Solid_Metal wrote: »the one who said "this game is not true TES game hurr durr" just some skyrim snob, not TES snob i meant you, but SKYRIM snob, they only play skyrim and self-declared as TES fans
MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
but yeaaaaah, it's just like playing pretend. It doesn't feel like skyrim did for me. It's an MMO with elder scrolls lore, but not as much of the sense of discovery and world immersion.
I honestly think if they make an elder scrolls 6 and it is great, then people will look back at this game and say it was just making money off the license.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
but yeaaaaah, it's just like playing pretend. It doesn't feel like skyrim did for me. It's an MMO with elder scrolls lore, but not as much of the sense of discovery and world immersion.
I honestly think if they make an elder scrolls 6 and it is great, then people will look back at this game and say it was just making money off the license.
What if TES6 wont be like Skyrim?
Its all a matter of preference, you know. For me, Skyrim was the least immersive TES game.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
but yeaaaaah, it's just like playing pretend. It doesn't feel like skyrim did for me. It's an MMO with elder scrolls lore, but not as much of the sense of discovery and world immersion.
I honestly think if they make an elder scrolls 6 and it is great, then people will look back at this game and say it was just making money off the license.
What if TES6 wont be like Skyrim?
Its all a matter of preference, you know. For me, Skyrim was the least immersive TES game.
Since the Beta, I thought ESO was nothing like an Elder Scrolls (I played a bit of Daggerfall and Oblivion, and Morrowind and Skyrim extensively - and each at their own time release)
I am surprised to see modders of the series actually feel like ESO is a true ES. Well, it it would not be the first time I've been wrong/in denial
Maybe it's just because I don't play MMO and single player the same way at all, so I can't get the same feels ^_^
But I guess some people actually nailed it : it is an Elder Scrolls spin off, and not part of the series.
It really depends,
If you consider the lore and the world what makes an ES game, then obviously, yes it is.
If you consider common gameplay elements and functionality what makes an ES game, then it's somewhat less so, lacking the be everything and open world aspects that were key in every other ES game.
But yes, I still consider it to be an ES game. Just a different spin off style.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
but yeaaaaah, it's just like playing pretend. It doesn't feel like skyrim did for me. It's an MMO with elder scrolls lore, but not as much of the sense of discovery and world immersion.
I honestly think if they make an elder scrolls 6 and it is great, then people will look back at this game and say it was just making money off the license.
What if TES6 wont be like Skyrim?
Its all a matter of preference, you know. For me, Skyrim was the least immersive TES game.
Same.
Oh, and in response to your other post, something i always found funny if i got archmage before grey fox in oblivion, was 'stealing' the staff from the foot of my own archmage bed and then having the letter get delivered in which i am outraged at taking 'my own' things (game mechanics and whatnot asside). Sure it makes some sense as anonimity in the thieves guild is assumed, but it was good for laughs.
I just started ESO a month ago and am enjoying, but not nearly as much as Oblivion and Skyrim.
ESO has the Elder Scrolls stories and locations and lore in it. However, the gameplay is not Elder Scrolls.
It doesn't have houses, no storage options, and not enough loot, the fast travel system sucks, and the revive system after you die sucks. I will play until I complete my Audiron stories and quests and main story, and then I'll probably quit unless they fix some of these problems I have with it.
Thanks.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »But if we take gameplay features as a main factor, them which game should be taken as a "perfect" one?
Because many things have changed from Morrowind to Skyrim, for example, and even more if you compare Skyrim to Daggerfall...
Since the Beta, I thought ESO was nothing like an Elder Scrolls (I played a bit of Daggerfall and Oblivion, and Morrowind and Skyrim extensively - and each at their own time release)
I am surprised to see modders of the series actually feel like ESO is a true ES. Well, it it would not be the first time I've been wrong/in denial
Maybe it's just because I don't play MMO and single player the same way at all, so I can't get the same feels ^_^
But I guess some people actually nailed it : it is an Elder Scrolls spin off, and not part of the series.
I don't know why you think that - go back 1000 years in the real world - and earth would feel like a quite alien place to be at.
Edit: and from there go back another 1000 years - and the world is again very different - with running water in homes and floor heating even, a working sewer system - things they do not have 1000 years later.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »But if we take gameplay features as a main factor, them which game should be taken as a "perfect" one?
Because many things have changed from Morrowind to Skyrim, for example, and even more if you compare Skyrim to Daggerfall...
Which subsystems you enjoyed from which game is a subjective thing, but I think most people wouldn't be happy if the next ES was a linear rpg with no open world and fixed classes. I think there are a couple of core aspects to what ES games are.
Objectively, the core parts of gameplay that remained consistent throughout the series was the open world exploration, the ability to level all your skills and be anything, and the ability to join all the factions (though you did have to choose between houses in morrowind).
Of those, eso only has the last one, the ability for anyone to join mages, fighters, thieves, and (soon to be added) dark brotherhood.
Personally, I find the gameplay diminished from Morrowind through to Skyrim. Less skills, less stats, less story and guild quests, removing the different swing styles, removing skill requirements from guilds, etc. All it gained in return was better graphics and some quality of life improvements (like not having to open plants like a container to loot them, or having one continuous jumbled journal like you did in Morrowind)
milesrodneymcneely2_ESO wrote: »I LOVE the lore.
I LOVE the gameplay.
For me, this is a win-win.
YMMV.
Yes, but none of that has anything to do with if the game should fall into the same class as an Elder Scrolls game. I love this game too btw.
WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »milesrodneymcneely2_ESO wrote: »I LOVE the lore.
I LOVE the gameplay.
For me, this is a win-win.
YMMV.
Yes, but none of that has anything to do with if the game should fall into the same class as an Elder Scrolls game. I love this game too btw.
Who the hell are you to say that?