Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
An AAA game (usually pronounced "triple A game") is an informal classification used for video games with the highest development budgets and levels of promotion.
Which ESO has. Just because it's not perfect and has bugs and issues doesn't mean it's not a AAA game. Pretty much every single AAA game on the market is buggy, cash grabs these days, doesn't make them less AAA.
I never said he can't feel cheated, I just pointed out that no matter how cheated one feels you don't get to change the classification of AAA game.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
An AAA game (usually pronounced "triple A game") is an informal classification used for video games with the highest development budgets and levels of promotion.
Which ESO has. Just because it's not perfect and has bugs and issues doesn't mean it's not a AAA game. Pretty much every single AAA game on the market is buggy, cash grabs these days, doesn't make them less AAA.
Your fandom is overwhelming ... He says he "feels" cheated . These are all his feelings . Some will agree that in no way was he actually cheated by the developer and is just experiencing the usual MMO roller coaster ride of change .
Who comes up with this AAA rating system anyways ? I would like to register a complaint when I bought Age of Wushu a few years ago .
I never said he can't feel cheated, I just pointed out that no matter how cheated one feels you don't get to change the classification of AAA game.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
An AAA game (usually pronounced "triple A game") is an informal classification used for video games with the highest development budgets and levels of promotion.
Which ESO has. Just because it's not perfect and has bugs and issues doesn't mean it's not a AAA game. Pretty much every single AAA game on the market is buggy, cash grabs these days, doesn't make them less AAA.
Your fandom is overwhelming ... He says he "feels" cheated . These are all his feelings . Some will agree that in no way was he actually cheated by the developer and is just experiencing the usual MMO roller coaster ride of change .
Who comes up with this AAA rating system anyways ? I would like to register a complaint when I bought Age of Wushu a few years ago .
As for where it came from the wiki article said "The term "AAA" began to be used in the late 1990s, with some development companies started using the expression at gaming conventions in the US." so I guess they started using it and everyone kept it going?
In this day and age it would probably work as well. Any way... off topic.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Another faceless entity in the gaming industry throwing wonton alphabet letters around the interwebz to describe their product with no quality control . I will start telling the locals my tacos are Triple A tacos then .
Alexandrious wrote: »Multiple factors. Alot of ppl dont like animatiin canceling specially since latest nerfs to it made it harder to use according to all I read, still seems fine to me. Difficulty in purchasing items since new gen majority is used to auction houses, also the fact that the whole trade system became cut throat, you can read on that in some posts.
Nightblades being nerfed constantly, to the point that they are screaming for class change tokens. Which zenimax will provide.... for up to 5k crowns each, then wait a few months, then buff nightblades bk up so all the ones that used the token will buy another to change back, standard mmo business practice, seen it before, it will happen.
Then their is the fact Bethesda stated their will not be anoter elder scrolls or even a fallout game for a long while, so you get all these kids who want online skyrim clamoring to eso, finds out its very much different, has a vad time in any number of ways, quits, puts up a bad review.
Damn typing on a phine is a ***. I need a note 8. Anyway, lots of reasons, oh and bad optimization too. You could have a beast of a rig with a g sync monitor, your frames will be sporadic and even go below 60 unless you manually tweak the settings.
Will give props though, eso plus giving a craft bag and double bank space is a winner for me. Im always big on inventory space since im a pack rat and hate having to organize every 30 mins. But yea, take what I say what you will. But if ya search reddit and the forums you will find the truth to all I said.
Night blades are still very good they are just no ez mode anymore because procs were nerfed
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »I never said he can't feel cheated, I just pointed out that no matter how cheated one feels you don't get to change the classification of AAA game.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
An AAA game (usually pronounced "triple A game") is an informal classification used for video games with the highest development budgets and levels of promotion.
Which ESO has. Just because it's not perfect and has bugs and issues doesn't mean it's not a AAA game. Pretty much every single AAA game on the market is buggy, cash grabs these days, doesn't make them less AAA.
Your fandom is overwhelming ... He says he "feels" cheated . These are all his feelings . Some will agree that in no way was he actually cheated by the developer and is just experiencing the usual MMO roller coaster ride of change .
Who comes up with this AAA rating system anyways ? I would like to register a complaint when I bought Age of Wushu a few years ago .
As for where it came from the wiki article said "The term "AAA" began to be used in the late 1990s, with some development companies started using the expression at gaming conventions in the US." so I guess they started using it and everyone kept it going?
Another faceless entity in the gaming industry throwing wonton alphabet letters around the interwebz to describe their product with no quality control . I will start telling the locals my tacos are Triple A tacos then .
Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »I never said he can't feel cheated, I just pointed out that no matter how cheated one feels you don't get to change the classification of AAA game.Rohamad_Ali wrote: »It is a AAA game though.Kneighbors wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Nyghthowler wrote: »@Kneighbors , here's an idea; try playing the game and decide for yourself if it's good or not.
If you don't like it, then try whining and crying to Steam for a refund. You never know...
But make your own decision; don't get led around by your nose.
Don't get led around by your nose ? Is that a real expression ? Because your nose can warn you before you step in *** .
Also ignoring a problem does not address a problem . The OP posted to identify possible issues . Knowledge that could help ZoS if they decided to use it possibly . Telling people to whine and ask for refunds adds nothing to the conversation .
Yes, that's a real expression.
Ignoring what problem? Steam metrics is one of the worst places for an informed opinion.
I wasn't really trying to add to the conversation because the OP started out with a whiney tone, stating they feel cheated. The game has been out long enough for him, her, or they to do research on it and determine if they wanted to play it. I have no sympathy for these types of posters.
I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago. I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
As many players today I like hardcore gaming. It felt really fast paced at the state it was one year ago. Changing to sustain slowed down the hell out of the game and deteriorating performance became a dragging anchor. The game today feels like an old cell phone overloaded with junk apps, filled with performance glitches, many features not working anymore and while you hate you still continue using it. Now I can't blame manufacturer of the cellphone for that because they are not positioning it as AAA phone by that time while ESO is still trying to sell itself as an AAA game. Well its not. And that's why I feel cheated.
An AAA game (usually pronounced "triple A game") is an informal classification used for video games with the highest development budgets and levels of promotion.
Which ESO has. Just because it's not perfect and has bugs and issues doesn't mean it's not a AAA game. Pretty much every single AAA game on the market is buggy, cash grabs these days, doesn't make them less AAA.
Your fandom is overwhelming ... He says he "feels" cheated . These are all his feelings . Some will agree that in no way was he actually cheated by the developer and is just experiencing the usual MMO roller coaster ride of change .
Who comes up with this AAA rating system anyways ? I would like to register a complaint when I bought Age of Wushu a few years ago .
As for where it came from the wiki article said "The term "AAA" began to be used in the late 1990s, with some development companies started using the expression at gaming conventions in the US." so I guess they started using it and everyone kept it going?
Another faceless entity in the gaming industry throwing wonton alphabet letters around the interwebz to describe their product with no quality control . I will start telling the locals my tacos are Triple A tacos then .
Usually I agree with your posts, but now I fee you're being argumentative just to be so.
The fact that the OP bought the game a F'ing YEAR ago and now feels cheated because the rankings have dropped is ridiculous!
I seriously hope this post gets closed, because the OP is .... words that will get me banned.
lordrichter wrote: »The game gets worse and worse and worse because it is overseen by ZOS, which is objectovely a poorly run, unprofessional, short-sighted company.
Meh. No. Evidence to the contrary, and all that. We would not be here today if this were the case.
I can't speak for the numbers from Steam, but Chapters are likely to lead to a steady decline for most of the year. I expect to see ramped up interest in the couple months ahead of the Chapter, and the month after it. Of course, depending on the Chapter and how much it costs.
I don't think that Morrowind was a runaway success, simply because the Chapter cannot live up to the game. That, coupled with a perception of high price with low content, means that they have an entire year with nothing to really grab new players and hold attention. Piddly stuff like Clockwork City will interest existing players, but new players have no idea what to think of it. That will likely be the story for the 1Q DLC, too. They have to put the good stuff into the Chapters, and that means three quarters of "yawn". Less content and more people noticing lag and bugs that never get fixed.
I fear that they will compensate with a bunch of marketing related crap. No compelling content, just marketing tricks to bring in revenue. Hardly things that boost ratings.
In my mind, everything rests next on the 2Q 2018 Chapter. What it is. How sexy it sounds. Bang for the buck.
lordrichter wrote: »The game gets worse and worse and worse because it is overseen by ZOS, which is objectovely a poorly run, unprofessional, short-sighted company.
Meh. No. Evidence to the contrary, and all that. We would not be here today if this were the case.
I can't speak for the numbers from Steam, but Chapters are likely to lead to a steady decline for most of the year. I expect to see ramped up interest in the couple months ahead of the Chapter, and the month after it. Of course, depending on the Chapter and how much it costs.
I don't think that Morrowind was a runaway success, simply because the Chapter cannot live up to the game. That, coupled with a perception of high price with low content, means that they have an entire year with nothing to really grab new players and hold attention. Piddly stuff like Clockwork City will interest existing players, but new players have no idea what to think of it. That will likely be the story for the 1Q DLC, too. They have to put the good stuff into the Chapters, and that means three quarters of "yawn". Less content and more people noticing lag and bugs that never get fixed.
I fear that they will compensate with a bunch of marketing related crap. No compelling content, just marketing tricks to bring in revenue. Hardly things that boost ratings.
In my mind, everything rests next on the 2Q 2018 Chapter. What it is. How sexy it sounds. Bang for the buck.
Kneighbors wrote: »
The overall rating is 79% positive while the latest 1k reviews are only 66% positive. Honestly, I feel cheated. When I purchased the game it was written OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE out there and the rating was above 85% positive. This was the primary reason I purchased the game.
When I was 16 y/o I had enough time to check any mediocre game out there. Nowadays when I'm slightly older I'm looking only at the best of the best, picking the strawberries outta pie. No chance I would buy a game with MIXED reviews on steam. Open the reviews, make a fast scroll and it will become apparent this is not the game you want to spend your only 2 hours free a day, making good times roll. Of course if you are not a truly devoted fanboy.
So why is it happening? Do you think it's just the game aging and it's a natural process? Do you believe the rating will go up in the future?
Wifeaggro13 wrote: »Kneighbors wrote: »
The overall rating is 79% positive while the latest 1k reviews are only 66% positive. Honestly, I feel cheated. When I purchased the game it was written OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE out there and the rating was above 85% positive. This was the primary reason I purchased the game.
When I was 16 y/o I had enough time to check any mediocre game out there. Nowadays when I'm slightly older I'm looking only at the best of the best, picking the strawberries outta pie. No chance I would buy a game with MIXED reviews on steam. Open the reviews, make a fast scroll and it will become apparent this is not the game you want to spend your only 2 hours free a day, making good times roll. Of course if you are not a truly devoted fanboy.
So why is it happening? Do you think it's just the game aging and it's a natural process? Do you believe the rating will go up in the future?
Its the vision and game direction. It was a great game 18 months ago. The firing of key people and pushing matts one dimmensional game was not wise.
Kneighbors wrote: »[I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago.
MilwaukeeScott wrote: »Kneighbors wrote: »[I feel cheated because it's a different game from the game that I bought one year ago.
I usually don't play a game for a whole year. It gets old.
I've been playing ESO now for 3 years.
I'm sorry ESO is no longer what you want it to be.
Can I have your stuff?
AbysmalGhul wrote: »Obviously you've never been truly cheated if ratings on a game make you feel cheated.
Kneighbors wrote: »I feel cheated because today I wouldn't buy it by just looking at the rating (and yea Steam rating seems reliable to me).
AbysmalGhul wrote: »Obviously you've never been truly cheated if ratings on a game make you feel cheated.