Akaviri and Nords are not even remotely the same. I would love the Naga features as just normal options for Argonians. Why make them a different race? On the matter of Chimer I would say no when you have individuals like St. Veloth and Almsivi even being changed by the curse of Azura, why should some time traveler get off scot-free? Ayleids intermarried with humans and the Bosmer. You will see Ayleid ancestry among Bretons and Bosmer predominately, but to a lesser extent in Altmer and Imperial backgrounds. On the matter of Dwemer I say no. I love the Dwemer. I would love to see a TES game that actually has the Dwemer marching around doing their Dwemer-thing. All of that said I think context matters. In this game the only Dwemer we should ever even remotely have a chance of possibly seeing would be a ghost, Yagram Bagarn, or in some time travelling vision quest to the past. This race is gone for now at least and possibly forever.

I do believe that Lilmothiit, the Imga (gorilla-people of Grahtwood), the silver-skinned human savages known as the Kothringi (from Argonia) and the Maormer certainly -could- be possible options in my view but they do press a certain level of strange for the series. I could definitely accept the argument though that all the magical mounts and weird pets floating around are far stranger than a few silver humans or Gorilla people running around.

I would not pay money for this

VaranisArano wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

shaielzafine wrote: »

I would pay zero dollars. This sounds like a money grab and you missed the option for not buying anything. I purchased the Imperial edition and regret it

I have 3 imperials, they are a great addition to my character portfolio. And yes, Shaiel, this is a money making suggestion for ZOS. I didnt put a 0 option for a reason.

Because you knew the 0 option would get the most votes.

Its got my vote, for sure.

Precisely. My vote too.

I wouldn't pay anything for this.

This is why we need skooma purity laws.

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

Judas Helviaryn wrote: »

I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.

Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas

That's how you make a biased poll.

Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

Judas Helviaryn wrote: »

I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.

Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas

That's how you make a biased poll.

Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.

The thread title makes a suggestion. There's no option to reject the suggestion, which would be a perfectly valid option, and so the title is misleading and the poll biased.

This has literally become one the worst threads yet.

And yes, time travel is lazy writing, plus somebody forgot that the psijics focus around sealing time breaches amongst many other activities revolving around the old ways, to have an extinct or near extinct race arrive from a time breach or pulled from their current timeline could evidentially lead to something worse than a “Dragonbreak.” (Like tearing open a rift in the fabric of space and time and destroying the very fabric of reality to the point of eternal nothingness.)

And to those who didn’t vote, good on you. Because one thing to remember: “agree to disagree.” (that is why this poll has no meaning.)

I'd pay 10,000 Crowns to never have threads like this opened.

John_Falstaff wrote: »

I'm not sure it's a good idea. There's a tendency for paid races and classes (Imperial and Warden) to be either nerfed later (red diamond) or being left out in many departments (magicka warden DPS). Who knows, maybe ZOS is overly careful not to be accused in pay-to-win tactics.

But then again, who needs a new race when there's Welkynar motif that automatically gives +100% to awesomeness, makes every class viable and enables wearer to understand pigeon language. (And if you're not viable in latest trials, not to worry, it's available from store for just 5999.99cr. Oops, I think I gave them an idea for major development focus over next months - fractional crown values, for those wonderful Apple-like prices that make marketing people happy.)

Which is why I am not wanting new passives, just different combinations or templates of existing ones. This is purely to give MIN/MAXers other options and new flavor to the game.

This is def not any form of P2W

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

Judas Helviaryn wrote: »

I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.

Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas

That's how you make a biased poll.

Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.

Duhhh because you didn't put it as an option, that way the ONLY votes you get are people willing to pay for this crap. Biased poll.

There should be an option where people are able to vote against it or else the data you're collecting is skewed from the get-go. Pointless waste of time. Funny most comments say no anyway, despite you making this not an option in the poll. Seems your idea isn't well received thusfar.

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

Judas Helviaryn wrote: »

I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.

Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas

That's how you make a biased poll.

Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.

Duhhh because you didn't put it as an option, that way the ONLY votes you get are people willing to pay for this crap. Biased poll.

There should be an option where people are able to vote against it or else the data you're collecting is skewed from the get-go. Pointless waste of time.

Correct, this is a Crown Thread for people who buy stuff.

Right and one of the most important things when selling something is to figure out if people actually want it. By cutting out the people who wouldn't buy this one specific thing is sheer stupidity. By biasing the poll you're blatantly hiding the reality that most people don't want this.

I've probably spent more on the crown store than your average joe by a longshot, still think this idea is awful. I saw you pull this earlier in the thread too - suggesting people don't spend money - well we do - but what you're suggesting they sell is trash.

Think you have me confused with someone else, Joe

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

lagrue wrote: »

Unknown_Redemption wrote: »

Judas Helviaryn wrote: »

I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.

Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas

That's how you make a biased poll.

Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.

Duhhh because you didn't put it as an option, that way the ONLY votes you get are people willing to pay for this crap. Biased poll.

There should be an option where people are able to vote against it or else the data you're collecting is skewed from the get-go. Pointless waste of time.

Correct, this is a Crown Thread for people who buy stuff.

Right and one of the most important things when selling something is to figure out if people actually want it. By cutting out the people who wouldn't buy this one specific thing is sheer stupidity. By biasing the poll you're blatantly hiding the reality that most people don't want this.

I've probably spent more on the crown store than your average joe by a longshot, still think this idea is awful. I saw you pull this earlier in the thread too - suggesting people don't spend money - well we do - but what you're suggesting they sell is trash.

Think you have me confused with someone else, Joe

The only one confused here is you lol you have no idea how to make a poll.

You really seem to think your idea is the hottest thing on the block in years... trust me, it's not.