LiquidPony wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I bought a 1 Wild Hunt crate last week and a 4-pack of Dwarven Crates yesterday.
I got a Wild Hunt Horse and a Dwarven Bear mount. Makes up for my awful RNG in-game I guess (not really).
Am I a bad person?
Do not take the complaints regarding the system as a personal attack against the fans who enable its existence; we have all been there in our lives, thinking all is fine and letting the companies push the line a little further as time went by. We are the boiling frogs.
I say "we" because I am aware that I also did support sleazy practices even if I don't buy crates. When I bought a DLC with a different name just because I wanted an ice mage so badly, I also enabled a sleazy practice.
We have all been enablers or this wouldn't be happening to us. We're all in this together whether we like it or not.
Exactly. And not just in ESO. The gaming community as a whole has always been extremely forgiven and forgetful. That's how we got here, for better and for worse.
I just fundamentally disagree with all of this, I guess.
It's hard to beat the bang for the buck we get out of video games.
I have 3000+ hours in ESO. I've spent maybe $600-700 on the game (PC, XB1, subscription, crowns) over several years.
So maybe some might consider me an "enabler" for having that attitude but it is what it is. I don't mind Crown Crates, I don't mind the Crown Store, I don't mind that there are now items that are only available from RNG purchases. I don't begrudge the ZOS folks for trying to make a good living off of this game. The only line in the sand I draw is P2W (in the way that I define it, being things that give you an actual competitive advantage in the game), and we haven't come near that yet IMO.
Contrary to the quote above, I actually think that gamers often have a pretty entitled attitude and get more than fair value for their money. Back in the 90s, we paid $50-60 for games that a handful of guys built in a few months (IIRC, mega-titles like Super Mario Bros. and Sonic the Hedgehog were developed in under a year by teams of 5-8 developers/artists/designers). Today we pay $50-$60 for games that teams of dozens or hundreds of people spend years and tens of millions of dollars creating and then spend years and millions more dollars maintaining infrastructure so that we can play online.
I get the impression that there's a lot of romanticism for the "good old days" of gaming, but I think it's nonsense.
LiquidPony wrote: »I get the impression that there's a lot of romanticism for the "good old days" of gaming, but I think it's nonsense.
Somtimes, when I see posts like this, I am convinced that I read the forums way too much.
The tone that some people take in their posts is unbelievable.
I don't know if it's a moral high ground or if some people just can't resist spending their rent money on game shinies.
Its a game.
A game that is a product for sale in a free enterprise system.
The owner of the products sells it how they like and at what price they like.
Their business model is set up to optimize profit.
If people like the product and price, they are successful.
ESO is succesful.
No succesful business model will ever cater to an individual.
It is not their job to make you happy. It is your job to make you happy.
If you don't like Crown Crates, don't buy them.
If you think there's not enough benefit to ESO+, don't sub.
If you think that there's no value in Housing, don't invest your time.
If you think that overall the game is unfair, stop playing.
Life is unfair, and nobody owes you anything.
BlackSparrow wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I bought a 1 Wild Hunt crate last week and a 4-pack of Dwarven Crates yesterday.
I got a Wild Hunt Horse and a Dwarven Bear mount. Makes up for my awful RNG in-game I guess (not really).
Am I a bad person?
Do not take the complaints regarding the system as a personal attack against the fans who enable its existence; we have all been there in our lives, thinking all is fine and letting the companies push the line a little further as time went by. We are the boiling frogs.
I say "we" because I am aware that I also did support sleazy practices even if I don't buy crates. When I bought a DLC with a different name just because I wanted an ice mage so badly, I also enabled a sleazy practice.
We have all been enablers or this wouldn't be happening to us. We're all in this together whether we like it or not.
Exactly. And not just in ESO. The gaming community as a whole has always been extremely forgiven and forgetful. That's how we got here, for better and for worse.
I just fundamentally disagree with all of this, I guess.
It's hard to beat the bang for the buck we get out of video games.
I have 3000+ hours in ESO. I've spent maybe $600-700 on the game (PC, XB1, subscription, crowns) over several years.
So maybe some might consider me an "enabler" for having that attitude but it is what it is. I don't mind Crown Crates, I don't mind the Crown Store, I don't mind that there are now items that are only available from RNG purchases. I don't begrudge the ZOS folks for trying to make a good living off of this game. The only line in the sand I draw is P2W (in the way that I define it, being things that give you an actual competitive advantage in the game), and we haven't come near that yet IMO.
Contrary to the quote above, I actually think that gamers often have a pretty entitled attitude and get more than fair value for their money. Back in the 90s, we paid $50-60 for games that a handful of guys built in a few months (IIRC, mega-titles like Super Mario Bros. and Sonic the Hedgehog were developed in under a year by teams of 5-8 developers/artists/designers). Today we pay $50-$60 for games that teams of dozens or hundreds of people spend years and tens of millions of dollars creating and then spend years and millions more dollars maintaining infrastructure so that we can play online.
I get the impression that there's a lot of romanticism for the "good old days" of gaming, but I think it's nonsense.
I agree with you about paying an equivalent price for the entertainment we get. That's why I don't mind paying for sub, Morrowind, or any of the other ridiculous little cosmetic items I've gotten over the years (including Tel Galen). I'll pay for my entertainment, because I can afford it, and it keeps the game running. I will never apologize for paying for content, because I've weighed the cost of the content against the enjoyment I expect to get out of it as part of the purchase process. And given that I know what I like in a game like this, I am rarely disappointed with what I do buy. Even Crown Crates, I understood, though I was leery because I've seen other games go to Oblivion in a handbasket after gamble boxes were introduced.
But I draw the line at gamble box items that do not let you directly purchase them in some manner. Those, you don't know the cost, and that is a dangerous prospect to anyone who isn't good at managing their money. They can set out to try for an apex mount, and before they know it they've bought $300 worth of crates one Crown pack at a time. I don't even consider getting these items an option, because I cannot weigh the entertainment vs cost ratio against something that has no fixed cost.
That's my breaking point, and I suppose it's my fault that I did not expect ZOS to cross a line I'd set in my mind as the limit between acceptable business practices and predatory sales techniques. Apparently, when it comes to paying for gaming content, the line between what's acceptable and what's predatory is more subjective than most of us realize.
BlackSparrow wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »I bought a 1 Wild Hunt crate last week and a 4-pack of Dwarven Crates yesterday.
I got a Wild Hunt Horse and a Dwarven Bear mount. Makes up for my awful RNG in-game I guess (not really).
Am I a bad person?
Do not take the complaints regarding the system as a personal attack against the fans who enable its existence; we have all been there in our lives, thinking all is fine and letting the companies push the line a little further as time went by. We are the boiling frogs.
I say "we" because I am aware that I also did support sleazy practices even if I don't buy crates. When I bought a DLC with a different name just because I wanted an ice mage so badly, I also enabled a sleazy practice.
We have all been enablers or this wouldn't be happening to us. We're all in this together whether we like it or not.
Exactly. And not just in ESO. The gaming community as a whole has always been extremely forgiven and forgetful. That's how we got here, for better and for worse.
I just fundamentally disagree with all of this, I guess.
It's hard to beat the bang for the buck we get out of video games.
I have 3000+ hours in ESO. I've spent maybe $600-700 on the game (PC, XB1, subscription, crowns) over several years.
So maybe some might consider me an "enabler" for having that attitude but it is what it is. I don't mind Crown Crates, I don't mind the Crown Store, I don't mind that there are now items that are only available from RNG purchases. I don't begrudge the ZOS folks for trying to make a good living off of this game. The only line in the sand I draw is P2W (in the way that I define it, being things that give you an actual competitive advantage in the game), and we haven't come near that yet IMO.
Contrary to the quote above, I actually think that gamers often have a pretty entitled attitude and get more than fair value for their money. Back in the 90s, we paid $50-60 for games that a handful of guys built in a few months (IIRC, mega-titles like Super Mario Bros. and Sonic the Hedgehog were developed in under a year by teams of 5-8 developers/artists/designers). Today we pay $50-$60 for games that teams of dozens or hundreds of people spend years and tens of millions of dollars creating and then spend years and millions more dollars maintaining infrastructure so that we can play online.
I get the impression that there's a lot of romanticism for the "good old days" of gaming, but I think it's nonsense.
I agree with you about paying an equivalent price for the entertainment we get. That's why I don't mind paying for sub, Morrowind, or any of the other ridiculous little cosmetic items I've gotten over the years (including Tel Galen). I'll pay for my entertainment, because I can afford it, and it keeps the game running. I will never apologize for paying for content, because I've weighed the cost of the content against the enjoyment I expect to get out of it as part of the purchase process. And given that I know what I like in a game like this, I am rarely disappointed with what I do buy. Even Crown Crates, I understood, though I was leery because I've seen other games go to Oblivion in a handbasket after gamble boxes were introduced.
But I draw the line at gamble box items that do not let you directly purchase them in some manner. Those, you don't know the cost, and that is a dangerous prospect to anyone who isn't good at managing their money. They can set out to try for an apex mount, and before they know it they've bought $300 worth of crates one Crown pack at a time. I don't even consider getting these items an option, because I cannot weigh the entertainment vs cost ratio against something that has no fixed cost.
That's my breaking point, and I suppose it's my fault that I did not expect ZOS to cross a line I'd set in my mind as the limit between acceptable business practices and predatory sales techniques. Apparently, when it comes to paying for gaming content, the line between what's acceptable and what's predatory is more subjective than most of us realize.
Malamar1229 wrote: »this is an attitude that gets businesses shut down. Yes it is their job to make you happy.
in the end, this is kind of slimey. its like going to a restaurant and having them charge you for utensils.
CardboardedBox wrote: »Full motifs being in there really bothered me...
LadyDestiny wrote: »I fou d these right off the bat. Wasn't difficult.
lordrichter wrote: »Their job is not to make people happy.
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Their job is not to make people happy.
I'm with @Malamar1229 on this: yes it is. This is a game. It is not food, water, or shelter. It is not required for my continued existence, or anyone else's. Its purpose is to make players happy. 'Oh lookit, that building over there! That thing is so cool! ' 'Go me, I just beat that really tough boss, I am awesome!' 'I found this neat new helmet, it makes me look really tough!'
...People play the game to be happy. They may do different things in the game to accomplish that goal, but they are trying to accomplish it. If the game is not making people happy, it has no purpose and should be replaced by activities that do. And the people who make the game need to understand that. When you take a job in the entertainment industry you must acknowledge, if only to yourself, that your job is not vital to human existence and your entire customer base could walk away tomorrow if they so choose. Your job is to make them like the game so much that they won't.
Hallothiel wrote: »Those posting about companies only wanting to maximising profit - yes, I do get that -but this is not the way to do it.
They would make enough money by just putting the damn things in the crown store for people to buy at a decent price. They would also profit from customer satisfaction and good reputation - theirs could do with a boost at the moment.
At present they get less of both.
And yes, I am aware that there is another thread wittering on about some gem-rich sweetroll that has posters salivating. That is just sad.
Hallothiel wrote: »enough
Crown crates are here because players buy them. Players stop buying , Zos will drop them and try something else. Casinos are full of patrons for a reason
People need to get over the hate for crown creates. Every mmo that is b2p or f2p has them. If you don't like them then shut up and don't buy them. At least eso has no p2w Insta max lol or 80% of the game locked behind a pay wall like most mmos.
aisriyth_ESO wrote: »We still haven't received any confirmation yet on if they Adamant Horse, Vitrine Wolf and Ebon Senche will definitely show up later outside the crate?
So wait a minute, how does 1 somehow make the RNG more worse than trying for an apex reward mount?