TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »The game is becoming utter bull with these unlorefriendly mounts anyway.
dimensional wrote: »Since I live on a budget, and could have purchased this mount had they told us the price at the beginning of the month but didn't, I have realized I am too poor for this game. Oh well. It is what it is. Enjoy your special mounts people.
Will banking 5k crowns be enough for the next one ZOS?
Yeah this is my only complaint about this, too. I don't mind that it is expensive, I just would have preferred some longer notice of the price so I could have budgeted to get this. And because it's limited, I won't be able to.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
I'd love if they made my irl car into a mount, the fact it also sounds like a dumb truck due to cheap aftermarket muffler would make it all that much better to ride around Cyrodiil in.I want to see a mini tank or car that costs like 10k crowns with upgrades like shinny rims or personalized license plates that also cost crowns. Imagine how much Immersion you could break with that.
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
The standard price of $15 for a subscription gives you 1,500 crowns. So it's a 100 crown for $1 ratio. =D
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
If I had my sub refresh now, i'd buy it even it was worth the 9k i get every 6 months since it went b2p.
It's a Bragging Rights item.
just deal with it, peasants ;3
rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
I've been in corporate finance for a quarter century. This is what I do all day.rotaugen454 wrote: »rotaugen454 wrote: »$29.09rotaugen454 wrote: »bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »Overpriced a tad maybe? But at least it's vanity. ZoS is nowhere near as bad as EA. Swtor locks tons of stuff to F2P players, gives too weak bonuses to DLC purchasers, and gives subscribers every bonus from here to Pluto. The only mmos that I think are close to as fair as ESO is GW2 and Tera.bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »i bought it, but only because i still had a bit of crowns from my recurring plus subscription, had i not had those, i would have let this one pass me by
Congrats ZOS, you pulled a TOTALLY EA move
Look, ill agree that this is not as bad as some of the Things EA does, however a 40$ mount.....This is bad, and something i could see EA doing in a heartbeat, so while its not as bad as the worst of EA, its definatly something they would do, as such, i stand by my comparison. It may not be P2W, but that doesnt really comfort me at all
Where do people keep getting $40 for the mount? Even buying full price 5500 crowns for $40, the mount is $29. If you bought the crowns on discount, it is considerably less.
Many people didnt get the crowns on discount,MANY people,and the mount is $30.00.
$30.00.
$40 for 5500 crowns is $.0072373 per crown. That is $29.09 for 4000 crowns.
So,.....you win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOOHOO!!!!!!!!!
XD