Apparently you don't understand that a lot of people have chat disabled. I've been accused of botting multiple times and even had to speak to GMs about it. Reason why? They tried to talk to me in public chat, and I have that disabled.
You cannot prove, as a regular player, who is a bot and who isn't in all cases. If you think anything otherwise, you're not bright.
Hey, it's the bot apologist!
I'm totally against the idea in this particular thread, but why is it everywhere I go I see you defending the botpeople?
Don't answer, I don't really care why. Defending bots makes you a bot.
Apparently you don't understand that a lot of people have chat disabled. I've been accused of botting multiple times and even had to speak to GMs about it. Reason why? They tried to talk to me in public chat, and I have that disabled.
You cannot prove, as a regular player, who is a bot and who isn't in all cases. If you think anything otherwise, you're not bright.
Hey, it's the bot apologist!
I'm totally against the idea in this particular thread, but why is it everywhere I go I see you defending the botpeople?
Don't answer, I don't really care why. Defending bots makes you a bot.
This couldn't work for both legal and public relation reasons.
There's other concerns, as well. i.e. a house guest jumps on your computer while you're in the bathroom or your account becomes compromised.
This has been tried before, though. I, and thousands of others over the years, did serve as volunteer Customer Service during the EverQuest era. Eventually, you'll end up picking up one or two people who actually turn out to be malicious, and all manner of problems arise. A lot of our abilities/power had to be stripped after a while, because that's just what ends up happening.
Humans, who're not legally bound to contract with penalties (i.e. being fired), have a tendency to become power hungry.
Apparently you don't understand that a lot of people have chat disabled. I've been accused of botting multiple times and even had to speak to GMs about it. Reason why? They tried to talk to me in public chat, and I have that disabled.
You cannot prove, as a regular player, who is a bot and who isn't in all cases. If you think anything otherwise, you're not bright.
Hey, it's the bot apologist!
I'm totally against the idea in this particular thread, but why is it everywhere I go I see you defending the botpeople?
Don't answer, I don't really care why. Defending bots makes you a bot.
starkerealm wrote: »
I believe that was what you Earth beings call "sarcasm."
At least someone understands. +Awesome for you.
toddcanniffub17_ESO wrote: »Because I am a player that would use it to do good, not a troll who's going to ban someone because they asked where to buy a mount or where the bank is.
toddcanniffub17_ESO wrote: »toddcanniffub17_ESO wrote: »Because I am a player that would use it to do good, not a troll who's going to ban someone because they asked where to buy a mount or where the bank is.
How do you determine that people farming a boss in a (public?) dungeon should be banned? How do you determine which players are bots? Where do you draw the line about banning someone in chat?
If you can't distinguish botters from players you need to see your nearest eye specialist. GO OBAMACARE!!! <oozing with sarcasm>
Was that Fallen Earth?This is a bad idea. Especially when/if a player starts being stupid with the power to ban. The company will be liable for it, and at least with company employees they can sort of stand behind their decision. Only employees with signed contracts should have this ability.
I played another MMO once where they gave certain players "Sheriff" badges. They couldn't ban players or do anything by themselves, but two of them together could send a player into a jail cell for 1 hour. Supposedly it was only supposed to be done to trolls and the like, but it quickly became abused. Anyone that disagreed with them or called them out on things would end up in a jail cell for two hours. Sometimes they'd even wait for you to get out and send you back. This system lasted for a very short time.
I am all for empowering players to assist other players, but they should never be given disciplinary powers.
So, has anyone actually seen a GM in game? What about interacting with one in game that actually does something to fix your issue in game while you're on, like something you saw happen?
That alone could help with some of the issues we're having with bots and gold spammers. However, it doesn't seem ZOS actually has anyone in the game to see what's happening first hand. At least I haven't seen it so far... anyone else?
If ZOS can't even bother to put one of their own in the game to monitor things, why on earth would they give a player those abilities?
toddcanniffub17_ESO wrote: »I feel a good way to deal with bots would be to give select players that prove themselves power to ban. I personally have reported 200+ botters and gold spammers. There are trolls that should not be given this power but people like me that just want to make bots go away could save the GM's a lot of time and trouble. Every time I go dungeon diving I see five or more that I could take care of while I'm in there.
Just a thought, though it will never happen because of toxic players that would ban someone who took their kill or got to a node before them.
JessieColtub17_ESO wrote: »toddcanniffub17_ESO wrote: »Because I am a player that would use it to do good, not a troll who's going to ban someone because they asked where to buy a mount or where the bank is.
I do Customer Support for another game creator. And personally, the very LAST person I would ever believe or trust is the person who makes claims like you have.
We had one user who went around claiming they were one of the creators of the game and that if people did something in the game, they would be rewarded after xxx number of days.
That same user then sent in a support request claiming they bought something in the game but didn't get it, so could we please give them the stuff. We asked for proof.
The "proof" that the user provided? A reply that said "Can't you trust me, I am an honest person and would never try to cheat anyone".
yeah, right!!!!
No freaking way in hell should any user, ever, anywhere, ever be given administrative rights in a game.
You do NOT work for the game company. You do NOT have training in company policies regarding how to deal with these issues.
If you were given the power, the company would open themselves up to all kinds of legal issues with what you are requesting.
The first moronic user that managed to ban my account, or even kick me from the game, would result in the game company getting a lawsuit filed against them.
I paid for this game, I am playing this game within the ToS, and no peon user should ever be given the power to affect my gameplay in the manner you are asking for.
So no, you are absolutely wrong to ask for those powers. You will never, ever, be given those powers, and any company stupid enough to do so would find themselves out of business so fast that they would think an F5 tornado wrapped in a Cat 5 hurricane just hit their offices without warning.
ebuntsb14_ESO wrote: »
2. As mentioned, I may leave my computer for few min. to use the restroom, answer the door (maybe I ordered pizza) or any number of reasons why I'm not at the keyboard. Even GM's generally give you several min. to reply. And then they don't ban you right away but instead just kick you or suspend you while they investigate you.
Jim_McMasterub17_ESO wrote: »So, has anyone actually seen a GM in game? What about interacting with one in game that actually does something to fix your issue in game while you're on, like something you saw happen?
That alone could help with some of the issues we're having with bots and gold spammers. However, it doesn't seem ZOS actually has anyone in the game to see what's happening first hand. At least I haven't seen it so far... anyone else?
If ZOS can't even bother to put one of their own in the game to monitor things, why on earth would they give a player those abilities?
I would agree with this poster. Zenimax is not doing a very good job at policing their own game from within.
I also find it interesting the number of negative responses here.
..But then again I'm a firm believer that people breaking the rules; tend to keep tabs on the rule-makers in case they need to change their methods.
Jim_McMasterub17_ESO wrote: »Doowie ...Typical.
"Yeah you DO that...& I'll SUE your A** for wrongful prosecution.."
I suggest you re-read my post; I was agreeing with ZoS oversight. Not player; & was pointing out how many scammers keep tabs on the "law" so they can rout around it.
...& You're right, I've never worked in "an industry where you have to enforce rules, policies and procedures to keep a customer/civilian happy."
I was only a marine combat medic for 14 years, & now a paramedic & volunteer fireman.
DO continue to tell me how I have a poor perception of rules, wrongdoers, & or legal implications for action or non-action.
Jim_McMasterub17_ESO wrote: »"I was only a marine combat medic for 14 years, & now a paramedic & volunteer fireman."
Jim_McMasterub17_ESO wrote: »
I was only a marine combat medic for 14 years, & now a paramedic & volunteer fireman.