UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
Which only harms you IF you buy it and don't get what you want. I've seen systems like this in other games and they do sell well, but you know what they say: Curiousity killed the Khajiit
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
It is that simple though. You don't even need to click on the crown store tab if you don't want to.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
Which only harms you IF you buy it and don't get what you want. I've seen systems like this in other games and they do sell well, but you know what they say: Curiousity killed the Khajiit
Just because I won't be buying them doesn't mean it's not causing harm to me. Moreover, that doesn't mean it's not causing harm to hundreds or even thousands of other people, some of them children, who don't have the mental ability to resist this practice. I mean seriously, how *** is it that the only thing we can talk about is avoiding harm and entrapment? I didn't buy 30k Crowns to spend in some gambling ring, I bought them because I had faith ZOS would keep producing good content for the Crown Store. Even if we just ignore the harm-focused monetization strategy, I'm still going to wind up with half the things I'd want to buy locked in as incentives for a gambling ring. It's horrid.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
It is that simple though. You don't even need to click on the crown store tab if you don't want to.
It is not that simple, they are locking content to incentivize their gambling ring that nobody ever asked for or wanted and that was never a part of the appeal of the game. Nobody signed up for ESO thinking "good golly, I can't wait to gamble real-world money today". They are taking legitimate digital goods and tying them up with a completely disreputable, unnecessary, and unwanted gambling service. I rather enjoy supporting the game and getting legitimate digital good from the Crown Store, but I absolutely resist this bogus and ill-conceived gambling box idea.
Or they could just offer the item as a straight-up purchase. Simple. Straightforward. No RNG. To say that a gamble box is the only way to offer old items is rather silly.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »2. This is a chance to give people an opportunity to get something they missed because they could not be there or could not at that time afford it without directly contradicting the policy of "limited time".
Slot machines are very cheap, too. But there are people who do get addicted to them and bankrupt themselves.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »3. Sure gambling is bad but these things also usually do not cost much at all. I expect these will cost about 300 crowns tops because any higher would indeed be a bigger gambit than it's worth.
Or they could just offer the item as a straight-up purchase. Simple. Straightforward. No RNG. To say that a gamble box is the only way to offer old items is rather silly.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »2. This is a chance to give people an opportunity to get something they missed because they could not be there or could not at that time afford it without directly contradicting the policy of "limited time".Slot machines are very cheap, too. But there are people who do get addicted to them and bankrupt themselves.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »3. Sure gambling is bad but these things also usually do not cost much at all. I expect these will cost about 300 crowns tops because any higher would indeed be a bigger gambit than it's worth.
It comes down to a matter of principle. How is ZOS going to make money off of a system like this? Rational customers know that gambling is never worth it in the long run. I would never touch them, and I assume you would not either. Which then begs the question, why offer them, if not to entice people who don't behave rationally or who lack good self-control? This sort of behavior is predatory. It doesn't affect me directly because I would never participate. But the fact that they are making a move to fish these sorts of players erodes my opinion of their moral compass. And a company's moral standing is important to many people, even if the actions in question do not directly affect that customer--consider, for example, customers who refuse to buy from companies that engage in certain labor practices or that take public political stances at odds with that customer.
Even if a player never buys a gambling box, by continuing to do business with ZOS, they are indirectly supporting the existence of these gambling boxes, and some players cannot have that on their moral conscience.
As for me, while I do find the gambling boxes objectionable, there is enough good coming in this update that outweigh this bad. But, yes, this move does mar my opinion of the company. And, yes, I can understand why some people think that it crosses a line that should never be breached.
They are already kind of breaching that by making them available to those blessed by RNG.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »If they re-offer the limited time purchases as straight up purchases they no longer become limited time which means they flat out lied to people and that would cause complaints.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
Which only harms you IF you buy it and don't get what you want. I've seen systems like this in other games and they do sell well, but you know what they say: Curiousity killed the Khajiit
Just because I won't be buying them doesn't mean it's not causing harm to me. Moreover, that doesn't mean it's not causing harm to hundreds or even thousands of other people, some of them children, who don't have the mental ability to resist this practice. I mean seriously, how *** is it that the only thing we can talk about is avoiding harm and entrapment? I didn't buy 30k Crowns to spend in some gambling ring, I bought them because I had faith ZOS would keep producing good content for the Crown Store. Even if we just ignore the harm-focused monetization strategy, I'm still going to wind up with half the things I'd want to buy locked in as incentives for a gambling ring. It's horrid.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
It is that simple though. You don't even need to click on the crown store tab if you don't want to.
It is not that simple, they are locking content to incentivize their gambling ring that nobody ever asked for or wanted and that was never a part of the appeal of the game. Nobody signed up for ESO thinking "good golly, I can't wait to gamble real-world money today". They are taking legitimate digital goods and tying them up with a completely disreputable, unnecessary, and unwanted gambling service. I rather enjoy supporting the game and getting legitimate digital good from the Crown Store, but I absolutely resist this bogus and ill-conceived gambling box idea.
Or they could just offer the item as a straight-up purchase. Simple. Straightforward. No RNG. To say that a gamble box is the only way to offer old items is rather silly.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »2. This is a chance to give people an opportunity to get something they missed because they could not be there or could not at that time afford it without directly contradicting the policy of "limited time".Slot machines are very cheap, too. But there are people who do get addicted to them and bankrupt themselves.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »3. Sure gambling is bad but these things also usually do not cost much at all. I expect these will cost about 300 crowns tops because any higher would indeed be a bigger gambit than it's worth.
It comes down to a matter of principle. How is ZOS going to make money off of a system like this? Rational customers know that gambling is never worth it in the long run. I would never touch them, and I assume you would not either. Which then begs the question, why offer them, if not to entice people who don't behave rationally or who lack good self-control? This sort of behavior is predatory. It doesn't affect me directly because I would never participate. But the fact that they are making a move to fish these sorts of players erodes my opinion of their moral compass. And a company's moral standing is important to many people, even if the actions in question do not directly affect that customer--consider, for example, customers who refuse to buy from companies that engage in certain labor practices or that take public political stances at odds with that customer.
Even if a player never buys a gambling box, by continuing to do business with ZOS, they are indirectly supporting the existence of these gambling boxes, and some players cannot have that on their moral conscience.
As for me, while I do find the gambling boxes objectionable, there is enough good coming in this update that outweigh this bad. But, yes, this move does mar my opinion of the company. And, yes, I can understand why some people think that it crosses a line that should never be breached.
Or they could just offer the item as a straight-up purchase. Simple. Straightforward. No RNG. To say that a gamble box is the only way to offer old items is rather silly.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »2. This is a chance to give people an opportunity to get something they missed because they could not be there or could not at that time afford it without directly contradicting the policy of "limited time".Slot machines are very cheap, too. But there are people who do get addicted to them and bankrupt themselves.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »3. Sure gambling is bad but these things also usually do not cost much at all. I expect these will cost about 300 crowns tops because any higher would indeed be a bigger gambit than it's worth.
It comes down to a matter of principle. How is ZOS going to make money off of a system like this? Rational customers know that gambling is never worth it in the long run. I would never touch them, and I assume you would not either. Which then begs the question, why offer them, if not to entice people who don't behave rationally or who lack good self-control? This sort of behavior is predatory. It doesn't affect me directly because I would never participate. But the fact that they are making a move to fish these sorts of players erodes my opinion of their moral compass. And a company's moral standing is important to many people, even if the actions in question do not directly affect that customer--consider, for example, customers who refuse to buy from companies that engage in certain labor practices or that take public political stances at odds with that customer.
Even if a player never buys a gambling box, by continuing to do business with ZOS, they are indirectly supporting the existence of these gambling boxes, and some players cannot have that on their moral conscience.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
Which only harms you IF you buy it and don't get what you want. I've seen systems like this in other games and they do sell well, but you know what they say: Curiousity killed the Khajiit
Just because I won't be buying them doesn't mean it's not causing harm to me. Moreover, that doesn't mean it's not causing harm to hundreds or even thousands of other people, some of them children, who don't have the mental ability to resist this practice. I mean seriously, how *** is it that the only thing we can talk about is avoiding harm and entrapment? I didn't buy 30k Crowns to spend in some gambling ring, I bought them because I had faith ZOS would keep producing good content for the Crown Store. Even if we just ignore the harm-focused monetization strategy, I'm still going to wind up with half the things I'd want to buy locked in as incentives for a gambling ring. It's horrid.UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
It is that simple though. You don't even need to click on the crown store tab if you don't want to.
It is not that simple, they are locking content to incentivize their gambling ring that nobody ever asked for or wanted and that was never a part of the appeal of the game. Nobody signed up for ESO thinking "good golly, I can't wait to gamble real-world money today". They are taking legitimate digital goods and tying them up with a completely disreputable, unnecessary, and unwanted gambling service. I rather enjoy supporting the game and getting legitimate digital good from the Crown Store, but I absolutely resist this bogus and ill-conceived gambling box idea.
Much of what you said makes no sense. I get people are opposed to the boxes but it really doesn't harm YOU if YOU don't buy them. Points being:
1. Overall, chances are people fishing for limited items sold and now gone forever will pay MORE for them this way than those that got them when they were available paid.
2. This is a chance to give people an opportunity to get something they missed because they could not be there or could not at that time afford it without directly contradicting the policy of "limited time".
3. Sure gambling is bad but these things also usually do not cost much at all. I expect these will cost about 300 crowns tops because any higher would indeed be a bigger gambit than it's worth.
To those who refuse to buy these boxes more power to ya because I know I won't, but still those that actually WANT to take the gambit why should we stop them? They know what they're getting into...
Perhaps if you had read to the next paragraph, you wouldn't write things that make you look so foolish. Yes, there are players who are quitting over this. No, I am not one of them. Yes, I can understand why some are so offended that they would.jedtb16_ESO wrote: »again.... the bit in bold..... how do you reply to that...
um... so quit then....
/mumbles.... can i have your stuff?
Perhaps if you had read to the next paragraph, you wouldn't write things that make you look so foolish. Yes, there are players who are quitting over this. No, I am not one of them. Yes, I can understand why some are so offended that they would.jedtb16_ESO wrote: »again.... the bit in bold..... how do you reply to that...
um... so quit then....
/mumbles.... can i have your stuff?
If you saw a shady salesman selling a bad car to someone who doesn't know any better, wouldn't that lower you opinion of them, even if you weren't the one being tricked? Most humans have this thing called empathy that makes them care about what happens to other people, even if it doesn't directly affect them. Perhaps you should find yours.
LEGENDARYYY wrote: »..........
...................
..............................
Uhm...
...... wtf?
............
Wall of texts just cause of an RNG box? Cmon who the *** cares...
Go make drama about something that actually makes sense please.
LEGENDARYYY wrote: »..........
...................
..............................
Uhm...
...... wtf?
............
Wall of texts just cause of an RNG box? Cmon who the *** cares...
Go make drama about something that actually makes sense please.
They use these because the chance of desired item is low, so people will keep feeding it money until it gives them what they want. Companies using it doesn't concern you?
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »LEGENDARYYY wrote: »..........
...................
..............................
Uhm...
...... wtf?
............
Wall of texts just cause of an RNG box? Cmon who the *** cares...
Go make drama about something that actually makes sense please.
They use these because the chance of desired item is low, so people will keep feeding it money until it gives them what they want. Companies using it doesn't concern you?
a business trying to make a return on its investment.... it's an outrage!!!!!!!!!!!!
They could make money by offering the item for sale directly.jedtb16_ESO wrote: »a business trying to make a return on its investment.... it's an outrage!!!!!!!!!!!!
They could make money by offering the item for sale directly.jedtb16_ESO wrote: »a business trying to make a return on its investment.... it's an outrage!!!!!!!!!!!!
But random luck? You could buy a hundred boxes and still not get the item that you want (don't believe me? look at the people who ran vMA hundreds of times and never got the weapon that they want). Instead of paying 3K in a straightforward transaction, they pay 30K if they're not lucky.
If they offered every item that you can obtain from the box for direct sale, I would have no issue with this. But they aren't, and Matt even stated at Gamescom that they'll eventually add special items that are exclusive to the random boxes. I have no issues with the crown store, limited-item offers, special items, etc. I don't even have a problem with gamble boxes, as long as they aren't the only way to get certain items (i.e., if every item in the current gamble box pool is available for direct purchase). But to have gamble boxes be the only way to obtain certain items crosses a line that should not be crossed.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whoever buys them has no right to complain though as they knew the gambit when they bought it. Gambling is indeed bad for your wallet but you can simply opt out of buying them...
Just because they're there doesn't mean you WILL buy them.
They're still offering a gambling service, something they have no business doing and something that was never a part of player requests. The very presence of a gambling service changes the dynamic of the relationship between customer and service provider, so it's not just a matter of "don't buy it".
I completely agree.
To buy from the Crown Store, one must invest real currency, so this appears to be a mechanism to introduce a gambling element through the back door. There will be some players who convert many £, $ etc to Crown Gold, in the hope of getting an elusive trinket.
One must remember that gambling can become addictive and that a good proportion of players are probably minors. That brings in question the legality of such a move. I give Zos the benefit of doubt regarding the legality but it certainly brings into question their ethics, morals and integrity.