scorpiodog wrote: »I see so many absurd comments on this forum and in Youtube videos I feel the need for a basic lesson in the realities of Business:
People invest in a business to make money. Yes, it would be nice if any company actually cared more about their customers than their bottom line, but that just isn't going to happen. Whole Foods, WallMart, Blizzard, Wizzards of the Coast - they all operate with shareholders as their first, second, and third priority. At best they try to PRETEND they care about you more than their bottom line, but they don't. If you can' accept that you have a very disappointing future ahead of you. Heck, even Greenpeace is more concerned about revenues than actually solving environmental problems and they aren't even a for-profit organization. Try telling Greenpeace how they can improve and see how far you get, lmao.
Every Cost and Risk must be assessed for expected gain "It would be cool if" is not a reason to expend R&D. If you want a company to change something, you have to explain how that up-front expenditure will turn a profit.
Purchasing a product does not give you any "say" Try writing a strongly worded letter to any fast food joint that you are a customer and as such, you suggest they use romaine lettuce instead of iceberg lettuce. There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger - no question at all, but that doesn't mean they will do what you say just because you bought a few burgers there. Pick any other company and any other product and it is the same - just because you purchase a product does not mean you have ANY say in management decisions, marketing, right to protest on their property against them, or whatever.
Freedom of speech is a right, but so is refusal of service Frankly if someone comes to my place of business IRL and starts loudly complaining I show them the door. If they have legitimate concerns and bring them up in a mature way, I deal with them. But if they start getting an attitude or think I owe them anything they can bring their unprofitable problems to my competitors and good riddance. You are customers, not members of a cooperative.
Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
If you could do it better, you would have alreadyThere may be a few ESO customers who can put together million-dollar deals and convince investors to put money into a "cool idea" for a video game, but more than likely if they cold they would have already and we would be playing your game. That means that in all likelihood your "cool idea" is only that - cool - but not profitable or technically workable.
The customer is always right Hahahahahahaha - HA! If you actually believe companies when they tell you this, well ... let's just say I never want to eat in a restaurant with you. You probably don't realize the crimes against humanity that are being inflicted upon your seven-course meal when you send your soup back for being too hot.
Now, nothing in this post is meant to say that legitimate concerns and problems are not valid reasons to complain - submit a ticket and it will either be solved or it won't and then you can make a decision to leave or to stay. I'm just tired of seeing so much MMO VETERAN CRYBABY talk. If you are going to leave because your every whim isn't catered to - then leave. Nobody probably cares because you are a problem customer and worst sin of all, unprofitable. Stop blowing through a year's worth of good RPG content in less than a week and then complaining no one is making content to meet your special snowflake needs. And stop talking about you were here "from the beginning". Yeah, and I played Daggerfall in the 1990s - no one cares if you started ESO in 2014 or how many thousands of hours you've played since then. Right now you're not helping.
ThatGuyCameron wrote: »I've been here for 2 months and I'm tired of these bugs im quitin
ThatGuyCameron wrote: »I've been here for 2 months and I'm tired of these bugs im quitin
scorpiodog wrote: »Every Cost and Risk must be assessed for expected gain "It would be cool if" is not a reason to expend R&D. If you want a company to change something, you have to explain how that up-front expenditure will turn a profit.
Give this guy an award for best thread ever made on these forums.
AMEN! Ive finally found an ally that agrees with the way I see all these complaints.
"If it doesnt make money, it doesnt make sense"
Haha some people on these forums genuinely believe they can hold the MMO of the year 2015 with all their power and money at ransom by threatening to "quit" which they never even do! Its quite comical. Youre all deluded if you think ZOS should listen to you at all costs because you and your little friends dont like a bit of lag here and there for what is a an absolutely huge game.
Theres an option called close application. If you dont like ESO, click that and never open it up again.
Purchasing a product does not give you any "say" Try writing a strongly worded letter to any fast food joint that you are a customer and as such, you suggest they use romaine lettuce instead of iceberg lettuce. There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger - no question at all, but that doesn't mean they will do what you say just because you bought a few burgers there. Pick any other company and any other product and it is the same - just because you purchase a product does not mean you have ANY say in management decisions, marketing, right to protest on their property against them, or whatever.
Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
The customer is always right Hahahahahahaha - HA! If you actually believe companies when they tell you this, well ... let's just say I never want to eat in a restaurant with you. You probably don't realize the crimes against humanity that are being inflicted upon your seven-course meal when you send your soup back for being too hot.
tired already ? .... boy you new to mmos?ThatGuyCameron wrote: »I've been here for 2 months and I'm tired of these bugs im quitin
Yes, which is one reason why I'm only a casual gamer.Ahem...have YOU ever worked in a real business?
scorpiodog wrote: »I see so many absurd comments on this forum and in Youtube videos I feel the need for a basic lesson in the realities of Business:
People invest in a business to make money. Yes, it would be nice if any company actually cared more about their customers than their bottom line, but that just isn't going to happen. Whole Foods, WallMart, Blizzard, Wizzards of the Coast - they all operate with shareholders as their first, second, and third priority. At best they try to PRETEND they care about you more than their bottom line, but they don't. If you can' accept that you have a very disappointing future ahead of you. Heck, even Greenpeace is more concerned about revenues than actually solving environmental problems and they aren't even a for-profit organization. Try telling Greenpeace how they can improve and see how far you get, lmao.
Every Cost and Risk must be assessed for expected gain "It would be cool if" is not a reason to expend R&D. If you want a company to change something, you have to explain how that up-front expenditure will turn a profit.
Purchasing a product does not give you any "say" Try writing a strongly worded letter to any fast food joint that you are a customer and as such, you suggest they use romaine lettuce instead of iceberg lettuce. There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger - no question at all, but that doesn't mean they will do what you say just because you bought a few burgers there. Pick any other company and any other product and it is the same - just because you purchase a product does not mean you have ANY say in management decisions, marketing, right to protest on their property against them, or whatever.
Freedom of speech is a right, but so is refusal of service Frankly if someone comes to my place of business IRL and starts loudly complaining I show them the door. If they have legitimate concerns and bring them up in a mature way, I deal with them. But if they start getting an attitude or think I owe them anything they can bring their unprofitable problems to my competitors and good riddance. You are customers, not members of a cooperative.
Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
If you could do it better, you would have alreadyThere may be a few ESO customers who can put together million-dollar deals and convince investors to put money into a "cool idea" for a video game, but more than likely if they cold they would have already and we would be playing your game. That means that in all likelihood your "cool idea" is only that - cool - but not profitable or technically workable.
The customer is always right Hahahahahahaha - HA! If you actually believe companies when they tell you this, well ... let's just say I never want to eat in a restaurant with you. You probably don't realize the crimes against humanity that are being inflicted upon your seven-course meal when you send your soup back for being too hot.
Now, nothing in this post is meant to say that legitimate concerns and problems are not valid reasons to complain - submit a ticket and it will either be solved or it won't and then you can make a decision to leave or to stay. I'm just tired of seeing so much MMO VETERAN CRYBABY talk. If you are going to leave because your every whim isn't catered to - then leave. Nobody probably cares because you are a problem customer and worst sin of all, unprofitable. Stop blowing through a year's worth of good RPG content in less than a week and then complaining no one is making content to meet your special snowflake needs. And stop talking about you were here "from the beginning". Yeah, and I played Daggerfall in the 1990s - no one cares if you started ESO in 2014 or how many thousands of hours you've played since then. Right now you're not helping.
SeptimusDova wrote: »Scorpio so after all you wrote you have elevated yourself to the point where you call others fools? Pretty crass don't you think.Most here really don't care what "you" see. Much like most don't care about what "I" think.
People want to enjoy the game that is why they play it. They bring up issues and ZOS manner and frequency of communications is insufficient for them.
I find it very humorous that others say and call people things in such terminology that earned me account suspensions. Rant and opinions are fine, mind the rules and enjoy your stay or be like me and be only one bad post away from being perma banned.
mommadani907 wrote: »Ok, I'm going to say it. I tried not to, I really did lol.
You had a really great opportunity here to just state some facts about how businesses operate. And while I don't agree 100% with what you said in that regard, I can see where you are coming from to a degree.
After that, dude. Really? Was it at all necessary to go on your own tangents about how you perceive "hardcore MMO players" as some sort of cancer? Not exactly your words, but you get the idea. All the name calling didn't exactly make you look very professional or classy or intelligent.
I wouldn't say that I'm hardcore, but I have been around forever, and I do care about the state of the game. However, my voice, is substantially calmer, because that is who I am. That being said, I think it is incredibly sad that we have lost a lot of really great voices recently. They left. And I don't think they are coming back. And it wasn't because they didn't get their "special snowflake" way, it was because things are broken and have been broken for a long time. And that too is very sad.
We can all agree to disagree. People can continue to not see problems. People can continue to have fun despite the problems too. I am, mostly. But I am also frustrated.
And finally, if you are so against the video rant, why even bring it up? Quit giving it free publicity if you hate the video and the dude so much.
mommadani907 wrote: »Ok, I'm going to say it. I tried not to, I really did lol.
You had a really great opportunity here to just state some facts about how businesses operate. And while I don't agree 100% with what you said in that regard, I can see where you are coming from to a degree.
After that, dude. Really? Was it at all necessary to go on your own tangents about how you perceive "hardcore MMO players" as some sort of cancer? Not exactly your words, but you get the idea. All the name calling didn't exactly make you look very professional or classy or intelligent.
I wouldn't say that I'm hardcore, but I have been around forever, and I do care about the state of the game. However, my voice, is substantially calmer, because that is who I am. That being said, I think it is incredibly sad that we have lost a lot of really great voices recently. They left. And I don't think they are coming back. And it wasn't because they didn't get their "special snowflake" way, it was because things are broken and have been broken for a long time. And that too is very sad.
We can all agree to disagree. People can continue to not see problems. People can continue to have fun despite the problems too. I am, mostly. But I am also frustrated.
And finally, if you are so against the video rant, why even bring it up? Quit giving it free publicity if you hate the video and the dude so much.
stewhead2ub17_ESO wrote: »There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger -
Love this post! However, "taste" is a personal preference. There is no scientific evidence that supports Romaine lettuce is tastier on a burger than Iceburg.
I'm sure my concerns are gong to be overshadowed by those that are excited about Assistants. Most players just see a merchant they can access anywhere and are excited about the time saving mechanic. There are, however, some legitimate concerns regarding the current PTS implementation of Assistants. I personally try to look at what is good for the game and not just at what is good for Gid. All of my feedback can be filed under "General Feedback" maybe even tack on the word "Concerns" to that...
I wanted to wait to give feedback on the assistants concept until I actually got to check them out for myself and they appear to function similarly to how I feared they would. My chief concern with these is that Assistants will essentially remove one of the biggest reasons we have to visit towns. Now, I am not so much concerned with the functionality of the Assistants, I am concerned with the "permanent" nature of them.
Back in Feb 2015, I suggested the following on this thread (http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/149698/summonable-beast-merchants-and-banker-concept/p1)
- A Mudcrab Merchant
- A Creeper Fence
- A Goblin Banker
In that thread I suggested the summonable merchants (assistants) be attached to consumables bought in the crown store. These items would be a consistent source of revenue... not a one time purchase.
I even suggested that ESO+ players be given reusable versions of these consumable items with a healthy cooldown in this thread here (http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/150450/eso-subscription-benefits-suggestions/p1), which would create value for the ESO+ sub.
The decision to NOT attach Assistants to consumables baffles me... especially considering that as a one time purchase, you buy them and you never EVER have to go to a merchant or your personal bank again.
This just seems like a really shortsighted design decision that will have a negative impact on possible future revenue generating crown store additions, such as bags (http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/162693/more-bags-and-encumbrance-concepts/p1).
Why would players buy additional bag space if they have a merchant to sell items to or a banker to access their bank for absolutely no additional cost? If the assistants were accessible via a consumable or had a cooldown (ESO+ suggestion above) players would regularly come upon situations where they have to make the decision to either buy more consumable items from the crown store or to go back to town. If ZOS added bags then players would have an additional choice in those situations. The point here is, with the Assistants designed as they are ZOS severely limits their options in the future, in terms of game mechanics and revenue generating items that could be added to the Crown Store.
Those are just my monetization and gameplay concerns. I'm also concerned with the fact that they are people... That decision seems odd, especially since The Elder Scrolls offers other alternatives. Having every player being allowed to summon a random mudcrab, a creeper, or a goblin makes MUCH more sense than having every player summon the EXACT same NPC to follow them around.
I sincerely hope @ZOS_RichLambert encourages the content designers to start looking at what players are suggesting when they go about designing an addition to ESO. I hope future Crown Store offerings are looking at ways to grow the game for the long haul and offer items that will not damage the established ESO game environment while simultaneously creating a long term revenue stream and not just offer items that will make an immediate buck.
If ZOS moves forward with the current Assistant design I truly believe they will have a long term negative impact on ESO... but if they are released, please release "skins" for these assistants over time to add variation to these tools. If ZOS releases skins regularly for these items, they can establish that regular revenue stream (until a player finds the ONE they want, of course), and there will be variety in game so everyone doesn't have the exact same assistants.
As a concept, Assistants are a great addition to ESO, but the current implementation on PTS is lacking.
People invest in a business to make money. Yes, it would be nice if any company actually cared more about their customers than their bottom line, but that just isn't going to happen. Whole Foods, WallMart, Blizzard, Wizzards of the Coast - they all operate with shareholders as their first, second, and third priority. At best they try to PRETEND they care about you more than their bottom line, but they don't. If you can' accept that you have a very disappointing future ahead of you. Heck, even Greenpeace is more concerned about revenues than actually solving environmental problems and they aren't even a for-profit organization. Try telling Greenpeace how they can improve and see how far you get, lmao.
Purchasing a product does not give you any "say" Try writing a strongly worded letter to any fast food joint that you are a customer and as such, you suggest they use romaine lettuce instead of iceberg lettuce. There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger - no question at all, but that doesn't mean they will do what you say just because you bought a few burgers there. Pick any other company and any other product and it is the same - just because you purchase a product does not mean you have ANY say in management decisions, marketing, right to protest on their property against them, or whatever.
Freedom of speech is a right, but so is refusal of service Frankly if someone comes to my place of business IRL and starts loudly complaining I show them the door. If they have legitimate concerns and bring them up in a mature way, I deal with them. But if they start getting an attitude or think I owe them anything they can bring their unprofitable problems to my competitors and good riddance. You are customers, not members of a cooperative.
Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
People invest in a business to make money. Yes, it would be nice if any company actually cared more about their customers than their bottom line, but that just isn't going to happen. Whole Foods, WallMart, Blizzard, Wizzards of the Coast - they all operate with shareholders as their first, second, and third priority. At best they try to PRETEND they care about you more than their bottom line, but they don't. If you can' accept that you have a very disappointing future ahead of you. Heck, even Greenpeace is more concerned about revenues than actually solving environmental problems and they aren't even a for-profit organization. Try telling Greenpeace how they can improve and see how far you get, lmao.
You get this backwards a bit. Yes a business is there to make money, that is very evident. However any business needs costumers to survive, and when your business is build and based around a trade relation, the costumer becomes the most important aspect. Also take into consideration that in order to get an income, the business needs to transfer its goods to a costumer and get money from it.
In any thriving and good business build on consumers, keeping consumers happy is the number one priority. The shareholders' priority is actually lesser than that of the company, in financials it's stated that you can withheld part of the shareholder's cut if needed to sustain the company financially.Purchasing a product does not give you any "say" Try writing a strongly worded letter to any fast food joint that you are a customer and as such, you suggest they use romaine lettuce instead of iceberg lettuce. There is no question that romaine makes a tastier burger - no question at all, but that doesn't mean they will do what you say just because you bought a few burgers there. Pick any other company and any other product and it is the same - just because you purchase a product does not mean you have ANY say in management decisions, marketing, right to protest on their property against them, or whatever.
Yes it gives you a lot to say. The consumers - especially in the EU - have a very strong govern in terms of purchasing a product. Per example, the company is responsible for the form and function of the product, and it's also responsible for the product in a period after the purchase. Per example, here in Norway, if you purchase a dishwasher, then you can expect that it will last at least 2 years. That means that any malfunction to that dishwasher within those 2 years, can potentially be the responsibility of the sales place. If the product is faulty from the manufacturer, you get a new one.
The same goes for this game, the company is responsible to deliver as promise in the description when you purchase the game. If per example the servers are abnormally long off line, you have the right for compensation. So purchasing a product gives you a heap of things to say.Freedom of speech is a right, but so is refusal of service Frankly if someone comes to my place of business IRL and starts loudly complaining I show them the door. If they have legitimate concerns and bring them up in a mature way, I deal with them. But if they start getting an attitude or think I owe them anything they can bring their unprofitable problems to my competitors and good riddance. You are customers, not members of a cooperative.
It's a long procedure to deny someone access to your business. Only if they're aggressive or showing a threat to others can you deny them access to your business. I've had to deal with my share of drunk people, yet event those I've been responsible for (I've worked at a hotel). It's also bad for business just showing someone away from your store just because you don't like them.Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
I'm sorry but this statement is wrong. Old costumers that stay with the product for an extended period of time, does mean profit. Costumer loyalty is the best form of currency there is, and not only do they buy from you, they also advertise for you. I had a couple of business men travelling the Norwegian coast line for their company, and their company was very strict on where they should stay the night, and how much cost they should have on it. But since they were quite satisfied with the care in the hotel I worked in, they decided to give a dam about what their company said, and staid at hotels of the same chain I worked in. Good costumer relation pays of, and that's how I made most of my sales working at the hotel. I had so many in my portfolio, that I didn't have time to go looking for new costumers. I just called my long time relations, asked if they had any business for me, and they knew they could call me to get things done if they needed hotel services.
In both B2B and B2P sales, old costumer pays. So you're very wrong in this statement.
Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
OtarTheMad wrote: »Old customers are not more profitable than new customersWith ESO I would say the opposite is true. They have already made a product they can sell to new customers, but for older customers they have to incur new costs. The least profitable customers are those that play the most, and the most profitable are the casual players. In addition to using CPU processing time and bandwidth, high usage players demand more new content sooner, post uninformed BS rant videos to youtube and forums, and often ruin the experience for new customers. Personally if it were my business I'd try to get rid of you at all costs. Again - bring your unprofitable problems to the competition and good riddance.
I disagree with this. I think that in order to keep your business afloat you must cater to both crowds and a business MUST show loyalty to those who have been there from the start. If you do not do that then eventually it will catch up with any business because of word of mouth. People will start saying "They aren't loyal to you after a few months and treat you badly." You can watch the birds scatter after that gets out, then new players won't even bother.
While it is good to cater a product to new customers, like ESO has, you must also show some sort of loyalty with those of us who have been here a long time. Doing this enables you to have a solid business foundation while you work on growing your product. Maybe that's just me but alienating yourself from half of your target audience just because they are players who have played your game longer does not sound like a good move going forward.
scorpiodog wrote: »The customer is always right Hahahahahahaha - HA! If you actually believe companies when they tell you this, well ... let's just say I never want to eat in a restaurant with you. You probably don't realize the crimes against humanity that are being inflicted upon your seven-course meal when you send your soup back for being too hot.