@ZOS Devs, Please Share the Player Feedback Document

GrumpyDuckling · January 2018

On last night's ESO Live, you briefly mentioned that there is a document of player feedback that you compiled from the forums. The document is a list of intended changes that continuously gets pushed from current patch to next patch, if not implemented. Can you please share that document/list on the forum so that players get an idea about upcoming changes that you're intending to make based on our feedback?

For anyone who wants to see the exact segment I'm referencing, it's from 47:21 to 47:59 on the 4/19/18 ESO Live.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDbzTZDflC8&has_verified=1

Greevir · January 2018

Official Document of Upcoming Changes Based on Player Feedback:

Issues:

1. Cyrodiil Lag is unbearable.
2. Nerf Argonians
3. Nerf Sorcs
4. Nerf Rocks
5. Fix Templar Jesus Beam
6. Break Miat's Addon

Solutions:

1. Respond to these issues on the forums with our standard Copy/Paste responses.
2. Add new Motif to Crown Store
3. Laugh all the way to the bank.

Ragnarock41 · January 2018

I don't have patience or blind trust to wait another 6 months for ZOS to fix my broken , unplayable class.
So seriously, if they have any plans, they better talk about it now, and not 3 months later.

f047ys3v3n · January 2018

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

Also, is fire Wrobel on that document? I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

GrumpyDuckling · January 2018

f047ys3v3n wrote: »

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

Also, is fire Wrobel on that document? I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

@f047ys3v3n

The last part of your post isn't necessary. Please edit your post to remove that last part.

Jjitsuboy98 · January 2018

GrumpyDuckling wrote: »

f047ys3v3n wrote: »

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

Also, is fire Wrobel on that document? I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

@f047ys3v3n

The last part of your post isn't necessary. Please edit your post to remove that last part.

I feel like it's very necessary. They should be held accountable for the garbage that is Cyrodil.

Wrubius_Coronaria · January 2018

Jjitsuboy98 wrote: »

GrumpyDuckling wrote: »

f047ys3v3n wrote: »

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

Also, is fire Wrobel on that document? I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

@f047ys3v3n

The last part of your post isn't necessary. Please edit your post to remove that last part.

I feel like it's very necessary. They should be held accountable for the garbage that is Cyrodil.

I really don't understand all this hate towards Wrobel.

He's not responsible of cyrodiil. And it's more easy to blame one person than something unclear like Zernimax as compagny in general. (decisions wich you disagree does not mean they're bad)
For his defense he's also not responsible for all bugs and problems that we have in game.

Pinja · January 2018

Jjitsuboy98 wrote: »

GrumpyDuckling wrote: »

f047ys3v3n wrote: »

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

[snip] I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

@f047ys3v3n

The last part of your post isn't necessary. Please edit your post to remove that last part.

I feel like it's very necessary. They should be held accountable for the garbage that is Cyrodil.

As a critic & pvp'r I say things could be worse the games really dynamic & due to a limited opinion & test base most of the balance 'tests' happen on the live.
If you see the slight details he's working with...
Any major issues? -Yes Cyrodiil lag.
Is that a balance issue? -Yes, Please nerf the lag.

Out side the one opinion that I have on a certain class played toward magica things seem well rounded. Hopefully the skill advisor will help the rest..

GrumpyDuckling · January 2018

Bringing the request back up. Thanks, ZOS.

charley222 · January 2018

Caitsith wrote: »

Jjitsuboy98 wrote: »

GrumpyDuckling wrote: »

f047ys3v3n wrote: »

This one remembers the mention of the player feedback / roadmap to change document. This one would like to see it as well. Then I could make a more informed decision about if I should quit today, resub in anticipation of a positive direction, or go ahead and download cheat engine because doing something about it is not on the list at all and I would like to be back on a level playing field.

Also, is fire Wrobel on that document? I feel like we should maybe front bar that.

@f047ys3v3n

The last part of your post isn't necessary. Please edit your post to remove that last part.

I feel like it's very necessary. They should be held accountable for the garbage that is Cyrodil.

I really don't understand all this hate towards Wrobel.

He's not responsible of cyrodiil. And it's more easy to blame one person than something unclear like Zernimax as compagny in general. (decisions wich you disagree does not mean they're bad)
For his defense he's also not responsible for all bugs and problems that we have in game.

i guess your not around from a longtime old player will understand quick and be agree google reddit youtube you will understand quick

GrumpyDuckling · February 2018

Asking again for the document to be shared.

aeowulf · February 2018

We won't see the document, and it could literally change on an hour by hour basis so might be inaccurate by the time it's uploaded.

I would like to know the top say 5 or 10 things. Right now the most important thing to me is PvE role balance between the classes, NB tank especially, but also DK healer and basically anything else that is under-represented in ESO. I can only go from what i see in group finder and forum posts, but ZoS will be able to see those stats, like has a DK healer completed vCoA2 recently, or have NB tanks really completely gone or is it just my imagination?

GrumpyDuckling · February 2018

aeowulf wrote: »

We won't see the document, and it could literally change on an hour by hour basis so might be inaccurate by the time it's uploaded.

I would like to know the top say 5 or 10 things. Right now the most important thing to me is class balance, NB tank especially, but also DK healer and basically anything else that is under-represented in ESO. I can only go from what i see in group finder and forum posts, but ZoZ will be able to see those stats, like has a DK healer completed vCoA2 recently, or have NB tanks really completely gone or is it just my imagination?

At the very least, it would be a start if they uploaded "high priority" feedback. Feedback that they deem likely to insight change in the future.

Shanjijri · February 2018

aeowulf wrote: »

have NB tanks really completely gone or is it just my imagination?

I haven't seen one for a long time now...

VaranisArano · February 2018

Nerf ALL the things.
Buff ALL the things.
Fix the lag.

idk · February 2018

Essentially Zos does share what they're working on in the short run. They started last quarter with monthly undated but now are doing it quarterly since it's work that will tie in with the quarterly updates.

Zos does look at what we say. Ofc not all ideas will be implemented. Some would. It be easy even when someone says it would be. Others just don't fit why the vision Zos has. Most they are working on would find someone to complain about it just because the forums is filled with complaints.

I'm actually surprised Zos would actually mention such a document even though it should be obvious they'd have something. Merely be because it would open thing up to asking for them even though it's something I'd expect they would not share.

GrumpyDuckling · April 2018

Before the release of Summerset, I'll ask again for you to please share the document.