lunalitetempler wrote: »Why are people so upset about pugs being matched with premades? They already said premades will be matched with other premades.
That's practically impossible this game is not that popular to afford having a solo and group queue, if Battlegrounds were in the base game it will be already a big issue and MM will still take a lot of time.
I would like to see where they said that and if they do it I don't think I will play BG's because when Guild Wars did it (and they have 20 times the population of ESO) it used to take 20-30 minutes to get matched with another team and I'm not going through that in ESO.
@ChaosWotan I am the one, beaten sypherpk nacked 1v1. I am the one destroyed 30 man groups as emperor. I am the reason why elemental wall stacking has been nerfed. I am the one nobody likes. Thats me Shey, Legendary Shey.
If I wanted to kill myself I'd jump from your ego to your IQ.
fastolfv_ESO wrote: »battlegrounds will be where the frustrated people who dislike grp pvp go, it will be a small % of players who cannot function in a regular pvp setting putting themselves on a pedestal, basically every guy whos messaged you going "1v1 me bro!" cause your grp killed his and he cannot cope. Expect every toxic setup pvp has to offer with a mass of infinite dodge rollers, honestly if regular people do bgs it would be a fun experience but expect it to degrade quickly
ChaosWotan wrote: »The problem with BG is that many small scale battle games have much better graphics, like BF1 or Titanfall, so those who like CoD games will prb not enjoy BG very much, while the typical mmo player wants a rpg, with a good storyline, and will therefore get bored in Battlegrounds pretty quick. It's only the minority of "pro" pvp'ers in ESO who will feel that BG is a heaven designed specifically for them, presupposing that BG doesn't flop like IC.
And if ESO tries to "balance" BG so that casuals will enjoy it, then it's most likely that the pros will leave, because it's no challenge for them.
Makes zero sense, first I doubt GW has more active players than ESO today.lunalitetempler wrote: »Why are people so upset about pugs being matched with premades? They already said premades will be matched with other premades.
That's practically impossible this game is not that popular to afford having a solo and group queue, if Battlegrounds were in the base game it will be already a big issue and MM will still take a lot of time.
I would like to see where they said that and if they do it I don't think I will play BG's because when Guild Wars did it (and they have 20 times the population of ESO) it used to take 20-30 minutes to get matched with another team and I'm not going through that in ESO.
Second it looks like they have an as bad group finder as ESO, queues in finder is because too many DD over healer and tanks..
Its a month from release when everyone is crying about what is unbalanced in battlegrounds thats going to be the most fun.
Nether option for me, if youre playing ESO for the PVP, I dont know what to say. Keep posting though I appreciate it, lol.
@ChaosWotan I am the one, beaten sypherpk nacked 1v1. I am the one destroyed 30 man groups as emperor. I am the reason why elemental wall stacking has been nerfed. I am the one nobody likes. Thats me Shey, Legendary Shey.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »ChaosWotan wrote: »Will battlegrounds be noob slaughter? Nowhere to hide, just undressed, right? So will this be the "Counter-strike" of ESO, or will the pros find the whole new DLC so boring that they don't show up?
Pros don't play joke PvP like ESO...
Actually I agree here. There are tons of really skilled players (which is what this person seems to be denying) but, let's be honest, no one is a pro. Pro, or "professional" means you get paid. Until The first ever "ESO World Super Tournament for $500,000" is announced we're all still amateurs.
I really hope that one guy who hates the literal definition of pay to win chimes in to disagree with me.

The thing I like about BG is the choice you make entering them. There are many players that enter Cyrodiil who do not want to PvP because they've mixed PvE elements into it. With BG, there's no skyshards or some such (yet). You go in strictly to fight.
ChaosWotan wrote: »@Ihatenightblades
@clocksstoppe
If Messi is forced to play in 3 division soccer games it will not take long before he becomes "toxic". But it's just frustration, a natural reaction when one is too overqualified to play on a low level. Like forcing a 12th grader to attend a class of 8th graders. It is bound to create tension. It's primarily ESO's responsibility to avoid this.
@ChaosWotan I am the one, beaten sypherpk nacked 1v1. I am the one destroyed 30 man groups as emperor. I am the reason why elemental wall stacking has been nerfed. I am the one nobody likes. Thats me Shey, Legendary Shey.
Hell yes. I am one of the very best and I couldn't take a templar down AS EMPEROR.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »ChaosWotan wrote: »Will battlegrounds be noob slaughter? Nowhere to hide, just undressed, right? So will this be the "Counter-strike" of ESO, or will the pros find the whole new DLC so boring that they don't show up?
Pros don't play joke PvP like ESO...
Actually I agree here. There are tons of really skilled players (which is what this person seems to be denying) but, let's be honest, no one is a pro. Pro, or "professional" means you get paid. Until The first ever "ESO World Super Tournament for $500,000" is announced we're all still amateurs.
I really hope that one guy who hates the literal definition of pay to win chimes in to disagree with me.
well now @THEDKEXPERIENCE you know there's skill, and, then there's eso's pay to win program...
i have no idea what that really means - just wanted to make some hopes and wishes come true today...
for my next act - i will now magically make all the work related incoming emails in your inbox disappear:
well, did it work, did it work???