Masstershake wrote: »
So just having the crafting bag for free isnt a perk by itself? You need to know that non subs can't purchase it too?
Seriously it shouldn't affect subscribers one bit if a one time purchase player can purchase the bag. You still get it for free with your payment method
I think those assistants should have been free for subscribers as well.
And yes this has to do with the the exclusivity of the Craft Bags,
Sorry, I am going to deflate your argument right here.
I am a Master Crafter (on several characters even) and Crafting Bags are not even part of the equation for me right now. Anyone can be a Master Crafter and handle the inventory with the way the game currently is right now. I do, and I have mats for every level in every profession, including Raw Mats.
Nobody needs Crafting Bags to be a Master Crafter or handle the inventory that is required to make anything for any level character at any time.
Nothing is being taken away from non subscribers by offering Crafting Bags to subscribers.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Masstershake wrote: »
So just having the crafting bag for free isnt a perk by itself? You need to know that non subs can't purchase it too?
Seriously it shouldn't affect subscribers one bit if a one time purchase player can purchase the bag. You still get it for free with your payment method
I think those assistants should have been free for subscribers as well.
It has nothing to do with knowing or not knowing.
It has to do with everyone (subbers and non-subbers) comparing two different options (subbing and not subbing) and if the bag is also available in one form or the other to non subbers, then the non subbing option will be more appealing and stronger than the subbing option. Just like it is the case now, without the bag.
This is what ZOS is trying to change : make subbing a stronger option.
I have to say, reading through this thread makes me really worry about this games community. There is so much poison and entitlement in this thread, it´s just crazy.
People who sub, see themselves as superior and the reason why ESO exists, which is a flawed logic as being a sub is a 10 bucks investment a month, an amount of money that a F2P user can easily overcome by buying a single cosmetic item or a DLC.
That elitism is always a problem at these type of F2P games. Those who invest feel superior to those, who do not, or better put, they feel like they need a reason to be treated better than everyone else, after all they pay their monthly fee or for char slots, bank space ...
I find that attitude very sad, as a game can not survive alone by those that sub, or use the shop. A game is a community and it requires everyone to contribute. Some will contribute with real money investments, others with a steady sub and again others don´t pay anything, but are still the ones who tank for you or trade an item with you.
There was a game once, one guy I knew was our main tank, he was full F2P, never invested and yet did a good job. One day, the company released something that made it easier for tanks, but it was a pay to use thing. He couldn´t pay, so he complained at the forum, just like the OP does here. He was insulted and called names, as it was in the eyes of the others, not ok that he had the beneifts as well, since he did not pay. In the end, he left the game and several others tanks followed him. Shortly after, more and more threads occurred, where people complained about the lack of good tanks, many of them were former elitists who felt superior as they paid.
So yes, trying to exclude others, just because you feel superior will never work out. One day, you might need exactly this person who you formerly insulted.
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Who wants to spend 15$ on crowns only when they can have THE SAME amount of crowns PLUS the bag PLUS the other ESO+ advantages for 15$ ???? Please explain ???
I have to say, reading through this thread makes me really worry about this games community. There is so much poison and entitlement in this thread, it´s just crazy.
People who sub, see themselves as superior and the reason why ESO exists, which is a flawed logic as being a sub is a 10 bucks investment a month, an amount of money that a F2P user can easily overcome by buying a single cosmetic item or a DLC.
That elitism is always a problem at these type of F2P games. Those who invest feel superior to those, who do not, or better put, they feel like they need a reason to be treated better than everyone else, after all they pay their monthly fee or for char slots, bank space ...
I find that attitude very sad, as a game can not survive alone by those that sub, or use the shop. A game is a community and it requires everyone to contribute. Some will contribute with real money investments, others with a steady sub and again others don´t pay anything, but are still the ones who tank for you or trade an item with you.
There was a game once, one guy I knew was our main tank, he was full F2P, never invested and yet did a good job. One day, the company released something that made it easier for tanks, but it was a pay to use thing. He couldn´t pay, so he complained at the forum, just like the OP does here. He was insulted and called names, as it was in the eyes of the others, not ok that he had the beneifts as well, since he did not pay. In the end, he left the game and several others tanks followed him. Shortly after, more and more threads occurred, where people complained about the lack of good tanks, many of them were former elitists who felt superior as they paid.
So yes, trying to exclude others, just because you feel superior will never work out. One day, you might need exactly this person who you formerly insulted.
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Who wants to spend 15$ on crowns only when they can have THE SAME amount of crowns PLUS the bag PLUS the other ESO+ advantages for 15$ ???? Please explain ???
This may be true if you only buy the $15 crown pack. But compare the price with the 5500 crowns for $39.99 and suddenly you might see why we buy THAT crown pack rather than subscribe. It's a 27% savings per crown over the $15 pack/sub.
Really people?!? Do you all read the previous post, or just reply to the last post? Instead of bickering over who pays what. Why not try thinking about and debating solutions that both sides can be happy with?
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Is there a TL;DR?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
The bolded part is actually factually wrong, it's cheaper to get crowns for DLC's only than to sub.
But it's not my main point. Your first sentence made me think of an aspect of the situation that noone has commented on yet : ZOS always promised (and kept that promise so far) that outside from purely cosmetic items, there would never be any item in the crown store that would not be available in the game. That's why we got psijic ambrosia as an ingame alternative to XP scrolls, for example.
On the other hand, they NEVER promised that ESO+ advantages would be available in the game.
That means... that if the crafting bag was made available in the Crown Store for one-time purchase, it would be necessary to add a possibility for us to earn it in the game, too.
Sweetpea704 wrote: »The suggestion that the assistants should be the ESO Plus member perk made me laugh. There would be so many threads complaining about that if it was true!
Tommy1979AtWar wrote: »You can't earn some of the outfits, pets or mounts in the game, you can earn equivalencies I guess but not exact versions.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
The bolded part is actually factually wrong, it's cheaper to get crowns for DLC's only than to sub.
But it's not my main point. Your first sentence made me think of an aspect of the situation that noone has commented on yet : ZOS always promised (and kept that promise so far) that outside from purely cosmetic items, there would never be any item in the crown store that would not be available in the game. That's why we got psijic ambrosia as an ingame alternative to XP scrolls, for example.
On the other hand, they NEVER promised that ESO+ advantages would be available in the game.
That means... that if the crafting bag was made available in the Crown Store for one-time purchase, it would be necessary to add a possibility for us to earn it in the game, too.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Tommy1979AtWar wrote: »You can't earn some of the outfits, pets or mounts in the game, you can earn equivalencies I guess but not exact versions.
I specifically said "outside from purely cosmetic items" (which mounts, pets and costumes are).
I have to say, reading through this thread makes me really worry about this games community. There is so much poison and entitlement in this thread, it´s just crazy.
People who sub, see themselves as superior and the reason why ESO exists, which is a flawed logic as being a sub is a 10 bucks investment a month, an amount of money that a F2P user can easily overcome by buying a single cosmetic item or a DLC.
That elitism is always a problem at these type of F2P games. Those who invest feel superior to those, who do not, or better put, they feel like they need a reason to be treated better than everyone else, after all they pay their monthly fee or for char slots, bank space ...
I find that attitude very sad, as a game can not survive alone by those that sub, or use the shop. A game is a community and it requires everyone to contribute. Some will contribute with real money investments, others with a steady sub and again others don´t pay anything, but are still the ones who tank for you or trade an item with you.
There was a game once, one guy I knew was our main tank, he was full F2P, never invested and yet did a good job. One day, the company released something that made it easier for tanks, but it was a pay to use thing. He couldn´t pay, so he complained at the forum, just like the OP does here. He was insulted and called names, as it was in the eyes of the others, not ok that he had the beneifts as well, since he did not pay. In the end, he left the game and several others tanks followed him. Shortly after, more and more threads occurred, where people complained about the lack of good tanks, many of them were former elitists who felt superior as they paid.
So yes, trying to exclude others, just because you feel superior will never work out. One day, you might need exactly this person who you formerly insulted.
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
Sweetpea704 wrote: »The suggestion that the assistants should be the ESO Plus member perk made me laugh. There would be so many threads complaining about that if it was true!
Sallington wrote: »I have to say, reading through this thread makes me really worry about this games community. There is so much poison and entitlement in this thread, it´s just crazy.
People who sub, see themselves as superior and the reason why ESO exists, which is a flawed logic as being a sub is a 10 bucks investment a month, an amount of money that a F2P user can easily overcome by buying a single cosmetic item or a DLC.
That elitism is always a problem at these type of F2P games. Those who invest feel superior to those, who do not, or better put, they feel like they need a reason to be treated better than everyone else, after all they pay their monthly fee or for char slots, bank space ...
I find that attitude very sad, as a game can not survive alone by those that sub, or use the shop. A game is a community and it requires everyone to contribute. Some will contribute with real money investments, others with a steady sub and again others don´t pay anything, but are still the ones who tank for you or trade an item with you.
There was a game once, one guy I knew was our main tank, he was full F2P, never invested and yet did a good job. One day, the company released something that made it easier for tanks, but it was a pay to use thing. He couldn´t pay, so he complained at the forum, just like the OP does here. He was insulted and called names, as it was in the eyes of the others, not ok that he had the beneifts as well, since he did not pay. In the end, he left the game and several others tanks followed him. Shortly after, more and more threads occurred, where people complained about the lack of good tanks, many of them were former elitists who felt superior as they paid.
So yes, trying to exclude others, just because you feel superior will never work out. One day, you might need exactly this person who you formerly insulted.
In my opinion, everything in a shop should be free, free if you want to really play for it. Bag space can easily be unlocked by achievements or challenges in an MMO, there is no need to make them only available for those who invest, especially since the OP does invest in DLC´s, which is actually more money than those who pay a sub alone. In the end, it is quite sad that Elitism is so wide spread these days, games should be played together, but it seems like everyone want´s to gain an edge over the other, either by being a sub, a raider or some hero in pvp.
And this is why F2P is the cancer killing the MMO market/community at large.
Keep the subscriptions, keep everyone on equal footing. F2P and MMOs just do not work.