It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
Lol he was a Templar probably specked through the roof in healing. Templars are already doing this *** without the malubeth set.
It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
What the video again. He casts Bol along with malubeth. He never gets below a third health. The one time he did He self heals along with beam. Your problem is with Bol, Templars amazing ability to heal, and the added benefit of the beam.
It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
What the video again. He casts Bol along with malubeth. He never gets below a third health. The one time he did He self heals along with beam. Your problem is with Bol, Templars amazing ability to heal, and the added benefit of the beam.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
It procced nine times in 1:30 of fighting. lol.
Heal to full once/second every 10 seconds for 5 seconds. Pretty balanced set!
You do realize that each hit of flurry is considered a single hit...
You do realize that the set is not suppose to heal you to full?
What the video again. He casts Bol along with malubeth. He never gets below a third health. The one time he did He self heals along with beam. Your problem is with Bol, Templars amazing ability to heal, and the added benefit of the beam.
You watch the vid again - s/he probably would have died @ 45 seconds with a DB DoT on him/her and not breaking the CC, but pop goes Malubeth.
All the people defending this broken AF set...
This set carries so many people in Cyro it's ridiculous...what will you do when they fix it? (Hopefully a hotfix)
Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
The sets not broken, nor is that set doing any more healing to him than it is doing damage to you. It heals, for the amount that it does. The PROBLEM here, particularly that fight I watched, was that it was a templar, you'll notice it took him two casts of breath of life to get back up to full health, which tells me the dude had VERY low max health or a really high crit rating. The 30% heal buff is really not helping this templar at all. His BOL is powerful enough that he would have been better off with a different set. The set is not hardly doing any damage to you, so if you were to say that you got hit for 6k including crits hits, that's what he's healing himself for from this set...not OP in this particular situation.
Now I play a blazing shield tank, I stack health, what I have noticed is that my BOL is my main heal only casting BOL when I'm low health and if I have mending buff, and if I have malubeth procced. All these combined allow me to keep myself alive while tanking a zerg. Now...ive run across smart zergs, who cast bombard, and get away from me...in that case I die, and I die fast. I would be okay with a nerf to either the damage done or the healing buff it gives, just to prevent so many people from bitching about it, does not need to be nerfed to the ground.
Last point, the set consumes all healing done and increases it, therefore making healing numbers seem crazy! There is no possible way that the set heals for that much in one tick, I've tested it on NPCs by letting them smack the dirt outa me while not doing anything and comparing damage done to healing done. It always roughly the same, and a low number, with 2.5ish K a tick. The HIGH numbers are the BOL's and other heals that you do while the set is procced. That 20ish K healing done for a heal specced templar seem legit. With all templar buffs and healing passives...that right. I can get 15k heals on my magick build while in cyrodil, even higher when I'm low health through 10% increase based on missing health. So...maybe needing a nerf? Possibly..but if not, there's no harm in it. It may be over powered slightly, but NOT broken.
Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
Not sure what you are talking about about lol, but anyways my argument is about the 6% proc chance. The set has helped me when I was out numbered by 1 vs. 5+ zergs Pre-DB. If the healing is broken now then I have no problem with a re balance. The original poster stated that the set proced higher than 6% and more like 50% and I was stating the reason why ( the more people attacking you, the higher probability % chance of an proc) They already nerfed proximity det in DB against zergs and now people want to nerf a vanilla monster set which will make zergs even more powerful.
The sets not broken, nor is that set doing any more healing to him than it is doing damage to you. It heals, for the amount that it does. The PROBLEM here, particularly that fight I watched, was that it was a templar, you'll notice it took him two casts of breath of life to get back up to full health, which tells me the dude had VERY low max health or a really high crit rating. The 30% heal buff is really not helping this templar at all. His BOL is powerful enough that he would have been better off with a different set. The set is not hardly doing any damage to you, so if you were to say that you got hit for 6k including crits hits, that's what he's healing himself for from this set...not OP in this particular situation.
Now I play a blazing shield tank, I stack health, what I have noticed is that my BOL is my main heal only casting BOL when I'm low health and if I have mending buff, and if I have malubeth procced. All these combined allow me to keep myself alive while tanking a zerg. Now...ive run across smart zergs, who cast bombard, and get away from me...in that case I die, and I die fast. I would be okay with a nerf to either the damage done or the healing buff it gives, just to prevent so many people from bitching about it, does not need to be nerfed to the ground.
Last point, the set consumes all healing done and increases it, therefore making healing numbers seem crazy! There is no possible way that the set heals for that much in one tick, I've tested it on NPCs by letting them smack the dirt outa me while not doing anything and comparing damage done to healing done. It always roughly the same, and a low number, with 2.5ish K a tick. The HIGH numbers are the BOL's and other heals that you do while the set is procced. That 20ish K healing done for a heal specced templar seem legit. With all templar buffs and healing passives...that right. I can get 15k heals on my magick build while in cyrodil, even higher when I'm low health through 10% increase based on missing health. So...maybe needing a nerf? Possibly..but if not, there's no harm in it. It may be over powered slightly, but NOT broken.
Haydenmango wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
Not sure what you are talking about about lol, but anyways my argument is about the 6% proc chance. The set has helped me when I was out numbered by 1 vs. 5+ zergs Pre-DB. If the healing is broken now then I have no problem with a re balance. The original poster stated that the set proced higher than 6% and more like 50% and I was stating the reason why ( the more people attacking you, the higher probability % chance of an proc) They already nerfed proximity det in DB against zergs and now people want to nerf a vanilla monster set which will make zergs even more powerful.
You haven't seen zergs using this lately? lol
Everyone saying that this is saving them from zergs never fought a zerg using it. Reminds me of the Vicious Death argument...
Justice31st wrote: »Haydenmango wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
Not sure what you are talking about about lol, but anyways my argument is about the 6% proc chance. The set has helped me when I was out numbered by 1 vs. 5+ zergs Pre-DB. If the healing is broken now then I have no problem with a re balance. The original poster stated that the set proced higher than 6% and more like 50% and I was stating the reason why ( the more people attacking you, the higher probability % chance of an proc) They already nerfed proximity det in DB against zergs and now people want to nerf a vanilla monster set which will make zergs even more powerful.
You haven't seen zergs using this lately? lol
Everyone saying that this is saving them from zergs never fought a zerg using it. Reminds me of the Vicious Death argument...
No, I mostly see Molag Kena proccing Radiant Destructions at full health or Stamina Night Blade Snipe Spammers. Maybe it has changed now, but I am also on console not PC.
Justice31st wrote: »Haydenmango wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
Not sure what you are talking about about lol, but anyways my argument is about the 6% proc chance. The set has helped me when I was out numbered by 1 vs. 5+ zergs Pre-DB. If the healing is broken now then I have no problem with a re balance. The original poster stated that the set proced higher than 6% and more like 50% and I was stating the reason why ( the more people attacking you, the higher probability % chance of an proc) They already nerfed proximity det in DB against zergs and now people want to nerf a vanilla monster set which will make zergs even more powerful.
You haven't seen zergs using this lately? lol
Everyone saying that this is saving them from zergs never fought a zerg using it. Reminds me of the Vicious Death argument...
No, I mostly see Molag Kena proccing Radiant Destructions at full health or Stamina Night Blade Snipe Spammers. Maybe it has changed now, but I am also on console not PC.
Haydenmango wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Haydenmango wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »Justice31st wrote: »
bad troll is bad ... try harder
... in the meantime continue to crutch on your broken set and white knight it like a boss... clearly you have learned to play
Lol, so you are saying that if someone who is being attacked by multiple people would not proc the set quicker than a 1v1 duel? LOL you are such a reverse troll. Waaa waaaaaaaaa.
lol please ... your troll game is weak ... and the more you type it becomes evident that you have next to no clue what you are talking about... move along
"This set needs some fix and bit nerf to healing buff it says %6 chance but it procs like %50 chance and heals like a crazy needs some adjustments."
^The OP is claiming the set procs over a 6% chance. Obviously you do not know what you are talking about troll.
hmmm ... norcaljustin right?
says things like :
- Blaba*** owns all, doesn't even use malubeth set.
- Props to Blaba*** for sticking through all these magicka Templar nerfs over the years and still owning.
- Yes, props to blab for not using RD.
- No RD for Blab or Malubeth and still owns 1vX.
So basically you're saying Malbeth is cheese just like RD in your opinion...
and that actual good players, like blab, don't need Malbeth to 1vX .
Funny that you edited your first comment in this thread that basically stated that "players finally have a set so they can 1vX"
Maybe if you spent some time to git gud, instead of hanging on the nuts of skilled players and trolling forums,
you could also 1vX without crutching on a bugged set, that you yourself, basically deemed cheese
It also makes pretty much everything you said in this thread pointless, and nothing more than baiting and trolling.
You got a big purty mouth and I bet this isn't the first time you shoved your foot in it.
Not sure what you are talking about about lol, but anyways my argument is about the 6% proc chance. The set has helped me when I was out numbered by 1 vs. 5+ zergs Pre-DB. If the healing is broken now then I have no problem with a re balance. The original poster stated that the set proced higher than 6% and more like 50% and I was stating the reason why ( the more people attacking you, the higher probability % chance of an proc) They already nerfed proximity det in DB against zergs and now people want to nerf a vanilla monster set which will make zergs even more powerful.
You haven't seen zergs using this lately? lol
Everyone saying that this is saving them from zergs never fought a zerg using it. Reminds me of the Vicious Death argument...
No, I mostly see Molag Kena proccing Radiant Destructions at full health or Stamina Night Blade Snipe Spammers. Maybe it has changed now, but I am also on console not PC.
Seems console is a bit behind then. Every organized raid group I have fought on NA PC over the last week has had a tank wearing malubeth and they are nearly impossible to kill. On top of that there are lots of gankers now using malubeth and they don't die until they are heavily outnumbered. It is the one thing I have noticed lately in PvP that is obviously OP.
Emma_Overload wrote: »It's hilarious reading the comments from the professional AP farmers, QQing because their "potato" victims aren't easy targets anymore. Not only is this set well balanced, but there need to be MORE options for strong healing in PvP. Healing has been far too weak compared to damage ever since the 1.6 patch, and this is particularly unfair in the Imperial City where PvE grinders have to fend off PvP gankers.
@Justice31st Hah you changed your tune pretty quick there.
If you want to debate whether or not the set is OP, broken, bugged, or working as intended in a civil way that's cool.
Just don't start dropping l2p's, implying everyone is crying, and that if they don't think it's working as intended that they are somehow less skilled than you.
You brought it there, not me.
As for the set, I know exactly how it works, and when coupled with good builds and in the hands of good players it's OP imo. Bad players are still going to get stomped, Malbeth can't cure scrub.
Either way it's likely being looked at (with the amount of reports that have been sent in and public complaints),
and probably will have at least some part of how it works nerfed.
If it's not this set it will be another set, then another. People will always find a set to pick on until it gets nerfed into the ground! zzzzz
If it's not this set it will be another set, then another. People will always find a set to pick on until it gets nerfed into the ground! zzzzz
Justice31st wrote: »If it's not this set it will be another set, then another. People will always find a set to pick on until it gets nerfed into the ground! zzzzz
^This is kind of why I went into attack mode earlier in the thread. After Valkyn Skoria was nerfed to the ground, I felt like it is now an ongoing trend. Malubeth has counters to the proc, unlike the other monster sets. It's a trade off.