MrGigglypants wrote: »LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
Stop doing drugs. Magicka nightblade hits so hard right now in terms of burst in pvp its outrageous.
Yea because magblades have to use lotus fan+proxy set to wreck people so much skill.Am sorry anyone and their mother can play magblade now with the changes to cp and zos giving proxy det away play a magblade is easy as hell.MrGigglypants wrote: »LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
Stop doing drugs. Magicka nightblade hits so hard right now in terms of burst in pvp its outrageous.
Agreed, Mr.Pants. I think magic nb just has more of a skill curve to play well, and that's why mooks can't just jump in and wreck with it like they can with ambush+surprise attack.
and to the original poster, did you *totally* forget about light armor spell pen passive and ninrhorn?
Yea because magblades have to use lotus fan+proxy set to wreck people so much skill.Am sorry anyone and their mother can play magblade now with the changes to cp and zos giving proxy det away play a magblade is easy as hell.MrGigglypants wrote: »LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
Stop doing drugs. Magicka nightblade hits so hard right now in terms of burst in pvp its outrageous.
Agreed, Mr.Pants. I think magic nb just has more of a skill curve to play well, and that's why mooks can't just jump in and wreck with it like they can with ambush+surprise attack.
and to the original poster, did you *totally* forget about light armor spell pen passive and ninrhorn?
10k proxy on me by myself proves you wrong.CC is so broken that at full stamina in the sewers I can't cc break from fear for 5 seconds and then its to late, you can't block because this crap is broken so it makes it easy to just kill people,leepalmer95 wrote: »Yea because magblades have to use lotus fan+proxy set to wreck people so much skill.Am sorry anyone and their mother can play magblade now with the changes to cp and zos giving proxy det away play a magblade is easy as hell.MrGigglypants wrote: »LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
Stop doing drugs. Magicka nightblade hits so hard right now in terms of burst in pvp its outrageous.
Agreed, Mr.Pants. I think magic nb just has more of a skill curve to play well, and that's why mooks can't just jump in and wreck with it like they can with ambush+surprise attack.
and to the original poster, did you *totally* forget about light armor spell pen passive and ninrhorn?
Proxy does more dmg enemies but less single target, Besides a lot of people have a lot more spell resist than physical resist, you can also block proxy and make it hit for like 2k...
Strider_Roshin wrote: »The_Outsider wrote: »Strider_Roshin wrote: »Magicka is overpowered at the moment. Yes we're still around, but magicka is currently hitting harder, has by far better resource management and survivability.
I've been a Nord Stamina Nightblade since PC beta. It's what I enjoy, and I'm not planning on changing. Yes I have many other different characters, but I just enjoy this play style the most.
Agree w/ this. Stamina Nightblade fits my personality.
EDIT: Idk if I'd say overpowered. They got buffed for sure. Maybe the good ones are OP. But there's a lot of bads. But that's all NBs I guess!
Staves get buffed from three different champion points, several magicka abilities such as radiant destruction, puncturing sweep, proxy det, bat swarm, meteor etc. Get buffed from two champion points. Stamina abilities (with the exception of rapid strikes, and biting jabs) only get buffed by one. The reason they're overpowered is due to lazy coding. Too many abilities in this game are coded as DoTs when they're really not.
10k proxy on me by myself proves you wrong.CC is so broken that at full stamina in the sewers I can't cc break from fear for 5 seconds and then its to late, you can't block because this crap is broken so it makes it easy to just kill people,leepalmer95 wrote: »Yea because magblades have to use lotus fan+proxy set to wreck people so much skill.Am sorry anyone and their mother can play magblade now with the changes to cp and zos giving proxy det away play a magblade is easy as hell.MrGigglypants wrote: »LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
Stop doing drugs. Magicka nightblade hits so hard right now in terms of burst in pvp its outrageous.
Agreed, Mr.Pants. I think magic nb just has more of a skill curve to play well, and that's why mooks can't just jump in and wreck with it like they can with ambush+surprise attack.
and to the original poster, did you *totally* forget about light armor spell pen passive and ninrhorn?
Proxy does more dmg enemies but less single target, Besides a lot of people have a lot more spell resist than physical resist, you can also block proxy and make it hit for like 2k...