Thrasher91604 wrote: »Yes, ignore all fractional percentages. They are truncated. Only the integer values are used for percentage boni.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Thrasher91604 wrote: »They aren't jump points, just truncation. Call it what it is rather than obsfucating "jump points".
If 75 points are 14% and 100 points are 15%, with truncation to the lowest integer, all points between 76 and 99 are actually all 14%. So, 75 and 100 are, in reality and mathematically, jump points, due to the truncation you mentioned.
It is the truncation that causes them to be jump points.
Wrong. There is no such thing in mathematics called a "jump point". This is just gamer nerd obsfucation of the correct math term, which is truncation.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
I also cannot find what obsfucation is.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
I also cannot find what obsfucation is.
What gets to me is that people researched this, ran all the tests, did the math, had all this work to present to us this important information and then he comes along and his contribution is to step in and say "wrong!" you are obsfucating truncation for jump points! Basically disrespecting all the original work and tested information just to show off is not a very valid approach, I dare say.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
I also cannot find what obsfucation is.
What gets to me is that people researched this, ran all the tests, did the math, had all this work to present to us this important information and then he comes along and his contribution is to step in and say "wrong!" you are obsfucating truncation for jump points! Basically disrespecting all the original work and tested information just to show off is not a very valid approach, I dare say.
Narcissism.
Also great thread, this will help a bunch for us console folk.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
I also cannot find what obsfucation is.
What gets to me is that people researched this, ran all the tests, did the math, had all this work to present to us this important information and then he comes along and his contribution is to step in and say "wrong!" you are obsfucating truncation for jump points! Basically disrespecting all the original work and tested information just to show off is not a very valid approach, I dare say.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wrong again dummy. The original author called it flooring which is the same as truncation. Some other one decides to call it jump points. The name has nothing to do with respect ***. Nor respecting the approach.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
Your pettiness and hypocrisy is amusing for correcting my spelling. Haha....Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow, really lame lack of understanding there buddy. Obsfucation is a real word. Remember, google is your friend if English isn't your first language.
Yes, teacher, OBFUSCATION is a real word:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obfuscation
What is OBSFUCATION? Observing someone... erm.. fu... erm... well? Just drop it. Wrong crowd to try to show off, mate.
You dare to challenge the usage of "Jump Points" and then can't type your own erudite ("erudite" is actually a word too, you know? Look up on Google.) term?
I also cannot find what obsfucation is.
What gets to me is that people researched this, ran all the tests, did the math, had all this work to present to us this important information and then he comes along and his contribution is to step in and say "wrong!" you are obsfucating truncation for jump points! Basically disrespecting all the original work and tested information just to show off is not a very valid approach, I dare say.
Wrong again dummy. The original author called it flooring which is the same as truncation. Some other one decides to call it jump points. The name has nothing to do with respect ***. Nor respecting the approach.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wrong again dummy. The original author called it flooring which is the same as truncation. Some other one decides to call it jump points. The name has nothing to do with respect ***. Nor respecting the approach.
The exact quote from the initial post (bolding mine): https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/340367/impact-of-mage-champion-point-rebalances/p1
"The flooring of all bonuses to the nearest integer has caused jump points in the ability metric for the even spread strategy."
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Actually it's you that has contributed nothing to the discussion. Your lack of understanding of truncation has just confused people.
MarzAttakz wrote: »Respectfully, could you guys please stop the semantic bickering, I don't want this thread to be locked as a result. Short of reading the actual code we don't know the semantically correct terminology to be used but we all understand what is happening yes?
I do not understand it, so I put a point into a CP star and it says that I get .... percentual bonus to something, but the percentage does not really apply, until I reach the jump point for that star??
Or why are there those percentage tooltips then?
I do not understand it, so I put a point into a CP star and it says that I get .... percentual bonus to something, but the percentage does not really apply, until I reach the jump point for that star??
Or why are there those percentage tooltips then?
please explain in simple words
what jumps in cp? i am lost