
tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
Savos_Saren wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
You realize that Tweet was posted on April Fools, right?
Carbonised wrote: »Let's have the Balreth Fire Storm ability as Inferno skill, and I'll be happy
tinythinker wrote: »Savos_Saren wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
You realize that Tweet was posted on April Fools, right?
No, tinythinker is totally legit and reliable
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
tinythinker wrote: »Savos_Saren wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
You realize that Tweet was posted on April Fools, right?
No, tinythinker is totally legit and reliableI hate april fools
Savos_Saren wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »Savos_Saren wrote: »tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
You realize that Tweet was posted on April Fools, right?
No, tinythinker is totally legit and reliableI hate april fools
Yup. My little heart pitter-pattered until I realized the tweet date... then I just sank back into my chair and sobbed.
This is really a stealth "nerf nightblades" thread, isn't it.

nalimoleb14_ESO wrote: »I fell for the clickbait, and admittedly came into this thread to rage so hard.
tinythinker wrote: »How mean, especially when we already know some of what was revealed at the recent limited invitation player-meeting, hinting at good news for magDKs
