exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
exeeter702 wrote: »
Templar - minor endurance, intellect and fortitude to the group via restoring aura
exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
All other classes will fall off from Templar healers still, even the Warden. We have the best burst heal in this game. Don't get me wrong, you know I don't like the things being nerfed in the patch notes. But your NB or Sorc healer will never be a choice in vet trials. The only way a sorc can burst heal is through pets. And trial groups will never take pet build healers mainly because the pets will steal buffs from players (SPC, for example), NB and DKs have never been a contender for templars in terms of healing. DO NOT fool yourself into thinking that just because Templars were nerfed that your Sorc or NB healer will be better at healing. What ZoS did, as far as what we can see on paper is that they made every class worse at healing. Because right now, no other class will be able to help DPS and tanks sustain their resources, and with the nerf to resources, it will mean that everyone will have to learn how to manage their resources now, regardless if your healer was a templar or a sorc or a nb or a DK or even a warden.
exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
All other classes will fall off from Templar healers still, even the Warden. We have the best burst heal in this game. Don't get me wrong, you know I don't like the things being nerfed in the patch notes. But your NB or Sorc healer will never be a choice in vet trials. The only way a sorc can burst heal is through pets. And trial groups will never take pet build healers mainly because the pets will steal buffs from players (SPC, for example), NB and DKs have never been a contender for templars in terms of healing. DO NOT fool yourself into thinking that just because Templars were nerfed that your Sorc or NB healer will be better at healing. What ZoS did, as far as what we can see on paper is that they made every class worse at healing. Because right now, no other class will be able to help DPS and tanks sustain their resources, and with the nerf to resources, it will mean that everyone will have to learn how to manage their resources now, regardless if your healer was a templar or a sorc or a nb or a DK or even a warden.
Catches_the_Sun wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »
Templar - minor endurance, intellect and fortitude to the group via restoring aura
This is to the Group? I thought this was a slotted skill, where the buffs only go to the Templar.
exeeter702 wrote: »Again it is not an opinion that healing output from the other 3 classes was on par with templar. That is a simple fact. The argument has always been what the templar brings in support utility to at trial group that the other classes never possessed. This is no longer the case.
exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
All other classes will fall off from Templar healers still, even the Warden. We have the best burst heal in this game. Don't get me wrong, you know I don't like the things being nerfed in the patch notes. But your NB or Sorc healer will never be a choice in vet trials. The only way a sorc can burst heal is through pets. And trial groups will never take pet build healers mainly because the pets will steal buffs from players (SPC, for example), NB and DKs have never been a contender for templars in terms of healing. DO NOT fool yourself into thinking that just because Templars were nerfed that your Sorc or NB healer will be better at healing. What ZoS did, as far as what we can see on paper is that they made every class worse at healing. Because right now, no other class will be able to help DPS and tanks sustain their resources, and with the nerf to resources, it will mean that everyone will have to learn how to manage their resources now, regardless if your healer was a templar or a sorc or a nb or a DK or even a warden.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/325435/non-templar-veteran-trial-healers-memories-with-complete-list-of-non-class-support-skills#latest
Okay let's pop this myth non Templar heal don't in vet trials
Sorry but fact is sorrecer have the best burst heal in live. The templar heal is only half to an ally. Sure they die and still a few ui issues but numbers wise it wins.
Magma amour is being ingored, but assuming it was in a healer hands instead of tanks...Then what would happen in those every died situations? Just saying 2dk healers and tank with yokeda might bypass vMol mechs of group wipes.
exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
I am not "reaching for arguments". I am just informing you that your statement: "A powerful group mitigation ultimate on par with nova with added damage" is incorrect. VoB is NOT at par with Nova.
exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
I am not "reaching for arguments". I am just informing you that your statement: "A powerful group mitigation ultimate on par with nova with added damage" is incorrect. VoB is NOT at par with Nova.
It is just a way to deflect you; calling it an argument. It is simply a fact, in no way shape or form is veil anywhere close to nova if you had the option. When was the last time anyone saw veil of blades anyways? Probably before you went mages guild farming..but yes, I agree with what the OP said other than that...just why? Repentence AND shards? It hurts, we will see though.
exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
I am not "reaching for arguments". I am just informing you that your statement: "A powerful group mitigation ultimate on par with nova with added damage" is incorrect. VoB is NOT at par with Nova.
It is just a way to deflect you; calling it an argument. It is simply a fact, in no way shape or form is veil anywhere close to nova if you had the option. When was the last time anyone saw veil of blades anyways? Probably before you went mages guild farming..but yes, I agree with what the OP said other than that...just why? Repentence AND shards? It hurts, we will see though.
Templars could outheal sorcs and other classes on the premise that they have an easier time activating major mending than the others by simply standing in one of their aoe buff areas. 3.0 is reducing this to minor mending for templars which could either make them even stronger or weaker healers. Why might it make them stronger healers? Because minor mending is an even rarer buff to activate, and can stack with major mending, so essentially we could now see even stronger templar healers with sacred ground + essence drain.
exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
I am not "reaching for arguments". I am just informing you that your statement: "A powerful group mitigation ultimate on par with nova with added damage" is incorrect. VoB is NOT at par with Nova.
It is just a way to deflect you; calling it an argument. It is simply a fact, in no way shape or form is veil anywhere close to nova if you had the option. When was the last time anyone saw veil of blades anyways? Probably before you went mages guild farming..but yes, I agree with what the OP said other than that...just why? Repentence AND shards? It hurts, we will see though.
Nova will reduce outgoing damage to a wider range of players in a trial, veil does not have that reach, what it is however is a group wide major protection buff and group wide heal. It is absolutely a comparable ultimate to nova and an invaluable tool in all of our vet trials. If raid wide damage is going out you want to be within healing springs range anyways, this is why veil is a powerful tool as it complements the very scenario, just like nova, where the group is going to want to be stacked more closely. To you FlyLione, ming has showed more often than not a bad attitude to this subject and is showing restraint right now, i no longer have any interest in having a dialogue with him. The reaching argument was made because i felt this person has done that many times over that last day on these forums. I believe very strongly in my stance and since beta have advocated for a broader reach in role / class diversity in this game. The changes happening, while some more questionable than others are going in that direction and i made this post to try and shed some light as to how the healing role WILL work come morrowind.
That doesnt matter.exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Templar was auto picked because it has exclusive access to a critical sustain tool for a group. That no longer being the case, the other healers are perfectly ready to fill the role as they ALWAYS have been
PS Veil of Blades is far from Nova, even before everything was scaled up. I mean, sure DPS NBs used Veil of Blades every now and again, but interms of Veil of Blades being at par with Nova? It never was. Nova will affect everyone even if you're not standing within the area of Nova. It's not the case of Veil of Blades.
I know how nova works... it is not a parallel to veil of blades... im saying it functions in a similar way, for a different scenario. 30 percent damage reduction to the whole group with a powerful damage component. Nova debuffs the targets within it, when these two are used in conjucntion to one another for example, it makes for some very solid synergy almost crazy that different applications can have different uses and still be compatible with one another and on their own, almost like the opposite of homogenization. Stop reaching for arguments please.
I am not "reaching for arguments". I am just informing you that your statement: "A powerful group mitigation ultimate on par with nova with added damage" is incorrect. VoB is NOT at par with Nova.
It is just a way to deflect you; calling it an argument. It is simply a fact, in no way shape or form is veil anywhere close to nova if you had the option. When was the last time anyone saw veil of blades anyways? Probably before you went mages guild farming..but yes, I agree with what the OP said other than that...just why? Repentence AND shards? It hurts, we will see though.
Nova will reduce outgoing damage to a wider range of players in a trial, veil does not have that reach, what it is however is a group wide major protection buff and group wide heal. It is absolutely a comparable ultimate to nova and an invaluable tool in all of our vet trials. If raid wide damage is going out you want to be within healing springs range anyways, this is why veil is a powerful tool as it complements the very scenario, just like nova, where the group is going to want to be stacked more closely. To you FlyLione, ming has showed more often than not a bad attitude to this subject and is showing restraint right now, i no longer have any interest in having a dialogue with him. The reaching argument was made because i felt this person has done that many times over that last day on these forums. I believe very strongly in my stance and since beta have advocated for a broader reach in role / class diversity in this game. The changes happening, while some more questionable than others are going in that direction and i made this post to try and shed some light as to how the healing role WILL work come morrowind.
BTW I'm not a "him".
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »I would still suggest Templars have an edge for several reasons.
Only class with access to two cleanses. In the first vHoF boss fight it nice being able to grab a synergy to cleans oneself instead of relying on purge with isn't reliable.
Luminous shards still provides more to tanks which use both resources. A big plus since orbs only restore the primary stat.
The second healed can be any class however the Warden edges the group out again with the ability to increase regen, max health and reduce incoming damage.
Sorcs can help with group regen and have access to bigger oh sht heals similar to the Templar, however that heal isn't reliable since the source can be killed.
Since repentance no longer effects the group is templar healer even viable. Their heals are half that of a Sorc and a third of a NB. Seems those that have played templar healers just don't want to lose their trial slots to better healers.
exeeter702 wrote: »Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »I would still suggest Templars have an edge for several reasons.
Only class with access to two cleanses. In the first vHoF boss fight it nice being able to grab a synergy to cleans oneself instead of relying on purge with isn't reliable.
Luminous shards still provides more to tanks which use both resources. A big plus since orbs only restore the primary stat.
The second healed can be any class however the Warden edges the group out again with the ability to increase regen, max health and reduce incoming damage.
Sorcs can help with group regen and have access to bigger oh sht heals similar to the Templar, however that heal isn't reliable since the source can be killed.
We have used purge on our nb healer foe that fight regularly. Its important to note that purge is on demand and instant whereas ritual takes a synergy and applies a synergy cd per ritual cast.
Luminous does put templars in a slightly better spot for the secondary resource restore for sure and imo is the only objective numerical advantage they have.
Wardens Enchanted growth regen is nice but often the buff is already up via pots. Outside of that the potential target benefit is small as sorcs are giving intellect and stam nbs will have endurence up 100 percent of the time. Dk and warden tanks will always have endurence up as well. Minor endurence is generally only usefull to a stam sorc that isnt running weapon damage pots.
Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »exeeter702 wrote: »Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »I would still suggest Templars have an edge for several reasons.
Only class with access to two cleanses. In the first vHoF boss fight it nice being able to grab a synergy to cleans oneself instead of relying on purge with isn't reliable.
Luminous shards still provides more to tanks which use both resources. A big plus since orbs only restore the primary stat.
The second healed can be any class however the Warden edges the group out again with the ability to increase regen, max health and reduce incoming damage.
Sorcs can help with group regen and have access to bigger oh sht heals similar to the Templar, however that heal isn't reliable since the source can be killed.
We have used purge on our nb healer foe that fight regularly. Its important to note that purge is on demand and instant whereas ritual takes a synergy and applies a synergy cd per ritual cast.
Luminous does put templars in a slightly better spot for the secondary resource restore for sure and imo is the only objective numerical advantage they have.
Wardens Enchanted growth regen is nice but often the buff is already up via pots. Outside of that the potential target benefit is small as sorcs are giving intellect and stam nbs will have endurence up 100 percent of the time. Dk and warden tanks will always have endurence up as well. Minor endurence is generally only usefull to a stam sorc that isnt running weapon damage pots.
I am very well aware purge can be used on that fight. It's also not a smart cleans.
It will cleans 6 targets regardless of having something to cleans or not. Use it twice and it will most likely cleans the same 6 players who are already clean.
Purge doesn't even guarantee the caster gets cleansed. It why I think having both cleans available is good or.
Pots provide major intellect where Enchanted Growth provides minor intellect and minor endurance. They stack so it's a benefit that only the Sorc and Warden bring to the table.
Additionally, lets not forget adding 10% health to the group is pretty sweet.
I'm not suggesting other classes cannot heal trials. I've used non Templars as a second healer since v12 was the level cap and after the trials were scaled to CP160. I'm sulky aware they have worked well as a second healer and in an even better position now, just pointing out two classes have a slight advantage.
I don't think anything is wrong with that.
exeeter702 wrote: »
No educated healers would ever use bol as a sticking point for end game pve healing.