of large scale combat is going to have the same issues as Cyrodiil.
B. For small scale combat, we've got Battlegrounds, which doesn't even have a large enough population to support all the queues people want.
C. Imperial City is pretty unpopular for something that was supposed to an end game for PvPvE - it favors niche builds and is very unfriendly for casual
and inexperienced PVPers.
What's left? Free for all? I'm not sure ESO is very well balanced for that.
Totally agree with point A.
With point B, how do you calculate BG population?
For IC/Sewers, I'm so glad that it picked up over the last year and 1/2. Hopefully they can keep adding interesting awards to keep it relevant.
StamPlar_1976 wrote: »Never. They love the casuals too much to bat an eye at us.
No pvp lead at ZOS, no pvp content. Don't expect much.
StamPlar_1976 wrote: »Never. They love the casuals too much to bat an eye at us.
Has Zenimax been able to monetize PvP? The only DLC with PvP I have seen in Imperial City and it is usually dead space and it seems Zos had to give it away. Every other aspect of PvP is part of the base game so it does nothing for bringing in continued revenue.
Majority of DLCs are all dedicated to PVE content, theres only like 1 DLC dedicated to PvP which is imperial city and that has been there ages ago. It would be super cool if the next dlc is completely PvP with rewards based on pvp content.
Probably not until the game has enough active PvPers who are happy with the game and give the developers a reason to invest in new PvP content, rather than just complaining that Cyrodiil is broken, Imperial City is pointless, Battlegrounds are useless and dueling isn't worth bothering with. That may be paraphrasing the generality of PvP posts on this forum but not by much.
Probably not until the game has enough active PvPers who are happy with the game and give the developers a reason to invest in new PvP content, rather than just complaining that Cyrodiil is broken, Imperial City is pointless, Battlegrounds are useless and dueling isn't worth bothering with. That may be paraphrasing the generality of PvP posts on this forum but not by much.
PvP players complain about cyro performance because it is horrible, not just for the "joy of complaining". Performance has been horrendous for over three years now. Your post is a slap to the face of every PvP player and an attempt to discount the legitimacy of their complaints.
If Zenimax would fix some of the performance issues, people would stop complaining. Until things are fixed, people will likely, and should continue complaining. When things are very broken, customers can and should point out that they are broken.
The problem isn't the players pointing out there are performance issues. The problem is Zenimax is failing in any of their efforts to fix their game; and failing at a level that makes it difficult to believe they are even trying to fix the majority of the performance issues.