RedRoomGaming wrote: »Bloody disgusting play on your part zos, just proves once again you are money grabbers.
Where in particular did you get your business degree? Oops my bad you don't have one and I doubt you understand what it takes to run one.
rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
ha $0.91 cents doesn't make or break someone with this purchase and something over $25 is an absurd asking price for anything that's not DLC...good for you if you want to buy into that, they're banking their prices on your purchase.
Even if you're a millionaire, don't you feel slightly suckered buying a flaming panther reskin for $30?
rotaugen454 wrote: »I've been in corporate finance for a quarter century. This is what I do all day.rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
So,.....you win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOOHOO!!!!!!!!!
XD
dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
It doesn't matter anyway I see why you are here now. Every other comment is yours intentionally either having a crack or arguing so have a lovely day/evening where ever you are
It's all relative. If it were $1, most would be fine with that but others would ask if you felt suckered. BTW, a million $ really isn't that much. It's not like you will live off of that for 40 years unless you are really frugal.rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
ha $0.91 cents doesn't make or break someone with this purchase and something over $25 is an absurd asking price for anything that's not DLC...good for you if you want to buy into that, they're betting their prices on your purchase.
Even if you're a millionaire, don't you feel slightly suckered buying a flaming panther reskin for $30?
GoodFella146 wrote: »I'm glad the new mount is 4000 crowns....
....so that less ppl have it.
Besides, I have no problem spending to support the games I love. Surely I can't be the only one who feels like this?
HA HA! funny, right?
But, I'm COMPLETELY Serious. Here's why:
- Unicorns exist on Nirn
- They are VERY rare
- The high price of this item will keep it rare, if existent at ALL
- The question of "Has anyone ever seen one" is TOTALLY appropriate for the unicorn
- It would be a relatively quick mount to make
- If anyone ever bought it, ZOS would make the easiest $1K they ever made.
I just like the meta-game idea of people questioning their existence and maybe THINKING they saw one but wasn't sure. I think 100,000 Crowns is high enough that there probably isn't anyone that would be willing to shell out the money for it, but low enough that someone with a bunch of burnable cash might buy it for kicks and grins.
Thoughts?
dimensional wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
ha $0.91 cents doesn't make or break someone with this purchase and something over $25 is an absurd asking price for anything that's not DLC...good for you if you want to buy into that, they're banking their prices on your purchase.
Even if you're a millionaire, don't you feel slightly suckered buying a flaming panther reskin for $30?
If you buy it, then you obviously don't feel suckered. You feel that it is worth the value of the currency you spent to acquire it. Of course if you have buyer's remorse after the fact that's an entirely different psychological phenomenon.
dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
It doesn't matter anyway I see why you are here now. Every other comment is yours intentionally either having a crack or arguing so have a lovely day/evening where ever you are
Spoken like someone who can't back up their own arguments with logic and reasoning and simply turns tail to avoid a debate which they know they will lose. Have a nice day
rotaugen454 wrote: »It's all relative. If it were $1, most would be fine with that but others would ask if you felt suckered. BTW, a million $ really isn't that much. It's not like you will live off of that for 40 years unless you are really frugal.rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
ha $0.91 cents doesn't make or break someone with this purchase and something over $25 is an absurd asking price for anything that's not DLC...good for you if you want to buy into that, they're betting their prices on your purchase.
Even if you're a millionaire, don't you feel slightly suckered buying a flaming panther reskin for $30?
RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
It doesn't matter anyway I see why you are here now. Every other comment is yours intentionally either having a crack or arguing so have a lovely day/evening where ever you are
Spoken like someone who can't back up their own arguments with logic and reasoning and simply turns tail to avoid a debate which they know they will lose. Have a nice day
No I just do not want to feed the troll. I do not understand your undying need for replies or justification to others why this is so high in price. If you agree with the price move on and let others have their say, no need to reply to basically everyone is there.
GoodFella146 wrote: »I'm glad the new mount is 4000 crowns....
....so that less ppl have it.
Besides, I have no problem spending to support the games I love. Surely I can't be the only one who feels like this?
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
The standard price of $15 for a subscription gives you 1,500 crowns. So it's a 100 crown for $1 ratio. =D
dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
It doesn't matter anyway I see why you are here now. Every other comment is yours intentionally either having a crack or arguing so have a lovely day/evening where ever you are
Spoken like someone who can't back up their own arguments with logic and reasoning and simply turns tail to avoid a debate which they know they will lose. Have a nice day
No I just do not want to feed the troll. I do not understand your undying need for replies or justification to others why this is so high in price. If you agree with the price move on and let others have their say, no need to reply to basically everyone is there.
Labeling someone who has an opposite view of yours as a "troll" is a desperate attempt to justify backing away from the debate and rationalize insane beliefs. If you disagree with the price, move on and let others have their say. No need to reply to basically everyone there is.
leepalmer95 wrote: »That mount costs more than DLC.
Likely because zos put more effort into it than it's DLC.
RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »RedRoomGaming wrote: »dimensional wrote: »Every business is a money grabber. That is the reason for the existence of commerce.
It doesn't matter anyway I see why you are here now. Every other comment is yours intentionally either having a crack or arguing so have a lovely day/evening where ever you are
Spoken like someone who can't back up their own arguments with logic and reasoning and simply turns tail to avoid a debate which they know they will lose. Have a nice day
No I just do not want to feed the troll. I do not understand your undying need for replies or justification to others why this is so high in price. If you agree with the price move on and let others have their say, no need to reply to basically everyone is there.
Labeling someone who has an opposite view of yours as a "troll" is a desperate attempt to justify backing away from the debate and rationalize insane beliefs. If you disagree with the price, move on and let others have their say. No need to reply to basically everyone there is.
Okay I am not replying to anyone but you there for I am leaving everyone have their say. You believe that I am backing away all you want I however have a life and am now enjoying it by not sitting on the internet white knighting for a company that obviously cares nothing for it's customers.
In another note there price is to high but it still looks cool.
And I sure don't see this as greed. This is a non required for gameplay item and is all about fun. Greed would be putting the squeeze on you to buy an item that otherwise would negatively impact your ability to play.