vampires look good as they are now. They look ghostly, undead, and horrifying, as they should be. Looks realistic and logical. I don't want a vampire to look beautiful. They have dead bodies, cold blood, and suffer. They can't look sunny and warm.
vampires look good as they are now. They look ghostly, undead, and horrifying, as they should be. Looks realistic and logical. I don't want a vampire to look beautiful. They have dead bodies, cold blood, and suffer. They can't look sunny and warm.
Likewise! I don't think anyone here wants vampires to look beautiful. As it was revealed, vampires will get more ugly the more powerful they are. Which is good, right?
I'm personally really excited for this change.
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
Thevampirenight wrote: »vampires look good as they are now. They look ghostly, undead, and horrifying, as they should be. Looks realistic and logical. I don't want a vampire to look beautiful. They have dead bodies, cold blood, and suffer. They can't look sunny and warm.
Likewise! I don't think anyone here wants vampires to look beautiful. As it was revealed, vampires will get more ugly the more powerful they are. Which is good, right?
I'm personally really excited for this change.
I'd rather they make vampires look like stage one does now when well fed but reverse the vampirism so you must be well fed to be most powerful. I'd prefer that over having to look like a sith lord when well fed.
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
I'm unaware of what content requires 17 characters to be at their very best at all times. Please elaborate?
Also another solution for you would be to just not play vampire, right? If it's that much of an annoyance.
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
I am assuming they are going to make Vampires closer to Werewolves in terms of being a choice. Instead of "Stamina Sorc - with 10% extra regen" - You will be - Stamina Sorc - Vampire build. It will probably eat into the skill line making 17 vamps similar if you had 17 Werewolf only DPS. Not that exciting. As I doubt they will keep the extra stat bonus, but make it a true playstyle.
Thevampirenight wrote: »vampires look good as they are now. They look ghostly, undead, and horrifying, as they should be. Looks realistic and logical. I don't want a vampire to look beautiful. They have dead bodies, cold blood, and suffer. They can't look sunny and warm.
Likewise! I don't think anyone here wants vampires to look beautiful. As it was revealed, vampires will get more ugly the more powerful they are. Which is good, right?
I'm personally really excited for this change.
I'd rather they make vampires look like stage one does now when well fed but reverse the vampirism so you must be well fed to be most powerful. I'd prefer that over having to look like a sith lord when well fed.
Im hoping that by more ugly when we're well fed they mean something akin to how vampires in Skyrim look. A final stage vampire looks quite spooky.
I hope this give us the bat facial features that would be neat :O
MornaBaine wrote: »
I hope this give us the bat facial features that would be neat :O
I'd love to see a wider range of possible appearances across the board honestly. From normal mortal to, yes, the bat face you suggest. The various bloodlines spoken of in the lore have a very wide range of appearances and powers and while I know it would be completely impractical for them to come up with new powers for each one it'd be a heck of a lucrative cash store project for them if they'd start offering skins for the various lore strains so people could have their pick of their favorite kinds of vampires, at least in the looks department!
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
Im not looking forward to feeding 17 Vampires. Im glad the skill line was reworked but feeding before content runs is going to be time consuming or expensive. I guess we'll see where this goes.
Crom_CCCXVI wrote: »PVP TRADEOFFS
Along with incentive to be a Vampire, there should be incentive not too. In the PvP community there is very little incentive to not be a vamp with regen, damage mititagtion, mist form, Accel Drain is a great skill
Maybe a Vampire Hunter set? with significantly increased damage VS Vampire, that or bring back the power in those glyphs?
ZOS f'ing with the lore is my biggest concern. Lord Harkon is the first Vampire Lord, a power given to him by Molag Bal. Lord Harkon is the first of his bloodline so if Vampire Lord is the new ultimate, I'm gonna be disappointed.
vampires look good as they are now. They look ghostly, undead, and horrifying, as they should be. Looks realistic and logical. I don't want a vampire to look beautiful. They have dead bodies, cold blood, and suffer. They can't look sunny and warm.
Likewise! I don't think anyone here wants vampires to look beautiful. As it was revealed, vampires will get more ugly the more powerful they are. Which is good, right?
I'm personally really excited for this change.
ZOS f'ing with the lore is my biggest concern. Lord Harkon is the first Vampire Lord, a power given to him by Molag Bal. Lord Harkon is the first of his bloodline so if Vampire Lord is the new ultimate, I'm gonna be disappointed.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »ZOS f'ing with the lore is my biggest concern. Lord Harkon is the first Vampire Lord, a power given to him by Molag Bal. Lord Harkon is the first of his bloodline so if Vampire Lord is the new ultimate, I'm gonna be disappointed.
The thing is we were led to believe the LDB not only defeated the First Dragon, the First Dragonborn but also the First Vampire Lord, you see Harkon had enough power that you needed a god weapon to break his shield and not one single mention of that form had existed in any form of TES media prior, not to mention he sacrificed 1000 souls for that power to be bestowed upon him and his family, if all pureblooded Vampires had that form then why even bother with the sacrifices? just have Valerica or Serana turn him, the fact is this massively diminishes Lord Harkon's importance as a villain and therefor diminishes what the LDB had achieved, hell if the mask of Alkosh and it's obvious attempt at being Dragon Aspect wasn't bad enough.
The Lore presented in Numbered Titles made by Bethesda should take priority over the Lore presented in a Spin-Off so if ESO contradicts something from Skyrim, since Skyrim is actually a main game of the series it's lore should take priority and the contradiction made should be ignored, if the Spin-Off presents something that does not cause a contradiction then by all means accept it.