WillhelmBlack wrote: »They're still the hardest hitting, there's tons left. Getting 14K Sniped left, right and centre. Our small group was showed up big time just a couple days ago by one cheeky little stamblade. Think he was only vr3, but he had tons of regeneration and hit hard as hell.
LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Stam NB still hits harder than a Magblade even if their opponent has 100 points in Hardy.
Why?
Spell damage is still more heavily mitigated by like...three other champion trees?
Magblade has to cheese hard to do as much damage as a Stamblade though and a Magblade HAS to do it from stealth.
You know what I mean...a Stamblade for example can ambush in and three shot SA you down unless you're a dergin-knight out of stealth with a couple cloaks every now and again to make their opponent's hard hitting moves miss the Stamblade.
A Magblade has to buff up and drop an ult (soul tether) and time it with prox det and sometimes follow it up with Concealed blades...everything but the CB has to be done from stealth for it to be effective.
I do see why a lot of ppl switched though, ppl on that band wagon of "Magblade can kill groups, Stamblade can't."
Magblade does feel like it instakills but it takes a lot more preparation to do something Stamblade can do without using an ult for example.
LBxFinalDeath wrote: »Well I never said Magblade can't under any circumstance do as much damage as Stamblade.
I simply said it takes a lot of preparation for Magblade to do so...while a Stamblade as I also said can just buff up with rally and be done with buffs in most cases...switch back to dual wield...then ambush in and shred their target quickly.
In order for a Magblade to do as much dmg as a Stamblade it requires potions and every buff at their disposal an ult and prox det ontop of concealed blade if it doesn't drop them...all of which has to be done from stealth in order to be as effective as possible.
It all comes down to...magic damage is heavily mitigated all around.
Races by default mitigate it due to most races' passives giving extra spell resist.
Then theres like 3 champion point tree lines that mitigate it or further buff your spell resistance which inherently is a mitigation method for nerfing magic damage done to you. (Most of which are easy choices for 99% of players since the other options tend to be useless or situational)
Stamblade just has to deal with hardy and armor resist....and most aren't going for Hardy since everyones going magic....also since everyones going light armor they have even less resist against the surprise attack spam.
imo Stamblade is the easy choice if you are a solo player who doesn't run head first into zergs, deals as much damage as magblade (technically more because of whats mentioned earlier) in pretty much half the time.
Guess you can say Stamblade is just easier to play.
I won't be shocked if you guys see Stamblade return in force since it technically should be extremely easy picking if you hit hard with physical dmg.
leepalmer95 wrote: »Most of my magicka character have like 25k spell resist and only around 13k physical resist.
Stam blades still hit very hard.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »Magicka is overpowered at the moment. Yes we're still around, but magicka is currently hitting harder, has by far better resource management and survivability.
I've been a Nord Stamina Nightblade since PC beta. It's what I enjoy, and I'm not planning on changing. Yes I have many other different characters, but I just enjoy this play style the most.
Me and Sabre Ali are still kicking ass with stam NB @sabresandiego_ESO
-Tam
Strider_Roshin wrote: »Magicka is overpowered at the moment. Yes we're still around, but magicka is currently hitting harder, has by far better resource management and survivability.
I've been a Nord Stamina Nightblade since PC beta. It's what I enjoy, and I'm not planning on changing. Yes I have many other different characters, but I just enjoy this play style the most.
Strider_Roshin wrote: »Magicka is overpowered at the moment. Yes we're still around, but magicka is currently hitting harder, has by far better resource management and survivability.
I've been a Nord Stamina Nightblade since PC beta. It's what I enjoy, and I'm not planning on changing. Yes I have many other different characters, but I just enjoy this play style the most.
You brave, brave, soul.
The_Outsider wrote: »Strider_Roshin wrote: »Magicka is overpowered at the moment. Yes we're still around, but magicka is currently hitting harder, has by far better resource management and survivability.
I've been a Nord Stamina Nightblade since PC beta. It's what I enjoy, and I'm not planning on changing. Yes I have many other different characters, but I just enjoy this play style the most.
Agree w/ this. Stamina Nightblade fits my personality.
EDIT: Idk if I'd say overpowered. They got buffed for sure. Maybe the good ones are OP. But there's a lot of bads. But that's all NBs I guess!