"We continue to work on the console versions of ESO, and game development has been progressing steadily, but we are still working to solve a series of unique problems specific to those platforms. Integrating our systems with each console manufacturer’s networks—which are both different from the PC/Mac system as well as different from each other—has been a challenging process."
I wonder if that's truely the case, or are they stalling for time to polish the game before they launch on console?
"We continue to work on the console versions of ESO, and game development has been progressing steadily, but we are still working to solve a series of unique problems specific to those platforms. Integrating our systems with each console manufacturer’s networks—which are both different from the PC/Mac system as well as different from each other—has been a challenging process."
I wonder if that's truely the case, or are they stalling for time to polish the game before they launch on console?
From what I remember of CCP when they released Dust 514 (if you are unaware of these, CCP run eve and dust 514 is their console version of a game which runs in the eve universe.) They never released dust 514 on the Xbox because it has a closed network, the idea being its harder for people to hack accounts and games. However PS allowed for cross network access (which might explain why PS accounts used to get hacked a lot at first).
I should imagine if they wish to release the console version across all platforms at the same time then they need to get each platform working and available before they release any of them, or if they was to go as CCP did they would only release on the one available platform (in CCP with Dust 514 it was the PS they released on) which means anyone who owned an Xbox and wanted to play dust had to buy a PS.
I can absolutely believe that this would cause trouble if they wanted to have these games all integrated into one working system.
GossiTheDog wrote: »
If you read the link, you can pay another $20 to transfer your character to console.
Another leaked rumor that turned out to be true I guess. I still think they might be holding off until they get the cash shop ready and go free to play.
GossiTheDog wrote: »
If you read the link, you can pay another $20 to transfer your character to console.
That's pretty cool. Still sucks you have to buy another copy of the game. I also wish they'd allow you to link the console copy to your pc subscription. Just make it so you can only be logged in from a single location at a time. Seems reasonable to me?
deathly809_ESO wrote: »Another leaked rumor that turned out to be true I guess. I still think they might be holding off until they get the cash shop ready and go free to play.
If this game goes free to play then I am out. Free to play either nickel and dimes you to make forward progress, or you end up with two tiers of players, the best who are paying, or the people who struggle and never get the good gear who don't pay.
deathly809_ESO wrote: »GossiTheDog wrote: »
If you read the link, you can pay another $20 to transfer your character to console.
That's pretty cool. Still sucks you have to buy another copy of the game. I also wish they'd allow you to link the console copy to your pc subscription. Just make it so you can only be logged in from a single location at a time. Seems reasonable to me?
It is $20 to transfer AND another free month to play. So really only $5.
deathly809_ESO wrote: »
That's pretty cool. Still sucks you have to buy another copy of the game. I also wish they'd allow you to link the console copy to your pc subscription. Just make it so you can only be logged in from a single location at a time. Seems reasonable to me?
It is $20 to transfer AND another free month to play. So really only $5.
deathly809_ESO wrote: »deathly809_ESO wrote: »deathly809_ESO wrote: »
That's pretty cool. Still sucks you have to buy another copy of the game. I also wish they'd allow you to link the console copy to your pc subscription. Just make it so you can only be logged in from a single location at a time. Seems reasonable to me?
It is $20 to transfer AND another free month to play. So really only $5.
I just wish you could go back and forth. Like, maybe one day I want to play on the PC, and the next I want to play on the Xbox. Or maybe I'm away from home, and I have a PC available to play on. Maybe I'm at my brothers house, and he has the console version of the game, and I want to play on it while he's doing homework or something.
I understand having to buy the box copy, but having to acquire a new subscription and pay to move your character to it seems unnecessary to me.
Yeah, of course you might never get any clarification on if you can until too late. Of course I think accounts are through three different account systems: Xbox live, Playstation Network, and whatever they call their PC account system.
Can't you play your Diablo3 account on console or PC? I haven't bought the console version of it, yet. Does anyone know if that's the case?
Playstation Network and Xbox Live are just Internet access layers. They shouldn't have anything to do with the subscription model in my opinion.
deathly809_ESO wrote: »Can't you play your Diablo3 account on console or PC? I haven't bought the console version of it, yet. Does anyone know if that's the case?
Playstation Network and Xbox Live are just Internet access layers. They shouldn't have anything to do with the subscription model in my opinion.
If you make a character on the PC you cannot play it on the console for Diablo III obviously and the reverse is true.
They are not just a proxy to the internet. There are stipulations on what you can and cannot use them for. Also you have to pay for the Xbox live service if you want to play multiplayer which is total BS.
clocksstoppe wrote: »"pay us more money"
seriously zeni?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »I called the delay weeks ago. Im also predicting it will be cancelled in the coming months.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »I called the delay weeks ago. Im also predicting it will be cancelled in the coming months.
The delay cancelled? Or the console versions themselves?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »I called the delay weeks ago. Im also predicting it will be cancelled in the coming months.
The delay cancelled? Or the console versions themselves?
The console version. Consoles have an abysmal track record for getting mmo ports.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »I called the delay weeks ago. Im also predicting it will be cancelled in the coming months.
The delay cancelled? Or the console versions themselves?
The console version. Consoles have an abysmal track record for getting mmo ports.
I was trying to think of another MMO console game, and couldn't think of any. I don't consider Diablo3 an MMO.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »I called the delay weeks ago. Im also predicting it will be cancelled in the coming months.
The delay cancelled? Or the console versions themselves?
The console version. Consoles have an abysmal track record for getting mmo ports.
I was trying to think of another MMO console game, and couldn't think of any. I don't consider Diablo3 an MMO.