I don't get the complaints about the number of housing slots. People sound like they either only have one house or that they must have every furnishing item displayed in every one of their houses. I doubt very much that anyone fits into the first category (not least with the free houses and inn rooms available) and I don't see the reasoning behind the second category. If they list all their houses and total up all the furnishing slots between them do they really not have enough? Even those players who build their own house within a house seem to be able to cope just fine judging by the screenshots and videos we see all the time.
Ravensilver wrote: »
The house is not free. You *must* have bought Greymoor, or you would not get access to it. Also, everyone that helped the community achieve this, donated person-hours to this. If you were to put a price on those player hours that were invested, you wouldn't be able to afford it.
So it isn't free. ZOS has just declined to as a price in addition to what we have already paid for it.
furiouslog wrote: »I'm actually happy that it's 600. 100 more slots is not going to make or break the house. I'm surprised that you're complaining about what is essentially a free gift to the community. Just enjoy it.
That's what I was getting at with my last point. They seem to do fine judging by the screenshots and videos.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »
I paid for Greymoor, this house was not part of the transaction therefore the House is free.
Ravensilver wrote: »
So far I've collected 24 tables of all types. I'm not really sure what I'm going to do with 24 Solitude tables... *ponders*
Ravensilver wrote: »Proudspire is a Classic home and has 600, Hall of the Lunar Champion is Notable and has 700. So either this house was not put into the correct category, or they forgot to update it to 700 slots.
And to be honest, I sure could use those 100 extra slots... ^^;;
Ya, my favorite house has always been the amaya lake lodge. Id say this is now my favorite house but I have the same problem with it.
With roughly 130+ collectible items, like undaunted trophies, busts, achievement furnishings, and statues, 40 slots is just not enough. Not at all. The less house guests is a huge downer, but i could tolerate it, im not looking for a guild house.
The special furnishing limit of 8 is another huge downer, considering 4 of those will be the banker, merchant, fence, and this new NPC (at least for me). Then you have room for 4 mounts/pets. That sucks, but i could tolerate it.
And having 100 less furnishings sucks too, but 700 isnt even close to enough for a large notable home so 100 less for a slightly smaller home isnt a huge deal to me. Although id say this house is comparable to other notable homes, like the daggerfall overlook, so I dont really understand it.
Regardless the biggest thing for me, again, is the collectible furnishing limit. I think, at least, they should upgrade that in classic and maybe even staple homes.
AyeshaBelladonna wrote: »Yes the category limits in general suck, yes the size of the home screams Notable to many of us based on the layout alone..... but the real concern here should honestly be that we need confirmation as to whether it IS a bug with the listing, and the listing is in error and will be fixed ASAP. Because if this is NOT, if it is an intentional change to the status quo.... we have bigger things to worry about than “is ZOS ever going to raise our caps”.
CaffeinatedMayhem wrote: »PC/NA (gamepad mode)
CaffeinatedMayhem wrote: »PC/NA (gamepad mode)
"You will have to choose between what is right and what is easy" - Dumbledore.
I'm sad they are choosing the easy route - again.
Well, that's one more house that will be used as an extra furniture deposit. What a shame.
At least I will be able to devote more time to my Stillwater Retreat, got to keep positive thinking here.
ZOS_SarahHecker wrote: »Hey all, for those of you who are seeing it as a notable home what platform are you on? (If you can snag a screenshot that would be appreciated.) It should be listed under the classic homes.
Ravensilver wrote: »Am I wrong in resenting the fact that 90 of the 600 slots are already taken up with stuff that ZOS put there? >.< And it's all bound, so I can't even sell it? >.>