Giles.floydub17_ESO wrote: »How is the cost for this mount to much? The only means to define the cost as being to high is the long does not sell well. This has nothing to do with it being beyond what a specific individual would choose to pay.
There is no mount in this game worth 4000 crowns. However, there is no sense complaining. ZOS is not going to listen. Just don't buy it and problem solved. What is really funny is you will be able to buy an additional character slot for a lot less than 4000 crowns.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »That's $100, that is just sad if you would spend that on a game.KramUzibra wrote: »Ha if it was 10000 crowns I would have bought it. I'm very proud to spend money in a game I love so much.
Eh, had a $50 rewards card that was expiring December 1st so I bought 11,000 extra crowns during Black Fredas.
Budgeted 6k. Reality was lower than expectations.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »ZoS are starting to show signs of not being intelligent, don't they realize they would of made more money if it were cheaper as more people would of brought it.
What would ZOS rather have? 1 person buys it for 4k or 2 people buy it for 2.5k?, you would make more money if both of those people brought it, less people are going to buy it because it's is out of many player's price range.
See this is what happens when a game goes P2W, if ESO was still sub-based we wouldn't have this stupid crown store and none of these unlorefriendly things.
dimensional wrote: »TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »That's $100, that is just sad if you would spend that on a game.KramUzibra wrote: »Ha if it was 10000 crowns I would have bought it. I'm very proud to spend money in a game I love so much.
People spend $100 on things far more sad than "games" so it's pretty sad that you'd even suggest such a thing.
JamieAubrey wrote: »I have 4100 crowns, time to buy this puppy
This explains why they were silent about how much it was going to cost. Now we know to prepare ourselves for sticker shock when they stay silent about the price of upcoming content.
Since the cost of the limited mounts seem to keep going up, will the next one be 5000 crowns?
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »I wouldn't say that.TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »That's $100, that is just sad if you would spend that on a game.KramUzibra wrote: »Ha if it was 10000 crowns I would have bought it. I'm very proud to spend money in a game I love so much.
Gaming is a hobby that people spend money on just like people spend money on other hobbies.
Little League baseball? $100 USD is a drop in the bucket compared to the costs you'd spend on putting your kid through Little League.
RC Cars? $100 won't even buy you half the parts for a single car.
And I can name other hobbies that people see no issue when someone sinks (literally) thousands of dollars into said hobbies.
But video games? Spend some money on video games when that is your hobby of choice, and people think it's "sad".
As I said, I'm not buying this particular mount. I personally can't justify spending more on a vanity mount than I spend on a DLC, but I have already sunk hundreds of dollars into this game, and I don't regret it one bit.
That's not "sad", that's me supporting my Hobby, and a game that I love in that hobby.
Youre not "supporting it". Its not a child support payment. Youre buying a product, exchanging money for a product. All youre doing is artificially inflating the price of items. When companies see this they know they can slap whatever price they want on an item and some one lying to themselves about why theyre spending their expendable finances will eat it up. While the rest of the population either have to spend more to obtain things that would of otherwise been cheaper or go without. Youre known as a Whale. And its not a good thing to be known as. Youre the cause of prices being hiked far higher than what would normally be considered acceptable. But companies cant help themselves when they see someone willing to part with large sums of money in one go.
Now that that is taken care of...As I said, I'm not buying this particular mount. I personally can't justify spending more on a vanity mount than I spend on a DLC, but I have already sunk hundreds of dollars into this game, and I don't regret it one bit.
dimensional wrote: »This explains why they were silent about how much it was going to cost. Now we know to prepare ourselves for sticker shock when they stay silent about the price of upcoming content.
Since the cost of the limited mounts seem to keep going up, will the next one be 5000 crowns?
You don't have to buy them. Let the market dynamics sort itself out. They can price items however high they want to, if people pay for them they will continue to do so. If enough people are buying them regardless of price, it will continue to happen this way. There's literally no use in complaining about it unless this somehow directly translates to a visible decline in sales, they will have no incentive to mark down these items.
dimensional wrote: »This explains why they were silent about how much it was going to cost. Now we know to prepare ourselves for sticker shock when they stay silent about the price of upcoming content.
Since the cost of the limited mounts seem to keep going up, will the next one be 5000 crowns?
You don't have to buy them. Let the market dynamics sort itself out. They can price items however high they want to, if people pay for them they will continue to do so. If enough people are buying them regardless of price, it will continue to happen this way. There's literally no use in complaining about it unless this somehow directly translates to a visible decline in sales, they will have no incentive to mark down these items.
Or just remove it.
Well before they fixed the banker you could argue its P2W.You could acquire more gold mats at a faster pace then someone who didn't buy the banker.dimensional wrote: »TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »ZoS are starting to show signs of not being intelligent, don't they realize they would of made more money if it were cheaper as more people would of brought it.
What would ZOS rather have? 1 person buys it for 4k or 2 people buy it for 2.5k?, you would make more money if both of those people brought it, less people are going to buy it because it's is out of many player's price range.
See this is what happens when a game goes P2W, if ESO was still sub-based we wouldn't have this stupid crown store and none of these unlorefriendly things.
Literally nothing about this game is P2W, in fact I challenge you to point out a single item in the crown store that makes you "win" the game if you buy it compared to items that can be obtained through playing the game normally. Furthermore, nothing about this mount is lore unfriendly, it ties in directly with the dro-mathra from the Maw of Lorkhaj.
Well before they fixed the banker you could argue its P2W.You could acquire more gold mats at a faster pace then someone who didn't buy the banker.dimensional wrote: »TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »ZoS are starting to show signs of not being intelligent, don't they realize they would of made more money if it were cheaper as more people would of brought it.
What would ZOS rather have? 1 person buys it for 4k or 2 people buy it for 2.5k?, you would make more money if both of those people brought it, less people are going to buy it because it's is out of many player's price range.
See this is what happens when a game goes P2W, if ESO was still sub-based we wouldn't have this stupid crown store and none of these unlorefriendly things.
Literally nothing about this game is P2W, in fact I challenge you to point out a single item in the crown store that makes you "win" the game if you buy it compared to items that can be obtained through playing the game normally. Furthermore, nothing about this mount is lore unfriendly, it ties in directly with the dro-mathra from the Maw of Lorkhaj.
dimensional wrote: »This explains why they were silent about how much it was going to cost. Now we know to prepare ourselves for sticker shock when they stay silent about the price of upcoming content.
Since the cost of the limited mounts seem to keep going up, will the next one be 5000 crowns?
You don't have to buy them. Let the market dynamics sort itself out. They can price items however high they want to, if people pay for them they will continue to do so. If enough people are buying them regardless of price, it will continue to happen this way. There's literally no use in complaining about it unless this somehow directly translates to a visible decline in sales, they will have no incentive to mark down these items.
@dimensional Are you buying the 4k mount? Just curious...
dimensional wrote: »This explains why they were silent about how much it was going to cost. Now we know to prepare ourselves for sticker shock when they stay silent about the price of upcoming content.
Since the cost of the limited mounts seem to keep going up, will the next one be 5000 crowns?
You don't have to buy them. Let the market dynamics sort itself out. They can price items however high they want to, if people pay for them they will continue to do so. If enough people are buying them regardless of price, it will continue to happen this way. There's literally no use in complaining about it unless this somehow directly translates to a visible decline in sales, they will have no incentive to mark down these items.
You are right. No one has to buy them. But then there is also no need to keep the planned price a secret so no one can plan their budgets to purchase it. I wasn't expecting it to cost more than previous mounts. So forgive me for being a bit irked about the secrecy about the price and price hike.
dimensional wrote: »@dimensional Are you buying the 4k mount? Just curious...
If I had the crowns I would, but I don't so I'm not.
dimensional wrote: »@dimensional Are you buying the 4k mount? Just curious...
If I had the crowns I would, but I don't so I'm not.
But,..you can buy the crowns.
dimensional wrote: »dimensional wrote: »@dimensional Are you buying the 4k mount? Just curious...
If I had the crowns I would, but I don't so I'm not.
But,..you can buy the crowns.
No [Snip].
[Edit to remove censor bypass.]