disintegr8 wrote: »As the old quote goes “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”
The options with software release are:
Software is released on time with several major bugs, some people are happy that they have something new, or something they have been waiting for. Others complain because something they have always used is suddenly broken, or the new features don't work as they should.
Software is delayed and released with some minor bugs: some people are happy because their patience was worth the wait for a 'better' product. Some will complain because they had to wait AND it is still not perfect. Others complain because the initial delivery date was not met, they completed the last DLC a week after release and have had nothing to do (or in this case they had to stop playing because they were so desperate for the storage crates and every inventory slot was maxed out).
Software is release late and with no bugs: stop dreaming and get back to reality (We are still in Kansas Toto, not Oz). One of the very first things a software tester gets taught is that you will never find all of the bugs, no matter how hard or how long you try.
I work in software development and know for a fact that the company does not like delays and the development team (especially QA) do not like releasing software with bugs. Unfortunately, there lies the issue.
Its definitely a tradition, and in pretty much every game out there: new content comes out, unexpected bugs crop up. The game company tries to fix them, but they are on a time table; if they delay launch of promised new content they're incompetent boobs who dont know how to run a game...corporate moneymen see the huge wave of negative press and suddenly people are looking for jobs. Or....they push the content out as best they can, bugs show up and they scramble to fix them post launch....they are still accused of being incompetent boobs, but people with cognitive awareness know these things happen...so no bad press and people keep their jobs.
Hmmm. Wonder which YOU'D pick? I know my answer.
The only thing thats a constant are the mass waves of entitled, impatient kids screaming that they cant get what they want, right now, no matter what.
Preach, Sister (or Brother)!
@altemriel, you can't even manage your atrocious signature, and you expect ZOS to launch a huge update without any bugs? Really?...
disintegr8 wrote: »As the old quote goes “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”
The options with software release are:
Software is released on time with several major bugs, some people are happy that they have something new, or something they have been waiting for. Others complain because something they have always used is suddenly broken, or the new features don't work as they should.
Software is delayed and released with some minor bugs: some people are happy because their patience was worth the wait for a 'better' product. Some will complain because they had to wait AND it is still not perfect. Others complain because the initial delivery date was not met, they completed the last DLC a week after release and have had nothing to do (or in this case they had to stop playing because they were so desperate for the storage crates and every inventory slot was maxed out).
Software is release late and with no bugs: stop dreaming and get back to reality (We are still in Kansas Toto, not Oz). One of the very first things a software tester gets taught is that you will never find all of the bugs, no matter how hard or how long you try.
I work in software development and know for a fact that the company does not like delays and the development team (especially QA) do not like releasing software with bugs. Unfortunately, there lies the issue.
or another option: if ZOS would just one quarter not release new content, but focus with all their devs on fixing all major bugs and release a free bug fix DLC, everyone will be happy. sure there will be some people crying why not new content, but they will understand soon ,when they start to play
then again back to schedule with releasing new dlc every quarter. if again some new bugs come up, again release a bug fix dlc, or bug fix special patch
ZOS just needs to prioritize bug fixing more, add more high-quality staff to this area and hotfix all major bugs asap!!!
Stuff happens... What is truly problematic is that these bugs have been identified before it went live and they were not fixed
disintegr8 wrote: »disintegr8 wrote: »As the old quote goes “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”
The options with software release are:
Software is released on time with several major bugs, some people are happy that they have something new, or something they have been waiting for. Others complain because something they have always used is suddenly broken, or the new features don't work as they should.
Software is delayed and released with some minor bugs: some people are happy because their patience was worth the wait for a 'better' product. Some will complain because they had to wait AND it is still not perfect. Others complain because the initial delivery date was not met, they completed the last DLC a week after release and have had nothing to do (or in this case they had to stop playing because they were so desperate for the storage crates and every inventory slot was maxed out).
Software is release late and with no bugs: stop dreaming and get back to reality (We are still in Kansas Toto, not Oz). One of the very first things a software tester gets taught is that you will never find all of the bugs, no matter how hard or how long you try.
I work in software development and know for a fact that the company does not like delays and the development team (especially QA) do not like releasing software with bugs. Unfortunately, there lies the issue.
or another option: if ZOS would just one quarter not release new content, but focus with all their devs on fixing all major bugs and release a free bug fix DLC, everyone will be happy. sure there will be some people crying why not new content, but they will understand soon ,when they start to play
then again back to schedule with releasing new dlc every quarter. if again some new bugs come up, again release a bug fix dlc, or bug fix special patch
ZOS just needs to prioritize bug fixing more, add more high-quality staff to this area and hotfix all major bugs asap!!!
Unfortunately, bug fixes don't bring in additional money, delays cost money and additional staff cost money. It takes a lot to convince a software company to accept a 'Maintenance cycle' as it hurts their bottom line.
Even if it benefits them in the long run, bean counters are looking at the current and next quarter figures, they often have trouble seeing the 'big picture'.
Seriously every update is bugland where bugs are happy as they live long and prosper
This is bad and affects the gaming experience big time.
Never saw that quantity of bugs (post beta) on any other game but that s another discussion. I would simply be happy if updates were working properly
Yes, because they've never added new content, QoL changes, fixed bugs, balanced classes for the goal of keeping ESO alive and healthy.Zbigb4life wrote: »Well with every single update they prove they care more about your money then their game
Yes, because they've never added new content, QoL changes, fixed bugs, balanced classes for the goal of keeping ESO alive and healthy.Zbigb4life wrote: »Well with every single update they prove they care more about your money then their game
If ZOS only cared about money and not providing a good game it would look very different. There are plenty of these kinds of games out there, ESO for all its flaws and Crown Store shenanigans is not one of them.
Major bugs yes and most often they are. However to each individual every bug is "major".yes, true, it is for sure not, that they would not care about the quality of their game. but bug fixes should be more fast! at least for the major bugsYes, because they've never added new content, QoL changes, fixed bugs, balanced classes for the goal of keeping ESO alive and healthy.Zbigb4life wrote: »Well with every single update they prove they care more about your money then their game
If ZOS only cared about money and not providing a good game it would look very different. There are plenty of these kinds of games out there, ESO for all its flaws and Crown Store shenanigans is not one of them.
Yes, because they've never added new content, QoL changes, fixed bugs, balanced classes for the goal of keeping ESO alive and healthy.Zbigb4life wrote: »Well with every single update they prove they care more about your money then their game
If ZOS only cared about money and not providing a good game it would look very different. There are plenty of these kinds of games out there, ESO for all its flaws and Crown Store shenanigans is not one of them.
yes, true, it is for sure not, that they would not care about the quality of their game. but bug fixes should be more fast! at least for the major bugs
- Update 23Ice Furnace: This item set now grants Spell Damage, rather than Weapon Damage for the 4 piece bonus
Can we also fix some very old and probably most annoying bugs: lightning staff bugs and invisible group members
At this point it should be quite embarrassing that these bugs are still around.
JackDaniell wrote: »ESO's longstanding reputation as a very laggy and buggy game is probably the singular biggest obstacle that holds this game back. Zenimax does not seem interested in producing game that works properly.
People used to say never play on patch week.
Ok ok, I made that up.
JackDaniell wrote: »ESO's longstanding reputation as a very laggy and buggy game is probably the singular biggest obstacle that holds this game back. Zenimax does not seem interested in producing game that works properly.
OR (!) you could say they are consistent.
People used to say never play on patch week.
Ok ok, I made that up.