ArcVelarian wrote: »The fundamental problem is that they have far too much survivability for how much burst they have. Nerf that survivability significantly and nerf the damage slightly.
Whatzituyah wrote: »@Ch4mpTW
Infact one time I was ganked by a Nightblade Duelwielding Maces of I guess unresistable damage with sharpen. That was not a fun time for my poor old Mage Character. I also raged for a good 30 minutes because I was dead in seconds.
Rune_Relic wrote: »The main problem is ZOS listens to anyone.
Class balance should be an equation that balances.
Nerf this and buff that should be irrelevant for and against any class by anyone.
Because opinion is irrelevant.
Its embarassing that players have to point out obvious defficiencies.
But ZOS appears to tune by committee and feel instead of cold hard math.
They can argue the system has complex interactions, unbalancable and unmanageable.
My answer is KISS.
Try to be too clever and all you do is tie yourself in knots and bamboozle yourself.
As well as make the systems almost impossible to hand over and document.
Rune_Relic wrote: »The main problem is ZOS listens to anyone.
Class balance should be an equation that balances.
Nerf this and buff that should be irrelevant for and against any class by anyone.
Because opinion is irrelevant.
Its embarassing that players have to point out obvious defficiencies.
But ZOS appears to tune by committee and feel instead of cold hard math.
They can argue the system has complex interactions, unbalancable and unmanageable.
My answer is KISS.
Try to be too clever and all you do is tie yourself in knots and bamboozle yourself.
As well as make the systems almost impossible to hand over and document.
The biggest problem that we've all seen, regardless of the class we play, or if we do PVE or PVP is that ZOS hires programmers who have flunked "cold hard math" in school. Hence we see tune by committee.
It's odd reading this. I started the game last month. I used to play EQ from launch +8 years or so and mained a monk (i like melee). Every post I found and others responding to me claimed go magicka templar, easy mode etc etc. Stamblade only good for PvP and suck pve solo(my preferred play style) sorcerer/mageplar faceroll game for first character. Despite the naysayers I made a stamina nb and figured I'd just slog through whatever comes(if I can solo an ikksar monk -20% exp and can't loot due to weight limits on EQ, I'll do ok here. NOW some are saying, all around, nb are OP in a month?
It's odd reading this. I started the game last month. I used to play EQ from launch +8 years or so and mained a monk (i like melee). Every post I found and others responding to me claimed go magicka templar, easy mode etc etc. Stamblade only good for PvP and suck pve solo(my preferred play style) sorcerer/mageplar faceroll game for first character. Despite the naysayers I made a stamina nb and figured I'd just slog through whatever comes(if I can solo an ikksar monk -20% exp and can't loot due to weight limits on EQ, I'll do ok here. NOW some are saying, all around, nb are OP in a month?
Except you KNOW that Monks were always the OP class in EQ.
Look, in every MMO the Dev's have a pet class. The one that they really like to play. Maybe it's just the guy in charge of class balance, or maybe it's the entire team, but there is ALWAYS a favorite. That favorite class ALWAYS stays on top. Whether it's armor, damage, skills, spells, or whatever else makes up that particular class, they'll always float to the top. Sure, they may get buffed SO much that the Dev team has no choice but to pull them back a bit via a nerf, but even then they'll still come out smelling like a rose.
It's really funny that someone else made this post, because I was going to make the EQ Monk vs ESO Nightblade comparison myself. They're the "teacher's pets", so to speak, of their respective games and it's really obvious. I mean @ZOS_MattFiror has even stated on an ESO Live segment how much he loves "ganking" other players.
Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
My solution is that they give cloak to everyone else via the Thieves Guild or Legerdemain skill line. NB's will still be superior at cloaking with the passives they have, and it would make the stealth content a lot less punitive toward non-Nightblades, just saying.
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
My solution is that they give cloak to everyone else via the Thieves Guild or Legerdemain skill line. NB's will still be superior at cloaking with the passives they have, and it would make the stealth content a lot less punitive toward non-Nightblades, just saying.
that sounds nice they also should give everyone unicorn mounts that farts rainbows when it sprints Kappa
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
My solution is that they give cloak to everyone else via the Thieves Guild or Legerdemain skill line. NB's will still be superior at cloaking with the passives they have, and it would make the stealth content a lot less punitive toward non-Nightblades, just saying.
that sounds nice they also should give everyone unicorn mounts that farts rainbows when it sprints Kappa
Such erudite analysis, truly your intellect is dizzying.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
My solution is that they give cloak to everyone else via the Thieves Guild or Legerdemain skill line. NB's will still be superior at cloaking with the passives they have, and it would make the stealth content a lot less punitive toward non-Nightblades, just saying.
that sounds nice they also should give everyone unicorn mounts that farts rainbows when it sprints Kappa
Such erudite analysis, truly your intellect is dizzying.
Well thank you I have been told that I'm as charming as a Jehovah Witness on Sunday morning
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
My solution is that they give cloak to everyone else via the Thieves Guild or Legerdemain skill line. NB's will still be superior at cloaking with the passives they have, and it would make the stealth content a lot less punitive toward non-Nightblades, just saying.
that sounds nice they also should give everyone unicorn mounts that farts rainbows when it sprints Kappa
Such erudite analysis, truly your intellect is dizzying.
Well thank you I have been told that I'm as charming as a Jehovah Witness on Sunday morning
The solution is offered because the entire reason Nightblade was the only one to have cloak available was that they ALSO were the only class to not have an actual shield. That truth no longer exists now that other actual shields have come available to them. The disadvantage is gone, and left with nothing but advantage. I'm sorry but I'm very pro-Nightblade and I do think this is a good solution to the issue. Their passive bonuses still give them vastly more preferential treatment while cloaked and hidden anyways.
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Ch4mpTW
Well said, people always run around claiming that Stam DK is so OP in PvP and I'm like "HA! Where?" I fight a NB and struggle if I don't use some detect pots with immovable on it. This patch has buff'd them again allowing them to hit 10k on an ultimate that cost 50 but allows you to stun the player (always) + do increased damage to affected player and I believe reduce their healing like what?
Proxy det NBs still around hitting people who run right near me with that soul tether combo which for some reason I can't heal for nothing when they mix it up with funnel or w/e that ability is called.
NBs need a Major Nerf over all and the cloak spam is one thing that needs to be addressed with the same treatment bolt escape received while making sure all ultimates cost 100+ not some ridiculously low 50.
Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
Sure. That'd be easy to do. ^_^ As for how much I think NB's run the forums...? Look at this very thread, and observe it for however long it remains trending. Or better yet, go and read any thread that speaks out against Nightblades. Lol.
It's odd reading this. I started the game last month. I used to play EQ from launch +8 years or so and mained a monk (i like melee). Every post I found and others responding to me claimed go magicka templar, easy mode etc etc. Stamblade only good for PvP and suck pve solo(my preferred play style) sorcerer/mageplar faceroll game for first character. Despite the naysayers I made a stamina nb and figured I'd just slog through whatever comes(if I can solo an ikksar monk -20% exp and can't loot due to weight limits on EQ, I'll do ok here. NOW some are saying, all around, nb are OP in a month?
Except you KNOW that Monks were always the OP class in EQ.
Look, in every MMO the Dev's have a pet class. The one that they really like to play. Maybe it's just the guy in charge of class balance, or maybe it's the entire team, but there is ALWAYS a favorite. That favorite class ALWAYS stays on top. Whether it's armor, damage, skills, spells, or whatever else makes up that particular class, they'll always float to the top. Sure, they may get buffed SO much that the Dev team has no choice but to pull them back a bit via a nerf, but even then they'll still come out smelling like a rose.
It's really funny that someone else made this post, because I was going to make the EQ Monk vs ESO Nightblade comparison myself. They're the "teacher's pets", so to speak, of their respective games and it's really obvious. I mean @ZOS_MattFiror has even stated on an ESO Live segment how much he loves "ganking" other players.