Speaking about mNB being bad, yet 9/10 emperors are mNB...
Speaking about mNB being bad, yet 9/10 emperors are mNB...
Stam DKs are underperforming as DPS's, but they still make the best tanks in the game.. just got to spec them to their strengths.Stam NBs dont bring much to a group, but they are more solo style anyway...
FloppyTouch wrote: »Magic NB or the weakest imo bombers are a one trick pony but an open world none bomber build is very weak.
Stamplars I would say are not far behind
Then I would say mdk after them in open world
FloppyTouch wrote: »Magic NB or the weakest imo bombers are a one trick pony but an open world none bomber build is very weak.
Stamplars I would say are not far behind
Then I would say mdk after them in open world
I disagree. A moderately skilled MagBlade is a major threat to have as an opponent in Cyrodiil. And if you are up against a highly skilled MagBlade, then you have nothing more dangerous to on your hands to deal with. As much as I find MagSorcs and MagPlars to be nuisances and incredibly frustrating to deal with, they don't come close to the threat level of a MagBlade. And no, I'm not talking about bomber MagBlades. Although those are dangerous in their own way too. Those of you who find MagBlades weak that aren't bombers, must not have fought MagBlades who know what they are doing. Even the best of MagPlars and MagSorcs can get blasted and feasted on by a skilled MagBlade. I've seen it personally. I've witnessed a single MagBlade rip apart a group like nothing, without having to rely on bomb cheese builds.
FloppyTouch wrote: »Magic NB or the weakest imo bombers are a one trick pony but an open world none bomber build is very weak.
Stamplars I would say are not far behind
Then I would say mdk after them in open world
I disagree. A moderately skilled MagBlade is a major threat to have as an opponent in Cyrodiil. And if you are up against a highly skilled MagBlade, then you have nothing more dangerous to on your hands to deal with. As much as I find MagSorcs and MagPlars to be nuisances and incredibly frustrating to deal with, they don't come close to the threat level of a MagBlade. And no, I'm not talking about bomber MagBlades. Although those are dangerous in their own way too. Those of you who find MagBlades weak that aren't bombers, must not have fought MagBlades who know what they are doing. Even the best of MagPlars and MagSorcs can get blasted and feasted on by a skilled MagBlade. I've seen it personally. I've witnessed a single MagBlade rip apart a group like nothing, without having to rely on bomb cheese builds.
It sounds like you've mostly fought the ones in heavy armor?
FloppyTouch wrote: »Magic NB or the weakest imo bombers are a one trick pony but an open world none bomber build is very weak.
Stamplars I would say are not far behind
Then I would say mdk after them in open world
I disagree. A moderately skilled MagBlade is a major threat to have as an opponent in Cyrodiil. And if you are up against a highly skilled MagBlade, then you have nothing more dangerous to on your hands to deal with. As much as I find MagSorcs and MagPlars to be nuisances and incredibly frustrating to deal with, they don't come close to the threat level of a MagBlade. And no, I'm not talking about bomber MagBlades. Although those are dangerous in their own way too. Those of you who find MagBlades weak that aren't bombers, must not have fought MagBlades who know what they are doing. Even the best of MagPlars and MagSorcs can get blasted and feasted on by a skilled MagBlade. I've seen it personally. I've witnessed a single MagBlade rip apart a group like nothing, without having to rely on bomb cheese builds.
It sounds like you've mostly fought the ones in heavy armor?
I don't know their setups, and if I said I knew their builds — I'd be lying. All I know is that these people were incredibly dangerous. People tend to forget that MagBlades are essentially MagSorcs, without the shield spamming and mines and strong pets to abuse. But what do they have in place of it...? Stealth, better mobility, higher burst, stronger self-buffs, and the best CC abilities the game has to offer. All of which are coming together to create a very potent mixture of whoop-ass. Lol.
Matter of a fact, a perfect example. Just yesterday I was going from Sejanus to BRK, and watched what I think was a DC MagBlade pick apart a zerg that was chasing him. I was watching from up top of the outpost (lol I was cheesing with that oil, as there was a previous engagement there of a zerg attacking the outpost), and the MagBlade was just slaying them. And this was no noob zerg either. I'm talking tribunes and above. And that MagBlade was going ham on them. Merked every last 1 of them, and took off. I was just watching like, "Damn... That boy just did work."
FloppyTouch wrote: »Magic NB or the weakest imo bombers are a one trick pony but an open world none bomber build is very weak.
Stamplars I would say are not far behind
Then I would say mdk after them in open world
I disagree. A moderately skilled MagBlade is a major threat to have as an opponent in Cyrodiil. And if you are up against a highly skilled MagBlade, then you have nothing more dangerous to on your hands to deal with. As much as I find MagSorcs and MagPlars to be nuisances and incredibly frustrating to deal with, they don't come close to the threat level of a MagBlade. And no, I'm not talking about bomber MagBlades. Although those are dangerous in their own way too. Those of you who find MagBlades weak that aren't bombers, must not have fought MagBlades who know what they are doing. Even the best of MagPlars and MagSorcs can get blasted and feasted on by a skilled MagBlade. I've seen it personally. I've witnessed a single MagBlade rip apart a group like nothing, without having to rely on bomb cheese builds.
It sounds like you've mostly fought the ones in heavy armor?
I don't know their setups, and if I said I knew their builds — I'd be lying. All I know is that these people were incredibly dangerous. People tend to forget that MagBlades are essentially MagSorcs, without the shield spamming and mines and strong pets to abuse. But what do they have in place of it...? Stealth, better mobility, higher burst, stronger self-buffs, and the best CC abilities the game has to offer. All of which are coming together to create a very potent mixture of whoop-ass. Lol.
Matter of a fact, a perfect example. Just yesterday I was going from Sejanus to BRK, and watched what I think was a DC MagBlade pick apart a zerg that was chasing him. I was watching from up top of the outpost (lol I was cheesing with that oil, as there was a previous engagement there of a zerg attacking the outpost), and the MagBlade was just slaying them. And this was no noob zerg either. I'm talking tribunes and above. And that MagBlade was going ham on them. Merked every last 1 of them, and took off. I was just watching like, "Damn... That boy just did work."
Sounds like KenaPK. Was it on PC/NA?
In my opinion, the stam sorc and magicka nightblade under preform. This is merely in your experience, while there are no wrong answers if you say magic sorc then you're a dip. Please provide some reasoning for these as well.
Stam sorc; it has like no class abilties, it's mostly just weapon skills
nightmage; They get messed to easily, and in comparison to stamblade there is little competition
Ceridwynne wrote: »Me!! I am terrible at pvp no matter what class I am playing.
Cherryblossom wrote: »In my opinion, the stam sorc and magicka nightblade under preform. This is merely in your experience, while there are no wrong answers if you say magic sorc then you're a dip. Please provide some reasoning for these as well.
Stam sorc; it has like no class abilties, it's mostly just weapon skills
nightmage; They get messed to easily, and in comparison to stamblade there is little competition
It's almost like you don't even play the game!
Just because you can't play the class, doesn't mean that others don't excel with the class. My Stam Sorc is awesome in PVP and I've been killed by lots of Mag NB
Non-healbot/solo magicka templars in bad spot. Worst damage output from all classes, worst CC capability from all classes, worse sustain from all classes. <-- Those definetly not worthy of being best support class.
Speaking about mNB being bad, yet 9/10 emperors are mNB...
@Enslaved Isn't it funny how that works? Yet we will see thread after thread of people begging for Nightblade buffs, and swearing out how "squishy" and weak they are. You will see people making claims of how "skillful" Nightblades as a class are, and how it takes all this dedication to be proficient with them. Meanwhile, a complete beginner can pick-up a NB (mag or stamina), and unleash havoc. And don't let an "Anti-NB Thread" appear. Oh no. They will swarm and derail the thread like nothing you've seen before. It's ridiculous, to be honest.
Wreuntzylla wrote: »Stam sorc underperforms?
let me just clarify, stam sorc as a class under preforms. They are powerful because of weapon skills, Hurricane does very little damage
Olen_Mikko wrote: »NBs might seem weak, but in the right hands (yes, you really REALLY R E A L L Y need to l2p this class) they're really strong.