UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whatzituyah wrote: »@Ch4mpTW
Infact one time I was ganked by a Nightblade Duelwielding Maces of I guess unresistable damage with sharpen. That was not a fun time for my poor old Mage Character. I also raged for a good 30 minutes because I was dead in seconds.
So would it concern you if I said my main's Swords both have Unresistable Damage enchantments on them?
Whatzituyah wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »Whatzituyah wrote: »@Ch4mpTW
Infact one time I was ganked by a Nightblade Duelwielding Maces of I guess unresistable damage with sharpen. That was not a fun time for my poor old Mage Character. I also raged for a good 30 minutes because I was dead in seconds.
So would it concern you if I said my main's Swords both have Unresistable Damage enchantments on them?
No they aren't maces you get a free pass
Replace Nightblades with people and you got an agree from me. Limited intelligence mixed with anger and displeasure with a side of anonymity is the problem.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »
@ShedsHisTail
Wait... You're the gentleman who made the "Confessions of a Casual" thread, yes? And explained how you're not sorry for being a casual and all that... But, you main a Nightblade as well...? I mean, there isn't exactly anything wrong with that... It's just... Dude...
@Ch4mpTW
I've mained a stam-build Nightblade since beta.
We were terrible back then.
I also rarely PvP, so my Nightblading has little effect on anyone else.
Also, I'm super bad at PvP, so my PvP Nightblading also has little effect on anyone else.
@ShedsHisTail
Dude, you're not a problem. You're just a player of classes. Just like me and everyone else. I really wouldn't go out of my way and say that specific people are a problem (unless the situation is extreme enough to deem it so), unless they're cheaters/exploiters (but that's a different topic all together). It's the Nightblade class that is a problem, and its effect on ESO overall.
Have you ever heard the saying of, "Don't hate the player, hate the game?" I believe that saying, and blame the devs (as I said in the initial post). Not the players (to a certain degree).
ShedsHisTail wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »
@ShedsHisTail
Wait... You're the gentleman who made the "Confessions of a Casual" thread, yes? And explained how you're not sorry for being a casual and all that... But, you main a Nightblade as well...? I mean, there isn't exactly anything wrong with that... It's just... Dude...
@Ch4mpTW
I've mained a stam-build Nightblade since beta.
We were terrible back then.
I also rarely PvP, so my Nightblading has little effect on anyone else.
Also, I'm super bad at PvP, so my PvP Nightblading also has little effect on anyone else.
@ShedsHisTail
Dude, you're not a problem. You're just a player of classes. Just like me and everyone else. I really wouldn't go out of my way and say that specific people are a problem (unless the situation is extreme enough to deem it so), unless they're cheaters/exploiters (but that's a different topic all together). It's the Nightblade class that is a problem, and its effect on ESO overall.
Have you ever heard the saying of, "Don't hate the player, hate the game?" I believe that saying, and blame the devs (as I said in the initial post). Not the players (to a certain degree).
I have to respectfully disagree.
Nightblades are definitely the most interesting class I've played in the game. They're more nuanced, rely more on synergies between skills, an require a degree of thought that I haven't really encountered with other classes. What I feel is great about Nightblades as a class is that there is such a quality spectrum from one player to the next.
Other classes have a lot of mediocre to above-average; but it's only Nightblades who can be truly -bad.- That's what you don't see a lot of. There's plenty of videos of really great Nightblades out there making life hard for people, but very few videos of the vast majority who just get absolutely steamrolled.
And it goes in the other direction as well, there are lots of really good players from other classes, but I feel like it's only Nightblades that can be truly Mastered. And it's that nuance built into the class that makes it possible, the subtlety.
I really feel like it's a direction the other class designs should strive for, not something to be discouraged.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »
I have to respectfully disagree.
Nightblades are definitely the most interesting class I've played in the game. They're more nuanced, rely more on synergies between skills, an require a degree of thought that I haven't really encountered with other classes. What I feel is great about Nightblades as a class is that there is such a quality spectrum from one player to the next.
Other classes have a lot of mediocre to above-average; but it's only Nightblades who can be truly -bad.- That's what you don't see a lot of. There's plenty of videos of really great Nightblades out there making life hard for people, but very few videos of the vast majority who just get absolutely steamrolled.
And it goes in the other direction as well, there are lots of really good players from other classes, but I feel like it's only Nightblades that can be truly Mastered. And it's that nuance built into the class that makes it possible, the subtlety.
I really feel like it's a direction the other class designs should strive for, not something to be discouraged.
Now before I get into what I have to say, let me say this: I do in fact have a Nightblade. I have 2 of them. 1 of them is magicka and the other is stamina. Both of them I've completed VMA with numerous times. The magicka one I've gotten flawless conquerer with. I also have managed to have an overall higher K/D ratio with my Nightblades than any other class in PVP, as for every death I have maybe 8 or 9 kills. If not more. So I understand the class quite well, and am not "just salty". Everything I'm about to say comes from experience with the class and what the mentality the class puts you in, and why it is such a bad thing for a game like ESO.
So first off, let's talk about the mentality the class puts you in. The class makes you feel indestructible. The class makes you feel immortal. It makes you feel god-like (according to numerous others). Why? Because you can put out insane amounts of damage, all the while healing yourself at the same exact time. But what's different from this and say something like the Templar's jabs or Sorcerer's attacks with surge, is the sheer amount of damage being done and recovery being received. It's ridiculous. And it's because of this that people will often suggest to others that if you want to succeed in VMA, to take a Nightblade. Actually, come to think of it? I see people tell beginners to create Nightblades if they're relatively new to the game. Because of the amount of damage you can do, the healing you'll receive, and the numerous situations you can cheese your way through. Can't handle a certain mob you've aggro'd or things getting too hot to handle!? Simply cloak and voila. You can make your escape. And even better, you can continue to do so without a penalty being applied like bolt escape. Where as the more you use it, the more and more the cost of it will increase. Nope. You can just cloak as much as you like.
Now on a different aspect of the psychology of a Nightblade, it makes you gather-up with all the other Nightblades and defend the class when targeted by other players for nerfs or rebalancing. Here. I'll elaborate. If you had access to something that was incredibly useful (regardless of how unfair it was to other classes), would you want it taken away? No. And so naturally you'll do any and everything to deflect the attention away from that special something. To insure it never gets rebalanced and checked, and to try and receive more buffs to it. And ZOS just keeps listening to these Nightblade mains time after time, and buffing them. All the while throwing them bone after bone. There is so much bias and favoritism toward the Nightblade class, that it's pathetic. We have had 4 DLC's now... 4. And of those 4, Nightblades excel and shine at 3 of them. 4 technically, as Maelstrom Arena is the easiest to do with Nighyblades. Both on normal and veteran difficulties.
So where is the so-called "class balance"? Because if anyone thinks Nightblades were ever balanced, I have a hard time taking you serious. And I have been around since beta days, and NB's always seemed to have the most unfair advantages over other classes. Always. Even when people claimed "Block-Knights" and other Dragonknight builds were the most broken of broken (pre-1.6 and 1.6 days), Nightblades managed to shut them down the most.
And as always, they flew right under the radar of ZOS' "class balancing" due to their numerous complaints and whines of how the class is fine. And how doing that and this would "ruin the class beyond repair". Well now, those same people have gotten Sorcerers to become ruined beyond repair, and now say baiting comments like, "Sorc tears are delicious." They'll say, "Git gud and L2P". All the while basically zerging the forums in a sense (massive gathering of NB's), and flaming and trolling anyone who speaks out against Nightblades being "rebalanced". It's disgusting, and @Wrobel and @ZOS_RichLambert and @ZOS_MattFiror and the other developers (I don't know their forum name to tag them in) involved with "class balancing" have no one else but themselves to blame for this mess. And they should feel very bad for what they've done, as it is a shame that now for 4 DLC releases in a row? Nightblades are the best class for just about any role. Absolutely ridiculous. So I'm pretty sure that explains the problematic nature of most Nightblades.
You want so-called balance, ESO devs? Buff everyone to the Nightblade class' level, or give them the same treatment you've been giving Sorcerers patch after patch. Make their cloak cost increase with each use if done continuously like bolt escape. Make their fear/Mass Hysteria last 3-5 seconds (at max). "Rebalance" some of their ridiculous passives, and or tone them down like you did Sorcerers. How you have a skill that Sorcerers use be a passive for another class? LMAO! What? But that's balanced? Yeah, no.
Also, to add onto things. Out of curiosity, when TG was about and the whole "cake event" came about... Which class was being created the most...? It was Nightblades. And why is this? Because of the reasons I listed above. In fact, this event also marked the birth of a title called "Cake Blades". All due to the high amount of people shifting to Nightblades at this opportunity. And am I saying people didn't make other classes besides Nightblades? No. But I'm rather saying which was the most frequent.
Oh and on the topic of frequency... Which class do people tend to encounter the most in Cyrodiil? It tends to be Nightblades. And I wonder why it is. Lol. And it doesn't help either that Vicious Death came about, and further boosted Nightblade's potency. And sure, someone could say, "Don't run in groups, and keep yourself spaced out." But who are you really kidding? People are going to pack together and group-up tightly. It's just human nature to do so. When you join Cyrodiil you often hear as soon as you're in, "I have a pretty big group, who wants to join?" Or, "Looking for group." So it's natural for people (generally speaking) to want to do so. And while the combination of VD and the other skills these "Suicide Blades" use has no resource management and sustain — the damage it does makes up for it. It's a ridiculous amount of burst coming out of stealth when paired with things like Proxy Detonation and Soul Tether as well as Lotus Fan and what not. Capable of melting entire zergs (which it often does). And the frequency that was done and is done currently is through the roof. And there were how many complaints made about that combo here on the forums and in-game...? I know people who quit PVP and ESO entirely due to that very same combo being the culprit.
So really, how are Nightblades not a problem to ESO and its community? Seriously, how is it not? I genuinely want to know. Because from what I see and hear day in and day out is a damn shame. And the devs just refusing to acknowledge the problem they've created, and realize just how far out of control the problem has grown. Sounds like a problem to me.
[Edited title for Inappropriate name]
My dedicated PvP char is a Stamblade. I made her two years ago at PC launch.
At the time, that was about the worst possible choice for PvP. It got better, then it got worse, then even worser and then it got better and better and better.
Point being, the class balance in this game changes more frequently than my underwear. I learned to live with it.
And i'll adapt to the next nerf, which i know is only a matter of time.
PS: I have 4 VR16 mains, NB/DK/Sorc/Temp and i play all 4 of them.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »
ShedsHisTail wrote: »
Apparently the word "cancer" is too extreme for ESO forums. Even though it has numerous meanings. It's also an astrology symbol. Lol.
Toc de Malsvi wrote: »I actually came here to read about how NB's were overpowered with a detailed break down of how they have better passives and buffs. However your post was derailed by your zealous hatred of NB's. I will agree that NB's are too strong, yet it is very hard to balance how much utility they have with how weak they can be without the passives. Perhaps you should focus on the specifics of balance and how you propose to fix it other than 1 skill: cloak and how much you think NB's run the forums.
Sure. That'd be easy to do. ^_^ As for how much I think NB's run the forums...? Look at this very thread, and observe it for however long it remains trending. Or better yet, go and read any thread that speaks out against Nightblades. Lol.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »
Hello there,
The word we've felt necessary to remove was the term "cancer". Reason being that it was found insensitive to some members. Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »
Hello there,
The word we've felt necessary to remove was the term "cancer". Reason being that it was found insensitive to some members. Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
Thanks for the reply.
I figured it out.
Noted.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »
Hello there,
The word we've felt necessary to remove was the term "cancer". Reason being that it was found insensitive to some members. Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
Rofl... literally. This is the wittiest and most entertaining post on this thread.
I typically steer clear of posts like this, but I had to let @ZOS_AntonioP know that he's alright in my books
shauny.gibbsb16_ESO wrote: »ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Though there are many meanings behind the term, I'm sure it was not used to refer to Nightblades as a astrological sign.
We appreciate your understanding.
Rofl... literally. This is the wittiest and most entertaining post on this thread.
I typically steer clear of posts like this, but I had to let @ZOS_AntonioP know that he's alright in my books
I admit it made me chuckle too!
On topic; the issue with NB's is skill of play, an average NB player is a pain but managable, a great NB player can be godlike, we've all seen a NB kill someone in 2 seconds, stealth and get away before anyone can react, but if you catch one in a fight they're no DK
Yeah, I agree that NBs are too strong. I had mag DK, then mag templar, but when I tried magblade i forgot about other classes. Good damage, good sustain, good healing, good mobility, good range. Everything in one. I run dungeons and vMA on my NB and it's much easier than with other toons. I even couldn't finish vMA on my mag DK, that was the worst experience I had in this game
nimander99 wrote: »I rolled a Nightblade just before DB came out and thus far my experience with it is ROFLSTOMP and FACEROLL... So I'll agree with @Ch4mpTW .
My main is a Templar and though I have sustain-ability I can't take the cake in vMA or MA for that matter but with my lowbie Nightblade? Well, refer to ROFLSTOMP and FACEROLL...
Also I've been getting the feeling that the content is created with a "Thief-like" class in mind (obviously) and it's leaving every other class in the dust.
Whatzituyah wrote: »What would be a good example character from Super Smash Bros. Wii U/3DS? @Ch4mpTW
Take your time I am sure there is one.
Sad thing is how un-needed this post was. Anyone who has played PvP in the last month knows
60% player base NB
20 % Templars
10 % DKS
10 % sorcs
NB are by far the most powerful class but they fit into their roll - massive burst damage, limited survivability and a great escape. As such they wont see the nerf bat hitting them like the sorcerer because they do what it says on the tin, problem is that makes them the best pvp class by far and the devs know it.