And the lag and poor performance ? Or is that still on the ignore list ? Selective answering ftw !

I don't really think this change is in touch with how actually sieging and keep taking works.

I mean, with 40+ people swarming around your keep and front door and pelting it with siege, you do not have 5 people, or more, to go outside your keep and take back a lumber or mine. That would also be complete and utter suicide. The minute the resource shows "under attack", a swarm of enemies will come and wipe you.

At the moment, the only use resources have is a farming spot for 2-4 elite people who take the resource and then keeps farming the scrubs that come and try and wipe them.

I get that you want to make resources "more important" and all the "keep superstructure" and all that. But hey, look at the game man. There's a long way between a keep and its 3 resources, and in a large siege, that way is going to be filled with half the server's enemy population. Keeps can be defended, you put up counter siege and get them off your ground, with good defense, it takes a long time to breach through a keep, and then you have to get through inner as well.
A resource has no defense beside the NPCs standing there, which are easily wiped. It's nearly impossible to defend, outside going turtle inside the tower and rolling along the parapet to farm scrubs, but that doesn't really matter as the flag is down on the ground.

For your plan with "superstructure" to have even a remote chance of being a success, the resources need to be a lot mroe accessible during a siege, either by moving them a lot closer to the keep, or by there being some way to teleport from a keep to a resource and back. And also, the resources would need to be much more defendable than merely having 5 NPC standing on them. Like outposts they would need walls to be breached, so it was actually feasible to defend a resource, and took longer time to flip it.

Right now I feel that you do these changes based on how you think sieging "should" be, without thinking of how it's at all feasible within the current system. The fact of the matter is that under a huge siege you simply cannot spare several handful of people going on what would most likely be a suicide mission to stand like sitting ducks on a lumber flag while it flips.
I also foresee that the extremely diminished D-ticks will also mean that people will bother less to defend keeps. That's already a problem, many times keeps have little to no defense, and cutting the D-tick down by this much just means that noone will bother going back to defend their own keeps.