PTS Patch Notes v2.3.2

Korax · February 2016

I would love it if you would actually move the loot history showing what you've just picked up to not render BEHIND the chat window!

Its impossible to see what you've just picked up when the chat window is active when using the controller UI. It would make real good sense showing that maybe above the chat window and not behind it.

All you can really discern is the quality/rarity of the things you've picked up.

Enodoc · February 2016

Korax wrote: »

I would love it if you would actually move the loot history showing what you've just picked up to not render BEHIND the chat window!

Its impossible to see what you've just picked up when the chat window is active when using the controller UI. It would make real good sense showing that maybe above the chat window and not behind it.

Does anyone know why Loot History is on the left at all for the console UI? It's on the right for the PC UI, and I don't see any reason that they would move it.

Jowrik · February 2016

kkravaritieb17_ESO wrote: »

Well we got a week to test and we re forced to do it with no cps whereas while the NA chars were copied for 2+ weeks they didnt think to try it then. You can see our frustration.

themdogesbite wrote: »

Jowrik wrote: »

I can't believe most of you are actually crying about the EU PTS characters not being able to test a CP-campaign.

It's PTS for crying out loud, it's meant to TEST, not to play the game with every item available.

If you're not gonna play the Non-CP campaign because "you can't test the CP system with your character", you're pretty damn selfish and i'd rather you not play PTS at all then.

themdogesbite wrote: »

This is dissapointing beyond belief. Now there's no reason for the entire EU PvP community to even bother going on PTS, not really the best way to get any feedback / reports about things not working as they are supposed to.

No reason? How about you just try it out instead of throwing in the towel early. If you wanna test the CP system in Cyrodiil, create a template and run it from there when they open up the other campaign again. You don't need your own character to do that.

"not really the best way to get any feedback / reports about things not working as they are supposed to", what things? You're just talking about CP then? Because you can test the *** out of everything else.

themdogesbite wrote: »

Cause so far in all of the guilds i reside within on EU there is not a single positive comment or remark on testing the non CP campaign, and the PvPers from EU have been waiting on getting our char copies to try things out. Instead now we are stuck wiht this absolute useless scenario where noone of us will play / we cant test out new builds in a actual enviorment.

We had plans to fight other guilds on PTS, thats not going to happen now since its not gonna be in a enviorment that slightly resembles how it will be on live. So why would be bother waisting our time wiht something we will never play within.

Besides, it's not like they even consider our feedback anyways, every previous PTS patch ever proves that.

This is really the worst lol. You can perfectly play and test the non-CP campaigns with other guilds and, who knows they may open up the other campaigns for EU at a later point.

Seriously, just logging in the PTS to min/max+test your build for live is just pathetic. It means you just wanna be as ready as you can when the patch hits, so you have the edge on people that can't play PTS. Test the game instead, and report malfunctions. If people like you (and I mean people heavily invested into PVP and builds) are giving up on that, even when a major PVP aspect changes (aka NON-CP campaigns) you're just selfish

Also, for a dueling guild like ARENA you're probably better off on a non-CP campaign anyway. It makes it a fair fight regardless who duels who in terms of CP.

By the way, i'm an EU PTS player.

ok so lets put it like this;

There are new SETS introduced into the game, sets that people want to try out. The medium that we usualy get to try theese out are via dueling. Noobody will use the new sets and have any success with them cause our stats are skeewed thanks to no CP, thus there won't be any feedback on them.

Is it strange that i want to find a setup for my characters whilst its free to test them? It's not like getting full v16 legendary gear is cheap theese days, i also cant test to play certain classes that i do not yet have on live with weapons i do not own on live to see how they would fare. So i know if its going to be worth it to grind out vMSA for 100 runs in order to get the drop i need.

We already canceled our GvG plans on PTS cause its not worth the hassle, everyone would have to recraft their gear and make completely new setups, for testing in a enviorment we wont actually play in live. So we can't get a accurate idea how the new changed skills with certain sets would perform within a certain scenario, thus we cant provide accurate feedback.

You see the problem im hinting at? Broken things gets found by playing, if noobody plays with it there wont be any feedback to give.

It's not strange you want to find a setup, but you're perfectly able to do that without the CP system in PVP, though your general stats will be slightly lower. I'm sure you can theorycraft from there on out if you really want to.
Honestly I'm having a hard time following you there. You can easily make a template character on the PTS (even with EU chars transferred) and have all the new sets/vMSA weapons there at your disposal (hell, you can even bank 'em and transfer them to your own character). If you don't have a character slot free for that I'm sure you can delete one that you don't play that often.

Why would you need any different gear or setup without CP's? Your stats will be lowered, that's about it. Stamina regen etc might be harder on you but atleast you can try it out for the most part with lowered stats right? You won't be able to bring feedback to the CP system no, but you'll still be able to test the tweaked skills, forward camps etc..

I don't really see the problem here..You're just slightly gimped compared to you saying it's just pointless even trying

themdogesbite · February 2016

Jowrik wrote: »

kkravaritieb17_ESO wrote: »

Well we got a week to test and we re forced to do it with no cps whereas while the NA chars were copied for 2+ weeks they didnt think to try it then. You can see our frustration.

themdogesbite wrote: »

Jowrik wrote: »

I can't believe most of you are actually crying about the EU PTS characters not being able to test a CP-campaign.

It's PTS for crying out loud, it's meant to TEST, not to play the game with every item available.

If you're not gonna play the Non-CP campaign because "you can't test the CP system with your character", you're pretty damn selfish and i'd rather you not play PTS at all then.

themdogesbite wrote: »

This is dissapointing beyond belief. Now there's no reason for the entire EU PvP community to even bother going on PTS, not really the best way to get any feedback / reports about things not working as they are supposed to.

No reason? How about you just try it out instead of throwing in the towel early. If you wanna test the CP system in Cyrodiil, create a template and run it from there when they open up the other campaign again. You don't need your own character to do that.

"not really the best way to get any feedback / reports about things not working as they are supposed to", what things? You're just talking about CP then? Because you can test the *** out of everything else.

themdogesbite wrote: »

Cause so far in all of the guilds i reside within on EU there is not a single positive comment or remark on testing the non CP campaign, and the PvPers from EU have been waiting on getting our char copies to try things out. Instead now we are stuck wiht this absolute useless scenario where noone of us will play / we cant test out new builds in a actual enviorment.

We had plans to fight other guilds on PTS, thats not going to happen now since its not gonna be in a enviorment that slightly resembles how it will be on live. So why would be bother waisting our time wiht something we will never play within.

Besides, it's not like they even consider our feedback anyways, every previous PTS patch ever proves that.

This is really the worst lol. You can perfectly play and test the non-CP campaigns with other guilds and, who knows they may open up the other campaigns for EU at a later point.

Seriously, just logging in the PTS to min/max+test your build for live is just pathetic. It means you just wanna be as ready as you can when the patch hits, so you have the edge on people that can't play PTS. Test the game instead, and report malfunctions. If people like you (and I mean people heavily invested into PVP and builds) are giving up on that, even when a major PVP aspect changes (aka NON-CP campaigns) you're just selfish

Also, for a dueling guild like ARENA you're probably better off on a non-CP campaign anyway. It makes it a fair fight regardless who duels who in terms of CP.

By the way, i'm an EU PTS player.

ok so lets put it like this;

There are new SETS introduced into the game, sets that people want to try out. The medium that we usualy get to try theese out are via dueling. Noobody will use the new sets and have any success with them cause our stats are skeewed thanks to no CP, thus there won't be any feedback on them.

Is it strange that i want to find a setup for my characters whilst its free to test them? It's not like getting full v16 legendary gear is cheap theese days, i also cant test to play certain classes that i do not yet have on live with weapons i do not own on live to see how they would fare. So i know if its going to be worth it to grind out vMSA for 100 runs in order to get the drop i need.

We already canceled our GvG plans on PTS cause its not worth the hassle, everyone would have to recraft their gear and make completely new setups, for testing in a enviorment we wont actually play in live. So we can't get a accurate idea how the new changed skills with certain sets would perform within a certain scenario, thus we cant provide accurate feedback.

You see the problem im hinting at? Broken things gets found by playing, if noobody plays with it there wont be any feedback to give.

It's not strange you want to find a setup, but you're perfectly able to do that without the CP system in PVP, though your general stats will be slightly lower. I'm sure you can theorycraft from there on out if you really want to.
Honestly I'm having a hard time following you there. You can easily make a template character on the PTS (even with EU chars transferred) and have all the new sets/vMSA weapons there at your disposal (hell, you can even bank 'em and transfer them to your own character). If you don't have a character slot free for that I'm sure you can delete one that you don't play that often.

Why would you need any different gear or setup without CP's? Your stats will be lowered, that's about it. Stamina regen etc might be harder on you but atleast you can try it out for the most part with lowered stats right? You won't be able to bring feedback to the CP system no, but you'll still be able to test the tweaked skills, forward camps etc..

I don't really see the problem here..You're just slightly gimped compared to you saying it's just pointless even trying

Obviously im aware of that i can bank items from the templates, it's not my frist ride on the PTS. However, calling it slightly gimped is a understatement, in 5 light seducer with 3x cost reduct enchants there is still arround a 350 cost diffrence and about the same regen missing from the loss of cp, and lets not even get into the raw stats lost from it. It is not a desireble testing enviorment.

Too clarify for you again, people can't try new sets cause their regens and costs are to diffrent from live, unless they want to do nothing else then resto heavy attacks. This is why people are forced into diffrent setups that are more regen based! (In a dueling scenario, which is what PTS consists off.)

Moveing on to the new things such as camps and tweaked skills. This is things that gets noticable as you play, which i mentioned in my previous post. By playing you notice if things are broken or working in a way thats undesirable, if people dont want to play on the test server there will be less feedback!

We also cannot test how CPs affect the tweaked skills inside Cyro, for example; How will burning embers heal work with 100 cp into quick recovery, will this break the skill makeing it incredibly unbalanced or not? Will proxy det damage scale of DoT damage increase, if so how much on players based of targets hit inside cyro, etc. Stuff like this that could be gamebreaking are now outside of our reach to properly test, and the only way to do it is to go on NPC in PvE which will provide inaccurate results.

So no, we can't test anything in this enviorment that holds any value for when the patch goes live. The only reason i can see that the non CP camp is there for is for ZOS themselfs to test if they can manage to implement it correctly, which evidently they have. So how about they give EU a camp with cp in a small incremental PTS patch so that we can actually do something usefull..

Ffolks · February 2016

Nightblade's Surprise Attack is still missing it's sound effect.

Fasold666 · February 2016

Seriously? I don't even...

http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/221681/zos-ignoring-game-breaking-bug-no-progress-in-fighters-mages-guild-skill-line/p1
Still no response on this.

ANY response please?
@ZOS_GinaBruno
@ZOS_RichLambert
@ZOS_KaiSchober
@ZOS_BrianWheeler
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom
@ZOS_GaryA
@ZOS_TristanK

whooligans · February 2016

Fasold666 wrote: »

Seriously? I don't even...

http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/221681/zos-ignoring-game-breaking-bug-no-progress-in-fighters-mages-guild-skill-line/p1
Still no response on this.

ANY response please?
@ZOS_GinaBruno
@ZOS_RichLambert
@ZOS_KaiSchober
@ZOS_BrianWheeler
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom
@ZOS_GaryA
@ZOS_TristanK

This should have been hotfixed already. I have no words for how they seem to treat the game. Just came back to the game and the mounting up camera bug is still in the game sinch launch. What a joke.

Daedgaming · February 2016

please fix willows path, please look into making it so you can split stacks of items while depositing or withdrawing from the guild bank, also make it so you can stack items in the guild bank. Do the same thing for the player bank.

Capsaica · February 2016

Having Shadow Cloak LOCKED OUT by another ability, whether that be magelight, piercing mark, flare, potions, or anything like that, is just wrong and very unbalanced. I am OK with not being able to return to stealth, or invisibility. That mechanic will actually be interesting to learn to play around. But to prevent a nightblade from being able to gain any of the passive benefits from using the skill is just rendering that skill absolutely useless. Not only that, you are locking out 20% of a skill bar. Let the nightblades pop our cloaks in a panicked frenzy and waste our magicka trying to return to stealth if we want to. Other players will take great pleasure in killing us, and we will either learn to play with it or become tasty AP morsels for everyone else. But intentionally locking the skill is just crippling and breaks the entire idea of a stealthy character class.

Will this break invisi-bats too?

I might as well play my templar and use focused charge. At least that is a bug and not an intended mechanism. And if you're going to lock out a skill, you might as well go whole-hog and lock out everything...

joleda4ub17_ESO · February 2016

ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »

Racial
Argonian
Amphibious: Increased the amount of Health, Magicka, and Stamina restored from this passive to 4/8/12% at Ranks I/II/III from 2/5/8%.

I'm a diehard Argonian player and welcome any buff, but I have two questions.

When compared to an Argonian, how much more Magicka can an Altmer regain in 45 seconds?
When compared to an Argonian, how much more Stamina can a Redgaurd regain in 45 seconds?

I honestly would like to know the numbers. Anyone have any idea what the values would be at 25, 50 or VR16?

RoyJade · February 2016

Based on a character with 40k main resource and 1k regen (more or less a classic pve setup), altmer will regen 2250 more magicka in 45 second, redguard will regen 2250 more stamina in 45 second (and bosmer 4725) and argonian will regain 4800 main resource with a potion.
With a pvp-based build (let's say 35k main resource and 2k regen), altmer/redguard will regen 4500 resource, argonian will regen 4200.

Conclusion : argonian passive can be better, but ask for a resource-stacking even more than magsorc, and it cost more. It's really a specialized race now, but not a bad one…if you can afford the price.

DHale · February 2016

Please wait until live to do your rage threats and quits they have a chance to fix stuff. Reading patch notes are not reasons to rage or quit. Play on the pts and play when it's live give it a week or two then decide. I play a Templar, sorc, and nightblade. I am invested in all at this point I feel all three have taken a hit. That may be good or bad I am not sure yet. What I do know is even with all the frustration I won't make any decisions until live. I can tell you based on pts I will likely no longer play my magic Templar yes I believe the damage output will be better but my survivability will be less so it's useless. I never depended on cloak so will play my nb and the shield nerf may require some adjustments. Maybe we will have a cyrodil full of DK's. Don't compare yourself to streamers or elite players or even friends... test it your self.

joleda4ub17_ESO · February 2016

RoyJade wrote: »

Based on a character with 40k main resource and 1k regen (more or less a classic pve setup), altmer will regen 2250 more magicka in 45 second, redguard will regen 2250 more stamina in 45 second (and bosmer 4725) and argonian will regain 4800 main resource with a potion.
With a pvp-based build (let's say 35k main resource and 2k regen), altmer/redguard will regen 4500 resource, argonian will regen 4200.

Conclusion : argonian passive can be better, but ask for a resource-stacking even more than magsorc, and it cost more. It's really a specialized race now, but not a bad one…if you can afford the price.

Thanks for that!!

RoyJade · February 2016

You're welcome

We can do a better analyze based on top-stuff and needs (for example a pve player don't need regen, so the extra regen of argonian aren't very good, but on the other hand top player's potion build can spam even more with an argonian), and more of that we need to test in real situation, it's just a theory actually ^^

Pirhana7_ESO · February 2016

What is the point of having a no CP campaign? CPs have been capped at 501 and it is very easy to catch on CPs now. It does not take long to get a few hundred CPs and the difference between 200 and 500 is very minimal since the first few hundred CPs are worth the most.
You need some kind of PVP progression to give you something to push for so your character can always get better. No one wants to hit that "I'm finished wall" CPs are perfect for that longterm minimal progression

A No CP campaign... why not have a no levels campaign, a no gear campaign, basically everyone is exactly equal and the same, no building a character even needed....

RoyJade · February 2016

A lot of player don't want to grind 300 cp to be competitive in pvp, this no-cp campaign is builded for them. Moreover, CP can give a lot of build possibility, but also negate the need of resource management for a lot of players. This campaign bring back these needs for those who want more difficult or less burst-style fight.

In my opinion, a non-cp campaign is a very good idea, but should not be the only campaign. We need some cp-enabled campaign. But here, we are on the PTS, we are here to test, and we can only have one campaign, so having only the non-cp campaign is a good idea.

Oh, and we have a non-vet campaign and that's one of the best campaign in the entire game because a lot of thing, especially the insane burst build limitation and the lack of deto/meteor/AP farming guild (they are some, but less than in vet campaign).

themdogesbite · February 2016

RoyJade wrote: »

A lot of player don't want to grind 300 cp to be competitive in pvp, this no-cp campaign is builded for them. Moreover, CP can give a lot of build possibility, but also negate the need of resource management for a lot of players. This campaign bring back these needs for those who want more difficult or less burst-style fight.

In my opinion, a non-cp campaign is a very good idea, but should not be the only campaign. We need some cp-enabled campaign. But here, we are on the PTS, we are here to test, and we can only have one campaign, so having only the non-cp campaign is a good idea.

Oh, and we have a non-vet campaign and that's one of the best campaign in the entire game because a lot of thing, especially the insane burst build limitation and the lack of deto/meteor/AP farming guild (they are some, but less than in vet campaign).

The impletation of a non CP campaign on live is great, haveing it currently on PTS however is not as great as EU players can't provide any meaningfull feedback.

TX12001rwb17_ESO · February 2016

Can we get it so we have our vampire and werewolf skills maxed out on the templates as well if we decide to use the bite thing and become them?

RoyJade · February 2016

I know, I'm a EU player. But this test is necessary, someone have to do it. If the non-cp campaign have bugs, it's our "work" to test it and to report them and that is a meaningful feedback (not about cp and maxed build, but about this new feature and a non-cp build). US players have more comfort, but we aren't here for comfort.
Perhaps ZOS would give us a cp-active campaign during our character copy time, but I mostly have seen player who just complains because they aren't threaded like US player (I can understand, but most of these complain are just selfish). I haven't seen many EU player who just ask ZOS to give us a cp-enabled player.

ToRelax · February 2016

RoyJade wrote: »

I know, I'm a EU player. But this test is necessary, someone have to do it. If the non-cp campaign have bugs, it's our "work" to test it and to report them and that is a meaningful feedback (not about cp and maxed build, but about this new feature and a non-cp build). US players have more comfort, but we aren't here for comfort.
Perhaps ZOS would give us a cp-active campaign during our character copy time, but I mostly have seen player who just complains because they aren't threaded like US player (I can understand, but most of these complain are just selfish). I haven't seen many EU player who just ask ZOS to give us a cp-enabled player.

You talk as though we had any duty to attend the PTS. It's an offer that usually benefits both sides, the players can test out the new update and ZOS gets feedback and bug reports on it. That doesn't work if there is no incentive for the players to test out anything on PTS.

WolfWarrior84 · February 2016

r.jan_emailb16_ESO wrote: »

WolfWarrior84 wrote: »

Alliance War
Assault
Increased the amount of AP required to rank up this skill line by approximately 80% compared to current PTS values.
Support
Increased the amount of AP required to rank up this skill line by approximately 80% compared to current PTS values.

Why increase this at all it was way to hard to level to begin with. i understand it is an increase from the lower numbers on PTS but were they that low they needed an increase applied?

Yes. It's now not even 20% of what you need on live right now.

thanks

Sureshawt · February 2016

harrlockk616 wrote: »

[quote="gen_reynard2050;

@ZOS_GinaBruno isn't tis very anti/racist on NB... the only NB escape or defend class ability... Do you ZOS really so HATE NB?

Welcome to the club . they also hate Templar

Yea ...If you want to join the love club then you gotta roll Sorc. The faceroll keyboard and win class since the game released and remains so.

Most devs are Harry Potter and Gandalf wannabe types and thus this class will always be favored.

hrothbern · February 2016

Sureshawt wrote: »

harrlockk616 wrote: »

[quote="gen_reynard2050;

@ZOS_GinaBruno isn't tis very anti/racist on NB... the only NB escape or defend class ability... Do you ZOS really so HATE NB?

Welcome to the club . they also hate Templar

Yea ...If you want to join the love club then you gotta roll Sorc. The faceroll keyboard and win class since the game released and remains so.

Most devs are Harry Potter and Gandalf wannabe types and thus this class will always be favored.

With 1.5 second casting time on the Sorc Shields, interruptable, the love club will poor many tears

Sureshawt · February 2016

hrothbern wrote: »

Sureshawt wrote: »

harrlockk616 wrote: »

[quote="gen_reynard2050;

@ZOS_GinaBruno isn't tis very anti/racist on NB... the only NB escape or defend class ability... Do you ZOS really so HATE NB?

Welcome to the club . they also hate Templar

Yea ...If you want to join the love club then you gotta roll Sorc. The faceroll keyboard and win class since the game released and remains so.

Most devs are Harry Potter and Gandalf wannabe types and thus this class will always be favored.

With 1.5 second casting time on the Sorc Shields, interruptable, the love club will poor many tears

Are trolling me or is that actually planned? I've heard a lot suggestions for shield stacking but not this and it actually sounds pretty reasonable. Far more so then say a counter skill that causes a 5 second lockout from using shield skills.

hrothbern · February 2016

Sureshawt wrote: »

hrothbern wrote: »

Sureshawt wrote: »

harrlockk616 wrote: »

[quote="gen_reynard2050;

@ZOS_GinaBruno isn't tis very anti/racist on NB... the only NB escape or defend class ability... Do you ZOS really so HATE NB?

Welcome to the club . they also hate Templar

Yea ...If you want to join the love club then you gotta roll Sorc. The faceroll keyboard and win class since the game released and remains so.

Most devs are Harry Potter and Gandalf wannabe types and thus this class will always be favored.

With 1.5 second casting time on the Sorc Shields, interruptable, the love club will poor many tears

Are trolling me or is that actually planned? I've heard a lot suggestions for shield stacking but not this and it actually sounds pretty reasonable. Far more so then say a counter skill that causes a 5 second lockout from using shield skills.

No, I am not trolling, I am more the dry humor type

I just boiled down some remarks made on ESO live of Feb 12 in one sentence.

But everybody can make up his own opinion what Eric Wrobel thoughts were on Damage Shields in so far mentioned by him at that ESO live.

Future Damage Shields starts at 47.00 minutes and ends at 51.00. At around 50.00 minutes he mentions a cast time of 1.5 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKu7GnANIO8

I think it could end up being devastating for Sorc pet builds (whatI care for)
and end up being a substantial nerf to the classic Sorc.

I made more remarks on this topic in thread below about pet Sorcs.

http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/2707156/#Comment_2707156

DHale · February 2016

The magic sorc class would never survive without shields it is entirely dependent on them. That said except for a small group of l2p players that need shield breaker and a bow to kill a sorc. On a nb or Stam dk crit Rush and 2 wb is all anyone needs.

dylanjaygrobbelaarb16_ESO · February 2016

Pirhana7_ESO wrote: »

What is the point of having a no CP campaign? CPs have been capped at 501 and it is very easy to catch on CPs now. It does not take long to get a few hundred CPs and the difference between 200 and 500 is very minimal since the first few hundred CPs are worth the most.
You need some kind of PVP progression to give you something to push for so your character can always get better. No one wants to hit that "I'm finished wall" CPs are perfect for that longterm minimal progression

A No CP campaign... why not have a no levels campaign, a no gear campaign, basically everyone is exactly equal and the same, no building a character even needed....

Go play the cp campaign. The diccerence between 200 and 500 is a lot. It iz not a short time to catch up for people who just want to play and are fed up with grinds. If your not playing a few hours a day and instead play a few hours a week, and want to play instead of grind, you will never catch up. I hope no cp is populated enough to play. Not everyone is too scared to face opponents on a more even paying field like you are. So just play cp campaign and dont worry about it. Also blackwater should have always been like this not people twinking all th3 new subs to death.

SneaK · February 2016

I'm on console, are you guys saying Toppling Charge is still broken on the PTS?

If so, what a **snipping** joke.

Sureshawt · February 2016

hrothbern wrote: »

Sureshawt wrote: »

hrothbern wrote: »

Sureshawt wrote: »

harrlockk616 wrote: »

[quote="gen_reynard2050;

@ZOS_GinaBruno isn't tis very anti/racist on NB... the only NB escape or defend class ability... Do you ZOS really so HATE NB?

Welcome to the club . they also hate Templar

Yea ...If you want to join the love club then you gotta roll Sorc. The faceroll keyboard and win class since the game released and remains so.

Most devs are Harry Potter and Gandalf wannabe types and thus this class will always be favored.

With 1.5 second casting time on the Sorc Shields, interruptable, the love club will poor many tears

Are trolling me or is that actually planned? I've heard a lot suggestions for shield stacking but not this and it actually sounds pretty reasonable. Far more so then say a counter skill that causes a 5 second lockout from using shield skills.

No, I am not trolling, I am more the dry humor type
I just boiled down some remarks made on ESO live of Feb 12 in one sentence.

But everybody can make up his own opinion what Eric Wrobel thoughts were on Damage Shields in so far mentioned by him at that ESO live.

Future Damage Shields starts at 47.00 minutes and ends at 51.00. At around 50.00 minutes he mentions a cast time of 1.5 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKu7GnANIO8

I think it could end up being devastating for Sorc pet builds (whatI care for)
and end up being a substantial nerf to the classic Sorc.

I made more remarks on this topic in thread below about pet Sorcs.

http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/2707156/#Comment_2707156

Well I'm glad to hear they are at least considering about such a change to the crazy shield stacking mechanic. Thanks for sharing this video man!

SlayerSyrena · February 2016

Any fix on the Crown Store Zombie Horse Mount? Mine is still missing sound effects when it rears.