Do you like the changes to the bridges and milegates?

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO · October 2018

Just interested whether people are enjoying the changes made to bridges and milegates.

susmitds · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

It looks good on paper, but is useless against zergs. You can repair them faster than anyone can damage it. 3 guys can repair them enough to be passable in 6 secs.

frozywozy · October 2018

Too soon to make an opinion. What I can say is that it looks like something nice for a very active map (primetime during the weekend) but won't change much the rest of the time.

Theignson · October 2018

No

I find it tedious.
I also don't like how ZOS broke the 3 fold symmetry of the map by sticking EP with a town sticking into AD territory (Crops) vs. an outpost (which DC and AD got), since the outposts are much easier to defend and built for defense. EP is at a disadvantage. This was pointed out in PTS but ignored.

Mrsinister2 · October 2018

I ride down expecting bridge fight and there is no bridge or fight to be had

RedRook · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

Maybe it'll grow on me. I'm just glad they made some changes to the map.

Dudis · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

Overall i would say im positive to the changes, they need some tweaking though

Sandman929 · October 2018

Yes

Any time invested in making changes in Cyrodiil is welcome in my book, and in console land I haven't had a chance to try it out yet.

Elong · October 2018

Yes

Friendly fire is now an option. I'm in love.

Mayrael · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

I don't like milegates as they are unfair. One side can be blocked while the other can still pass.

arkansas_ESO · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

Three gates/bridges per "side" is too many; by the time you've destroyed all three bridges somebody's already went and repaired one. Should be lowered to two, spread far apart (ex. the bridge between Alessia and Sej and the bridge closest to the map's edge, with the second bridge in the middle beind removed) to encourage fights at the alternate paths they added in this patch.

gabriebe · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

They should have less HP and you shouldnt be able to pass them after only getting it up to 25%.

Ranger209 · October 2018

Yes

I like things that allow players to impact the environment and the flow of the game so yeah I think it is a positive. May need some tweaking to get it to where they want it to be, but it's a good start.

Vevvev · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

The milgates are good, but they also have a serious flaw. If you want to assault lets say the AD from the DC side you can repair the left and right sides. This allows your faction to scale that wall while making it impossible for the AD to do so, but all it needs is one person to troll everyone by shooting at it. Suddenly the wall cannot be repaired and it causes a whole lot of heartache for everyone on their faction.

Can we go around? Yes, but it could have been so much simpler if we could have had the sides repaired and usable.

zyk · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

I have mixed feelings. It will be interesting to see how gameplay evolves.

So far, very little has changed when one faction has an advantage over the others. They still steamroll the map with large stacks of players.

I feel that lost in the novelty of destructable milegates and bridges is that we've lost some very fun structures to fight on.

Mazbt · October 2018

Yes

In regards to the bridge, at first I thought it wouldn't be a good idea since people can run under, but they fixed that. I quite like that change. Milegate looks a lot nicer now as well.

Ackwalan · October 2018

That goat path across the river is awesome. Had a scroll run across it, and even when AD had much greater numbers, the few that stayed to block the path. Did so, and completely stopped the greater numbers from crossing long enough that the scroll was long gone.

Recremen · October 2018

I have no strong feelings about the changes. I've only played one day with it but it didn't seem like a bad change, that's for sure. I'd say neutral and leading towards good for the slightly more complex map play?

DisgracefulMind · October 2018

Yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXoyuFM-__w

ya

killahsin · October 2018

Yes

i absolutely think the changes to cyrodil are great for structured pvp.

NyassaV · October 2018

They need to put in a lot more hidden footpaths

killahsin · October 2018

Yes

i think the sides of milegates need a lot less hp if im going to add anything. The sides should be equivalent to the center in total.

Mazbt · October 2018

Yes

DisgracefulMind wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXoyuFM-__w

ya

Lol that made my day. Great situational awareness on their part too :P.

blabafat · October 2018

DisgracefulMind wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXoyuFM-__w

ya

Couldn't agree more with Karstyll

Zer0oo · October 2018

Like the idea but not the implementation

The milegates are asymmetrical while the bridges are symmetrical. All gates give always one side an advantage.(middle destroyed makes it only unpassable for one faction, you still can go up and attack the other side)

Not sure how much tactical play they offer if they can be repaired that fast or let's say i have not seen one faction forced to take the goat path.

A destroyed object is more or less a stale mate and just says move on. It does not really offer some kind of conquering it with one player sneaking past and open a portal etc.

Nermy · October 2018

Yes

Any change to the map makes it a bit more interesting for those of us who have been there since release. Changes strategies which we haven't even began to think about.

I have no problem with the outposts being closer to here or the other alliance has an advantage, it's all relative.

Anyway, whatever changes they make won't stop the guys who PvDoor every morning, just makes it more interesting for prime time.

Crixus8000 · October 2018

No

I do and don't at the same time but leaning more towards no. I always enjoyed bridge fighting and now it can still be fun when people are trying to siege the bridge, but then there is other times when it's destroyed, I get no fight and have to run a long distance to get to the otherside and that get's very tedious.

amir412 · October 2018

No

I think it is poorly implanted just to shut the community up.
If the bridge is broken, what u see is 2 factions spamming projectiles like ***,
NOW if some1 at ZOS had b****, they could easily use this situation to create 2-3 alternative routes to pass so pepole will actually need to spread, but not run the entire map again.

Gotta love the comments "any changes to cyrodill is welcome" kek.

d3adpain · November 2018

No

stupid change as if we didn't have those siege simulator players

Deep_01 · November 2018

Indifferent.

Best use of these are made only when huge groups coordinate on both sides of the battle. Not so good for solo players to contribute to the war.

Beardimus · November 2018

susmitds wrote: »

It looks good on paper, but is useless against zergs. You can repair them faster than anyone can damage it. 3 guys can repair them enough to be passable in 6 secs.

Can you repair them while they are taking damage? Or are they like doors / walls?

The Elder Scrolls Online

Do you like the changes to the bridges and milegates?

Do you like the changes to the bridges and milegates? 181 votes